Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HEARTLAND CONSPIRACY
LA Weekly | September 28, 2001 | JIM CROGAN

Posted on 10/07/2001 6:35:54 PM PDT by Wallaby

Not for commercial use. Solely to be used for the educational purposes of research and open discussion.

HEARTLAND CONSPIRACY
JIM CROGAN
LA Weekly; News; Pg. 15
September 28, 2001, Friday


It is obvious material for conspiracy buffs: Did Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols really act alone, or was some larger terrorist outfit behind the April 19, 1995, bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building?


According to a motion filed by McVeigh's defense team, an American fitting Nichols' description met with Yousef in 1992 or 1993 in the Philippines.
In Oklahoma City, an investigative reporter began asking the question long before the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Jayna Davis, in a series that aired on KFOR-TV in 1995, examined the possible existence of John Doe No. 2, a man witnesses saw with McVeigh outside the federal building moments before the bomb went off, killing 168 people. Her reports also raised questions about the purpose of several trips Nichols made to the Philippines, into areas in which terrorists linked to Osama bin Laden were known to hide out. Davis herself no longer freely talks about her work. She has been sued by a subject of her reports and advised by her attorneys not to grant interviews. Earlier this year, however, she appeared on Fox Network's The O'Reilly Factor and spoke at length about her investigation: "And what we discovered, an intelligence source at one of the highest levels in the federal government later confirmed, was a Middle Eastern terrorist cell living and operating in the heart of Oklahoma City . . . We have (22) sworn witness affidavits that tie seven to eight Arab men to various stages of the bombing plot . . . It really is a foreign conspiracy masterminded and funded by Osama bin Laden, according to my intelligence sources."

McVeigh went to his grave denying any foreign involvement in the bombing. His accomplice, Terry Nichols, swore they acted alone, and no proof of a wider plot ever surfaced.

The arrests of McVeigh and Nichols came quickly and closed the case for many. Less than two hours after the bombing, a state trooper stopped McVeigh's 1977 Mercury Marquis 80 miles from Oklahoma City because it was missing a license plate. Two days later, Nichols, who was at his Kansas farm on the day of the bombing, surrendered to police.

Minutes after the bombing, however, police radios carried a description of a brown Chevrolet pickup with "two Middle Eastern men" inside seen speeding away from the federal complex. A short time later and without explanation, police withdrew the all-points bulletin. The mystery over the truck became the starting point for Davis' investigation.

Davis found people in Oklahoma City who said they remembered seeing McVeigh meet with several men they describe as Middle Eastern in the months before the bombing. She also uncovered confidential warnings that a congressional task force issued about a possible Islamic-fundamentalist terror attack on "America's heartland" one month before the Oklahoma bombing.

Davis, in her early reports, makes it clear she is not certain of a connection between McVeigh and any terrorist group. And certainly witnesses were primed to view anyone who looked suspicious as "Middle Eastern" in the hours right after the bombing. What Davis wants, she said, is a full federal inquiry into the matter. One big-name lawyer trying to get such an investigation rolling is David Schippers, former chief counsel to the House of Representatives managers who conducted Bill Clinton's impeachment trial. "I've been practicing law for 40 years, and I know what bullshit is," said Schippers. "Jayna gave me a stack of affidavits, signed by credible witnesses, connecting McVeigh to Middle Easterners living in Oklahoma City. She also gave me a ton of supporting documents. I've reviewed this material, and I'm convinced there are solid leads here that need to be investigated."

Schippers said he is trying to get the material to U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft. "I made some calls, but no one would give me the time of day," he said. "I tried like hell to get to Ashcroft, but I just couldn't break through." He said he has not given up, but would not disclose his plans to get a full airing for Davis' findings.

The reports, which aired on KFOR in the months after the Oklahoma City bombing, are based on witness statements, court records, government documents and unnamed sources. A federal court order dismissing a lawsuit filed against Davis mentioned several of her findings, which include:

It is not clear how or whether all of this adds up. Davis has struggled to get the results of her investigation to the public. Twice, she has been sued for libel and defamation, in state and federal courts, by Al-Hussaini, who stepped forward on June 15, 1995, and said that he was living in fear since KFOR and Davis fingered him. He said he was at work when the bombing occurred and denied knowing McVeigh. The federal judge who dismissed his lawsuit said Al-Hussaini's claim that he was at work at the time of the bombing was false.

Nineteen months after Al-Hussaini sued in state court, he dropped his lawsuit. Davis said the legal pressure led KFOR to halt airing new material from her bombing investigation. In 1996, Palmer Communications sold the station to the New York Times Co., which was not interested in pursuing the story, Davis said. On March 3, 1997, she resigned.

In September 1997, Davis was subpoenaed by the Oklahoma County grand jury, which was looking into the possibility of conspirators in the bombing. Davis gave the jury all of her witness statements. The next day, Al-Hussaini refiled his libel suit in federal court, and two months later, it was dismissed. U.S. District Judge Tim Leonard said that Davis' reports are either true or statements of opinion. Al-Hussaini appealed, and a hearing was held this month, but no ruling has been made.

For years, the FBI has refused to comment on Davis' report. This week, the response was no different when the agency was contacted by the L.A. Weekly. Davis has tried twice, with the permission of her sources, to deliver the 22 witness affidavits to the FBI office in Oklahoma City. In 1997, agents said her lawyers needed to first contact federal prosecutors. Her attorney, Tim McCoy, said federal prosecutors rejected the offer, saying they would have to release the documents to McVeigh's and Nichols' defense teams if they accepted them. In 1999, Davis and another attorney who represented her, Dan Nelson, met with Agent Dan Vogel and got him to accept the documents. He, in turn, gave them to the FBI task force investigating the bombing. "However, I was told we gave the affidavits back to her because there was some question of ownership -- whether she or KFOR had legal rights to the material," said Vogel, who has since retired. Asked whether he thought it was odd that the FBI would reject potential leads, Vogel would only say, "That was a decision made by people above me."

Davis can't figure out why the FBI refuses to examine her material. "They had hundreds of agents on this case," Davis told Bill O'Reilly. "Why wouldn't they want to take information from a reporter who had sworn witness statements implicating . . . others in the Oklahoma City bombing?"



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fredthompson; mcveigh; okcbombing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last
To: Wallaby
Davis and Schippers were on Tulsa's KFAQ this morning.....

I'd really like to see something come of this....But certainly NOT holding my breath.

FRegards,

81 posted on 05/06/2005 5:14:48 PM PDT by Osage Orange (Bill Clinton's heart is blacker than the devil's riding boots.....................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Don
Conspiracy nut, you are!

Well....you may as well call me one too. Ha!!

There's more to the OK City bombing than we now know....or my name is Rock Bottom.

82 posted on 05/06/2005 5:20:58 PM PDT by Osage Orange (Bill Clinton's heart is blacker than the devil's riding boots.....................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: IslamoCommieObserver
He works for the ACLU and/or CAIR now. (end sarcasm)

lol!

83 posted on 05/06/2005 7:03:07 PM PDT by Nita Nupress (Maybe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Nita Nupress

Fancy seeing you dredging up a dead thread ;)


84 posted on 05/06/2005 7:05:54 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

That's my middle name. :-) (At least when it comes to OKC.)

Hey, wait a minute... You're here too, ya know. lol!


85 posted on 05/06/2005 7:08:11 PM PDT by Nita Nupress (Maybe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek

I wuz lookin' fer sumthin. :-)


86 posted on 05/06/2005 7:09:36 PM PDT by Nita Nupress (Definitely not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

Comment #87 Removed by Moderator

To: IslamoCommieObserver

Whatever it is, it must be good. :-)


88 posted on 05/06/2005 7:11:13 PM PDT by Nita Nupress (What's it to ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Nita Nupress

Ya still got a link to the "orphan thread"?


89 posted on 05/06/2005 7:11:40 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek

I haven't the slightest idea to that which you refer.


90 posted on 05/06/2005 7:13:28 PM PDT by Nita Nupress (If you say so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Nita Nupress
I'm assuming you're not being sarcastic.

It was a heartfelt thread posted just after 9/11 that never received any replies until about two years later.

91 posted on 05/06/2005 7:18:04 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
Hey, do you ever get the feeling you're talking to someone whom you know from a previous screen name? You know that they know who you are, and they know that you don't know who they are.

I think you and I should change our screen names and not tell anyone but each each other. Then we could sit here and talk to people whom we've known for several years, all the while knowing that they don't know who they're really talking to. Whaddaya think? :-)

92 posted on 05/06/2005 7:19:34 PM PDT by Nita Nupress (If you say so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
I'm assuming you're not being sarcastic. It was a heartfelt thread posted just after 9/11 that never received any replies until about two years later.

Hmm... I don't think I remember that one. I must have been taking a shower or something. Now you have me curious...

93 posted on 05/06/2005 7:20:48 PM PDT by Nita Nupress (If you say so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek

Here, this may help you find it. LOL!

http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=site%3Awww.freerepublic.com+nita+pardek&sm=Yahoo%21+Search&fr=FP-tab-web-t&toggle=1


94 posted on 05/06/2005 7:22:57 PM PDT by Nita Nupress (If you say so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Nita Nupress
I must have been taking a shower or something.

What are the odds of that? < /dog gone >

You're the one who found it!

95 posted on 05/06/2005 7:24:33 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek; Dammit

Yeah, I remember it now. But I have no clue what the topic was, do you? I wouldn't even know where to start looking. I got sidetracked looking at some of those old threads, anyway.

Whatever happened to that FReeper named Dammit? And did you ever find out his first name?


96 posted on 05/06/2005 7:30:17 PM PDT by Nita Nupress (If you say so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Nita Nupress
"Whatever happened to that FReeper named Dammit? And did you ever find out his first name?"

Comedy's my game, sister. Just stand there smiling and being blonde and don't try to tell jokes - life will be easy for you.

97 posted on 05/06/2005 7:36:06 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek

I'm not joking. Dammit, he's real!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/user-posts?id=30993


98 posted on 05/06/2005 7:39:50 PM PDT by Nita Nupress (I don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

Comment #99 Removed by Moderator

To: Nita Nupress

I sense a conspiracy, sister.


100 posted on 05/06/2005 7:41:45 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson