Skip to comments.
Networks Kill Bin Laden Videos
FoxNews.com ^
| October 10, 2001
| FoxNews, The Associated Press
Posted on 10/10/2001 11:29:41 AM PDT by grimalkin
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:31:22 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
1
posted on
10/10/2001 11:29:41 AM PDT
by
grimalkin
To: grimalkin
This rather hilarious since they've already aired them for the last week. I welcome the idea that they won't in the future but question the reasoning behind playing them over and over for as long as they did.
To: grimalkin
As I recall several people here on FR mentioned this possibility about 4 seconds after the tape aired. Good to know the Cabinet members are lurking. It just takes them a while to catch on, I guess.
3
posted on
10/10/2001 11:37:03 AM PDT
by
the crow
To: grimalkin
Just a random question... why does it seem that only Fox (and the FBI) spells Osoma bin Laden with a "U"?
4
posted on
10/10/2001 11:37:30 AM PDT
by
Nouge
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: grimalkin
6
posted on
10/10/2001 11:38:54 AM PDT
by
SAMWolf
To: grimalkin
What about PMS-NBC? Anyway it looks like maybe the government is listening to Michael Savage because he called for this yesterday... Wow!
7
posted on
10/10/2001 11:39:50 AM PDT
by
Dengar01
To: mercy
Yup. Better deport all the fat ladies too.
8
posted on
10/10/2001 11:41:40 AM PDT
by
drjimmy
To: grimalkin
Wonder if he planned on biting his lip, or wearing a tie?
To: SAMWolf
heh, funny!
That one's going in my deployed husband's email...I'm sure he'll enjoy it.
Regarding the videos -- whether they contain codes or not, it's idiotic hateful propaganda. I am a former news director -- I would NEVER air tapes like this. It's better policy to show a short clip with no sound and paraphrase in a case like this. It would be hard to resist showing the bin Laden tape, but the terrorist network vids calling for a jihad? No.
Natural sound and the actual speaker are better generally, but don't win against national security concerns.
To: grimalkin
They need to be careful about even summarizing a video. Anything could be a pre-arranged signal: what he says, where he is, what he wears, who is standing next to him.
They should report that he released another video. End of report. It won't stop reporting from foreign news services (which can be heard on a shortwave radio), but it will put an end to this potential communication channel.
To: SAMWolf
terrific ! ROTFLMAO !
To: grimalkin
I for one am not interested in anything this these murdering B**tards have to say anyway..
To: grimalkin
At the Ari Fleischer press conference there were a few questions with a sort of hurt, "but that's not fair" tone to them coming from the reporters. You can bet that for some (if not most) of these people, the "right to know" ought to supercede national security every day of the week. Reminds me of the Peter Jennings et al round table in which they declared that they were journalists first and Americans second (in response to the hypothetical scenario that if they were covering a war and saw that a group of American soldiers heading into an enemy ambush, would they warn the soldiers or film the ambush).
(One of my prized possessions is a letter from Ronald Reagan re: his ban on reporters during the Grenada invasion...as a reporter myself, I sent him a letter telling him I supported his decision entirely, that national security was far more important that some journalist winning an award for on-the-spot coverage. He wrote back to thank me and wished that I was in the Washington press corp. I love that guy.)
14
posted on
10/10/2001 11:48:43 AM PDT
by
shezza
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: DoughtyOne
I welcome the idea that they won't in the future but question the reasoning behind playing them over and over for as long as they did. Quite rightly. I would hazard a guess that it's because they are so used to taking handouts from unsavory sources and sticking them right on the air as news. They've pretty well gotten out of the habit of collecting and impartially analyzing news on their own initiative. Since they are no longer getting feeds from clinton's White House basement, they are delighted to take similar pieces of spin and propaganda from folks like Bin Laden and an assortment of Middle-Eastern terrorists and fanatical Imams.
16
posted on
10/10/2001 12:13:06 PM PDT
by
Cicero
To: JA
Well, my great greats migrated from New England in the early nineteenth century, but being just poor clod busters the records are not well kept.
You can abuse me all you want but your ideas about immigration are out dated and out moded. I'm not going after all foreigners, just terrs and terr sympths. Sorry if a lot of background folks get booted but perhaps they can save themselves by PROVING THEIR LOYALTIES.
17
posted on
10/10/2001 12:15:15 PM PDT
by
mercy
To: JA
Our diversity and tolerance is what made this country great. This is FreeRepublic pal...not NPR....
I have no tolerance for terrorists nor do I give a damn about diversity.........
We Americans are more similar than dissimilar.... AMERICANS!!!!
18
posted on
10/10/2001 12:26:05 PM PDT
by
cbkaty
To: Cicero
Sounds about right.
To: grimalkin
Well, it's ABOUT TIME someone used their brain on this!
20
posted on
10/10/2001 12:40:08 PM PDT
by
smiley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson