You just don't get it, do you?
On second thought, you do get it.
And you think it is a reasonable idea.
Could it be that you one of those giving the orders to our 'differently abled" protectors?
Is this the best solution you could come up with?
"Mindless automatons, your leader demands that you profile/detain anyone saying these words..."
It could be that I think it is unbelievably stupid to go to an airport now and talk about bombs and expect you will get no reaction! I urge you to go down to the airport and start talking about bombs. If you don't have an airport nearby go to a movie theatre and yell fire.
Now I need to get back to oppressing. It is a hard job but someone has to do it. My automatons look leaderless. "Hey frisk that ninety year old man lackey" "That six year old kid fits the profile"
I recognise the need for effective security,
but do not understand how by not uttering certain words to 'official' staff
I or anyone else is made safer. Please explain
You'll recall that the gentleman in question did NOT indescriminantly shout out the word 'Bomb' inthe airport, as is implied by your reference to shouting "Fire" in a theatre.
Again, am I to believe that because no one is permitted to say certain words, my personal safety is enhanced?
How?