Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

60 Minutes: Iraq Has Smallpox
Newsmax ^ | 10/8/01

Posted on 10/08/2001 6:56:39 AM PDT by truthandlife

60 Minutes reported Sunday night that Iraq has a strain of smallpox.

Smallpox is a deadly and highly contagious virus.

Only two countries were believed to have strains of the virus, the U.S. and Russia.

60 Minutes' Mike Wallace reported this evening that Saddam Hussein acquired some of the smallpox virus from a laboratory in Russia.

Russian scientists have also been helping countries like Iraq and Iran developed biological weapons.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last
To: OWK
Sorry. I thought you were one of the big "battlers" for the right of drunks to own the road. I apologize.

But see the post from Physicist, above.

81 posted on 10/08/2001 9:19:47 AM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: MadameAxe
But the drunk (who ALWAYS thinks he can hold his liquor, and is NEVER "impaired" unless you actually test him) protests his innocence to all who'll listen.

Ask Saddam. He'll tell you he's innocent, too.

82 posted on 10/08/2001 9:21:26 AM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
I'm not a battler for "drunks to own the roads". Although I do think the ever shrinking limits are ridiculous and ineffective to their stated purpose, it's off topic for this thread.

I merely pointed out to you the difference in intent between the drunk and the evil dictator.

83 posted on 10/08/2001 9:28:18 AM PDT by MadameAxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Just one more reason to blow away madman Saddam and thumb our noses at the Wahhadist oil Sheiks.

If the west won't buy their oil, who will??

84 posted on 10/08/2001 9:37:06 AM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Illbay, OWK
you can't move against someone BEFORE he does something to harm you."

When someone has a gun pointed at you do you wait for him to kill you before you fire back or do you kill first in self defense?

85 posted on 10/08/2001 9:38:00 AM PDT by Gracey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill; willyone; Martin Tell; alethia
Thanks for all the info guys.

I figured it was something like this. I'd like to say it makes me feel better but...

alethia - I'm pretty sure my mom told me they had discontinued the vaccine by the time I was born, that was in 1961. I could be mistaken, this was in MI.

MKM

86 posted on 10/08/2001 9:45:27 AM PDT by mykdsmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: OWK
I don't have a dog in this fight, but I seem to remember some threads on Libertarian philosophy several months ago that discussed pre-emptive force and whether it was justified. As I remember, there are differing views within Libertarianism. What is the mainstream, if there is such a thing, libertarian view on pre-emptive force?
87 posted on 10/08/2001 10:04:49 AM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: raygun
Me worry? No way, I was just pointing out the accuracy of prophecy. It is obvious that the conditions described are only able to happen in this day and age, given the weapons we have.
88 posted on 10/08/2001 10:09:36 AM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
[Illbay has] demonstrated abject moral and intellectual bankruptcy

Yes, but nobody exemplifies those traits better than you.

89 posted on 10/08/2001 10:11:36 AM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
What is the mainstream, if there is such a thing, libertarian view on pre-emptive force?

The mainstream libertarian view is simple common sense (as it is on most issues, really). A clear and present threat (either deliberate, such as someone brandishing a weapon, or negligent, such as someone driving while seriously impaired) justifies such action as may be necessary to disarm the threat.

Determining what constitutes a "threat" does call for some thought. For instance a neighbor with a gun is not (generally -- somone who has given indications of mental instability is another question) a threat, because a gun is a targeted weapon. A neighbor with a garage full of explosives is a threat, because explosives are dangerous to anyone within the blast radius.

90 posted on 10/08/2001 10:22:50 AM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Small Pox is far more of a threat than Anthrax ever will be! It is easily released, rapidly spread and absolutely devastating!

Here is an article from the 5th regarding the US government asking the only authorized producer of Small Pox vaccine to increase production.

US Asks small pox vaccine producer to increase production 10/05/2001

91 posted on 10/08/2001 10:25:23 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #92 Removed by Moderator

Comment #93 Removed by Moderator

Comment #94 Removed by Moderator

To: Texas Mom
Like most people over 30 I was vaccinated when I was a kid...are we then immune to infection?
95 posted on 10/08/2001 11:18:31 AM PDT by foreshadowed at waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
****Put on your Tin Foil hats****

I hope the British journalist who was just released didn't have some awful disease to spread...

96 posted on 10/08/2001 11:35:12 AM PDT by Snowy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
I don't have a dog in this fight, but I seem to remember some threads on Libertarian philosophy several months ago that discussed pre-emptive force and whether it was justified. As I remember, there are differing views within Libertarianism. What is the mainstream, if there is such a thing, libertarian view on pre-emptive force?

The initiation of force is immoral. Always.

However, if it is clear that an individual intends to initiate force against you, it is not incumbent upon you to wait until he strikes to utilize force in your own defense.

You may morally act in your own defense prior to being struck.

An analogy... If a mugger just shot the man next to you, then proceeds to raise a gun in your direction, it can clearly be assumed that the mugger has a hostile intent. This would morally entitle the use of force in your own defense.

I think the analogy applies quite readily here.

97 posted on 10/08/2001 11:35:31 AM PDT by OWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Much misinformation on this thread.

1) Most adults in this country are vaccinated. This means that if there is smallpox about, once they close the schools it will not spread very fast -- even old vaccinations protect you. There is a small chance an old vaccination won't if you receive a large exposure, and this phenomenon is the reason some states used to give booster shots, but smallpox booster shots were never considered a necessity, as they were with many other diseases.

2) Smallpox is not infectious until it is clinically apparent.

3) If you ARE exposed to someone with smallpox, and you get the vaccine within a couple of days, you have a good chance of avoiding getting sick.

4) The figures often given are that smallpox is 30% fatal, but with the modern medicine we have many more people would survive. As with most viral diseases, the key to survival is just to hang on long enough for your immune system to gear up sufficiently, then your body will kill the viruses and you will be immune (unfortunately retoviruses like HIV write themselves into your DNA so this doesn't apply to them).

All the above are reasons not to panic, but a smallpox is still a serious threat which requires that we prepare by manufacturing and distributing vaccines as fast as we can. However, I am more seriously worried about plague (not anthrax because it can't pass from person to person so any attack-induced epidemic will be very localized).

98 posted on 10/08/2001 11:55:33 AM PDT by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeritatisSplendor
did someone say plague?

Mystery epidemic kills hundreds in Afghanistan

Source: Afghan News
Date: Feb 22, 1999

Afghanistan has asked the World Health Organisation for help dealing with an epidemic that is killing dozens of people a day near the Tajik border in Afghanistan, a UN official disclosed here. Due to the gravity of the situation and fear that the epidemic might spread into more areas, the WHO is sending an urgent medical help to Afghanistan to help the authorities cope with the alarming situation.

The illness, thought perhaps to be plague or cholera, has spread during the last week through several impoverished villages in Badakhshan mountains of Afghanistan. A lack of qualified medical personnel and diagnostic equipment has complicated efforts to identity the disease. As a result dozens of people are dying everyday. However, the help is rather slow given the tense situation in Afghanistan and the security aspects as well. Plague is typically spread by rodents or other small animals. Untreated, it is often fatal, but it can be treated with antibiotics. Latest statistics show that over 2,000 people are affected by the epidemic. About 250 people have so far died due to lack of medical treatment. Symptoms of the epidemic are fever, cough, pain, vomiting and diarrhea, with elderly women and children the worst affected.

AFP adds: A "mystery disease" has killed 250 people in remote villages in northeast Afghanistan, a UN spokesman said Friday. Experts from the World Health Organization (WHO) plan to attempt to travel to the villages in the Darwaz region in the next few days, UN spokesman Fred Eckhard said. Last week officials in Darwaz told the WHO that 2,000 people were suffering from the illness, and that 250 of them had died. Symptoms of the sickness include fever, cough, aches, vomiting and diarrhea, he said. The WHO plans to send two epidemiologists to Dushanbe, in neighboring Tajikistan. From their they will attempt to reach the affected villages, he said. The villages, located in narrow valleys between high mountains, are normally accessible only by foot or on donkey, and take 10 days to reach, Eckhard said

99 posted on 10/08/2001 12:49:10 PM PDT by francisandbeans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Go in and blast Iraq: YES.

Deport the Terrorist Armies from the USA: YES.

Encourage private industry to quickly develop and market a smallpox vaccine: YES.

Those are my three votes on this subject.

100 posted on 10/08/2001 4:27:25 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson