Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coleus
McVeigh had to protect his family and loved ones and never revealed the true story.

LOL!

You ignore EXACTLY what you want to and DISREGARD the extensive FOLLOWUP work done by these authors in corroborating Tim's story.

You also IGNORE the fact that a court of law complete with a jury of citizens FOUND Tim GUILTY beyond a SHADOW of a DOUBT.

Of course, you being an obvious conspiracy theorist of a rather high order and having no need for FACT, logic or reasoning in this matter can skip reading the book American Terrorist can continue fantasizing the with the aid of your fellow conspracy theorists ...

As to protecting his family, you haven't a clue what he put them through (AS documented in the book) as it was.

Though he maintains his position that he has no real regrets over his actions, McVeigh has confessed that he feels sorry for what happened to Nichols and Fortier. For all his planning and attention to detail, McVeigh had underestimated the power and breadth of federal conspiracy laws. He had acted under the naive assumption that as long as he delivered and detonated the bomb himself, no one else could be charged. The illegal act, he figured, was purely his own. McVeigh simply hadn't reckoned wth the law.

"I did not calculate or know enough about conspiracy law to know that my actions could be held against them," he says now. "Because, in a conspiracy, you're all in it as one. Other people's crimes can be held against you." He remains outraged that Fortier and Nichols could face such serious punishment when they had no idea when the bombing was to occur. Perhaps most significant is his claim that the two men had no way of knowing that McVeigh would bomb the building when it was full of people. Nichols never had control of the truck, or knew the time that the blast would occur. "I could have delivered it anytime," McVeigh says. "It was my choice, and my control, to hit that building when it was full, as opposed to eleven P.M.-or three A.M., when it would have been empty, except for possibly a security guard or cleaning crew." McVeigh acknowledges Nichols's involvement in the preparation of the bomb, if only to help dispel the lingering conspiracy theories that surround the case. But he maintains that Nichols's assistance in the mixing of the bomb components came under duress, only after McVeigh had threatened him and his family.


67 posted on 04/11/2003 4:29:38 PM PDT by _Jim ( // NASA has a better safety record than NASCAR \\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: _Jim
The book is a fairy tale. And I didn't say that he was not guilty nor that he didn't do it, I intimated that he had help and didn't act alone. LOL!
69 posted on 04/11/2003 4:36:15 PM PDT by Coleus (RU-486 Kills Babies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: _Jim; glorygirl

Click here for OKC BOMBING BUMP LIST 

 


74 posted on 04/11/2003 5:04:46 PM PDT by Coleus (RU-486 Kills Babies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: All
For Immediate Release
Apr 11, 2003
Contact: Press Office
202-646-5172




BUSH JUSTICE DEPARTMENT ARGUES IN FAVOR OF ALLOWING FORMER IRAQI UN AMBASSADOR TO FLEE THE COUNTRY

Al Douri Reportedly Bound for Damascus Via Paris Tonight

Law Enforcement & Intelligence Officials “Asleep at the Switch”


(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption and abuse, said today that the Bush Justice Department argued in favor of allowing former Iraqi United Nations (UN) Ambassador Mohammed al Douri to flee the United States and avoid pending legal proceedings, during an emergency telephonic hearing before U.S. District Court Judge John S. Martin, Jr. The emergency hearing was requested by Judicial Watch in order to bar Mr. al Douri from fleeing the United States this evening, Friday, April 11, 2003, as reported by the Associated Press, Reuters and Time magazine.

Mr. al Douri was subpoened as a material witness in the matter of V.Z. Lawton v. The Republic of Iraq, a lawsuit brought by Judicial Watch on behalf of survivors and victims of the Oklahoma City Bombing.Click Here for Brief A hearing concerning Mr. al Douri’s alleged contempt of court for unsuccessfully attempting to refuse personal service of subpoena by Judicial Watch on March 29, 2003, and for failing to appear for a deposition scheduled for April 7, 2003, was postponed until Wednesday, April 16, 2003 at 2:00PM, at the request of the Bush Justice Department. The Bush administration asked the court for the delay so that it could consider the issue of immunity and develop its legal position. Mr. al Douri’s legal immunity was nullified by The Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, (“Anti-Terrorism Act”) and other laws, which lifted the immunity of terrorist states and their representatives. With the collapse of Saddam Hussein’s regime, clearly Mr. al Douri is without portfolio. Judicial Watch will continue to pursue a contempt charge against Mr. al Douri, so that he will be jailed in the event he ever returns to the United States.

“Despite Mr. al Douri’s obvious value as a material witness in our case, one would think Bush administration law enforcement and intelligence officials would have a number of questions for Mr. al Douri concerning the regime of Saddam Hussein, terrorism and weapons of mass destruction. I am very troubled by the Bush Justice Department’s position in allowing Mr. al Douri to flee the country. I don’t think this is what the brave young men and women in our armed forces are fighting for in Iraq,” stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman.

76 posted on 04/11/2003 7:07:20 PM PDT by Coleus (RU-486 Kills Babies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson