Skip to comments.
Is this really unexploded ordnance?
CNN.COM ^
| 10-15-01
| me
Posted on 10/15/2001 6:58:05 AM PDT by finnman69
Edited on 04/29/2004 1:59:17 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
I wonder if this is really unexploded ordnance or is this maybe a drop tank? Any experts care to weigh in? The scale of this picture is a little misleading with that figure in the background, but on news footage i saw this weekend this object appeared to be 8' to 10' long.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: Cliff Dweller
Might have been pickled if AAA opened up on them while they were rolling in on a target.
To: Dakmar
Dakmar is right.
22
posted on
10/15/2001 9:16:16 AM PDT
by
Lady Jag
To: finnman69
Drop tank. No fins.
To: finnman69
It's the dreaded CHEMTRAIL dispenser tank, obviously emptied out of its nefarious contents.
To: finnman69
My husband is retired USMC Aviation Ordnance and said it did not look like one of ours...
25
posted on
10/15/2001 9:26:36 AM PDT
by
tutstar
To: poindexter
Guys-- let's do some visual scaling. F-15/FA-18s are about 65 feet long, give or take an extremeity. Let's say the guy in the photo is 5.5 feet tall, and this thing is about 6 time his length. Or argue me down and say it's only 5 times his length. That would make this thing somewhere between 22 and 32 feet long. On a 65 foot aircraft?? Come on. Why would they need that large a fuel load anyway? Plus the 'rear' of this thing is 'squared'. Not at all good for airflow mgmt. Could this possibly be off of something really LARGE, like a BUFF, that needs to fly a long way, and perhaps this is only the front of it?
I am by no needs an expert, but we can all do a little more intensive photo interpretation before deciding this device is off a US fighter/attack aircraft.
This is my opinion, I welcome your flames ... 8-)
26
posted on
10/15/2001 9:30:45 AM PDT
by
Blueflag
To: Cliff Dweller
You drop the tanks when needed....before they were destroyed (and "every AA missile" can never be destroyed!) many AA rockets were fired at US planes.
To increase manuevering rates, increase up exit speeds when evading a missile, etc. the drop tanks are the first to go. Bombs too - sometimes. After all, you still have to deliver the weapons, and sometimes that means staying on the drop path while the rocket is inbound.
To: finnman69
I'm looking at the relative scale of that thing......it looks to be over 7-8 FEET in diameter, based on the apparent image of the man behind it.
Unless the camera was using a fisheye (distorting) lens, or was shot from high overhead looking down into a valley/ditch while the man was standing below, that things is over twenty feet long!
To: finnman69
To: michigander
Those appear to be ferry tanks on the F-16, three of them. Here's the same on an F-15
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/f-15-dvic227.jpg
Sorry, never have figured out the link to picture thing...
Either way, this device in the photo is bigger than either of the tanks on the 15/16.
Could be a really odd camera angle though.
30
posted on
10/15/2001 9:51:12 AM PDT
by
Blueflag
To: michigander
LOOKS LIKE A PRETTY GOOD MATCH TO ME. Even if you compare the scale of the pilot to the tank on the F-16, it seems similar in size AND has a squared end.
To: Blueflag
I think the object LOOKS bigger because the picture is taken from ABOVE the man nearby which foreshortens his appearance and makes the object look bigger.
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Thanks, your years of flying experience (in tactical jet aircraft) is quite evident. Check six.
To: finnman69
ABOVE the man nearby which foreshortens his appearance
Yea, I think you are right. If you look at where his hands are in relation ot his legs, his legs look like they're about a foot long. Must've been using a wide angle lens with a short aperture (I could have that backwards). When I took my amateure photog class we had to take a picture which showed how you can make objects in the background shrink or grow in relation to the foreground. I think aperture was the setting. (yes, I'm still an ameteur! :o)
34
posted on
10/15/2001 10:05:29 AM PDT
by
RedWing9
To: Cliff Dweller
Nah, he's probably just a Falcon desk jockey! LOL
35
posted on
10/15/2001 10:06:30 AM PDT
by
RedWing9
To: Dakmar
I think it's Bin Laden Hitlary's "Personal Pleasure Device".
36
posted on
10/15/2001 10:13:18 AM PDT
by
McGruff
Comment #37 Removed by Moderator
Comment #38 Removed by Moderator
To: semper_libertas
Maybe an old Russkie tank. I remember reading long ago that many of their aircraft weapons hardpoints were designed to accept NATO munitions. So their tanks might look like ours also. Which brings me back to another thought. Was this tank paced here by the Taliban for a photo op?
To: finnman69
Here's a better perspective of the size of the talk:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson