But the drunk (who ALWAYS thinks he can hold his liquor, and is NEVER "impaired" unless you actually test him) protests his innocence to all who'll listen.
Ask Saddam. He'll tell you he's innocent, too.
I'm not a battler for "drunks to own the roads". Although I do think the ever shrinking limits are ridiculous and ineffective to their stated purpose, it's off topic for this thread.
I merely pointed out to you the difference in intent between the drunk and the evil dictator.