Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

War veteran charged after bomb comment
The Globe and Mail ^ | Thursday, October 4, 2001 | Canadian Press

Posted on 10/04/2001 8:54:19 AM PDT by jalisco555

CHARLOTTETOWN -- An 81-year-old man is facing a criminal charge and has been banned from flying with Air Canada for life after asking a baggage handler in Charlottetown whether she was looking for a bomb in his wife's change purse.

Elmer Blanchard, a frail Second World War veteran, thought it was an innocent question. He was wrong.

Minutes later, he was arrested by Charlottetown city police, charged with uttering bomb threats and taken to the police station, photographed and fingerprinted.

His wife, Albina, was hauled into a separate room, questioned and informed that her husband was being charged under the Criminal Code and that neither of them would be allowed to fly with Air Canada again.

Mrs. Blanchard said she's shocked, and now worried about her husband's health.

Since the incident Monday, she said, her husband won't eat, has stopped talking and just lies there -- sometimes with tears in his eyes.

The decorated veteran had never been in trouble with the law. Now, he faces a court hearing in Charlottetown next month. The maximum penalty for a conviction on the offence is two years in jail.

"I'm telling you, I don't know if I can go through this," Mrs. Blanchard said, choking back tears.

"He didn't mean it. He just said it as a matter of speech. She was looking through this little bag of mine. There was jewellery in there and there was money in there . . . and Elmer was right behind me, and he said 'Are you looking for a bomb?' "

The Blanchards summer in their hometown of Tignish, PEI, and spend the winters in Dundas, Ont.

After being released from police custody, the Blanchards booked a flight on Canada 3000 out of Moncton.

Their daughter, Gail McMillan, who lives in Paris, Ont., said she believes that security officials overreacted.

Ms. McMillan was supposed to pick up her parents at the airport in Toronto when she received a call saying that they were not on board the plane.

"All the man said -- and I shouldn't say 'all' because he shouldn't have said it -- but all he said was 'Are you looking for a bomb?' " Ms. McMillan said. "He's an 81-year-old man who has never, ever, ever had a brush with the law, who was in the war for five years. He's in shock. He just can't believe that he could be in so much trouble for making that comment."

Charlottetown Police Constable Gary Clow said that in light of what happened in the United States, the police department couldn't take any chances. But he said any time such a statement is made, the police are called.

Mike Campbell, general manager of the Charlottetown Airport Authority, said the matter is out of his hands. He did say that such incidents are "very, very rare" for the Island's main airport.

Mr. Campbell said the airport's security measures were in place well before the terrorist attacks and have not been changed.

Mrs. Blanchard said she's trying to find a lawyer and figure out how they can get back to the Island for the court appearance. Air Canada is the only airline to fly into Prince Edward Island regularly.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: jalisco555
"An 81-year-old man is facing a criminal charge . . . after asking a baggage handler in Charlottetown whether she was looking for a bomb in his wife's change purse."

If the man were a New Yorker, I would assume that the question was asked with a tone of sarcasm (as in "How exactly are we going to fit a bomb in a 2" by 3" purse, and why are you snooping through my wife's change?") On the basis of his reaction, however, it appears that he was asking an entirely innocuous question about security procedures, or perhaps trying to make a joke. Unfortunately, no one takes himself quite so seriously as a petty bureaucrat. What a power rush these minimum wage cretins must get from being able to order the arrest of their betters.

Zero Tolerance (aka Zero Common Sense) rears its ugly head once more.

21 posted on 10/04/2001 9:16:21 AM PDT by Goetz_von_Berlichingen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
The sky is falling!

Another addition for the absurdity file.

22 posted on 10/04/2001 9:17:28 AM PDT by NoCurrentFreeperByThatName
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Justin Thyme
"I do believe the old man is guilty of being criminally stupid as well"

Criminally stupid? An 81 year old man probably doesn't even know that there are now english words that are politically incorrect. The only criminally stupid individuals here are the supposed security proffesional that couldn't tell their butt from their elbow, let alone find a bomb.

23 posted on 10/04/2001 9:21:36 AM PDT by ScreamingFist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555
I'd insult Canadians if I thought it couldn't happen here, but we Americans can be just as asinine. 81 year-old, WWII vet terrorists. Yep, there's legions of them, and they have numerous cells in Canada. (/sarcasm)
24 posted on 10/04/2001 9:23:54 AM PDT by freedomcrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Goetz_von_Berlichingen
"What a power rush these minimum wage cretins must get from being able to order the arrest of their betters."

Well said my friend. Excellent profile also :)

25 posted on 10/04/2001 9:26:25 AM PDT by ScreamingFist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555
Fun and Games are Over...



Fun and Games are Over...

26 posted on 10/04/2001 9:27:31 AM PDT by bluetoad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrBambaLaMamba
Oooooh!, I feel safer, knowing I'm not allowed to say that word anymore.

I, for one, refuse to be forced into always having to say ".. a really, really, really lousy movie."

Can we coin a new phrase since "bomb" has been outlawed?

27 posted on 10/04/2001 9:28:52 AM PDT by been_lurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555
This is not stupid, this is a situation of retardedness. I am scared crapless that a bunch of retards are screening us.

South Park is no joke, when the cop walks around without pants and says sorry when he bumps into a criminal beating on grandma to death on the street, we have a real representation of how retarded the world has become. The so called elite finds even value in Larry Flint ... so go figure where reality is in those people's minds. They are like retards.

28 posted on 10/04/2001 9:32:36 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScreamingFist
I hear ya. And I tried to make it clear that the authorities were idiots. I'm just saying that we aren't letting 14-16 year olds get off for murder these days, and treating them like adults. Since the guy is so bent out of shape over this, it would seem like he's not suffering from senility, so that isn't a defence. Unless he hasn't watched TV or read newspapers for the last couple decades, and is blind so that he can't read the numerous signs in the airport which let you know that those comments aren't allowed....just not quite so eager to relieve him of any responsibility at all either. Just saying that you can't over-react, without an initial action to react to.
29 posted on 10/04/2001 9:39:15 AM PDT by Justin Thyme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555
Since the incident Monday, she said, her husband won't eat, has stopped talking and just lies there -- sometimes with tears in his eyes.

How sad. Bullsh*t that these security measures were in place before the attacks. This was probably the first time security had ever searched the old lady, and her husband said something he probably shouldn't have.
30 posted on 10/04/2001 9:42:49 AM PDT by tenderstone jr.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
"...I am scared crapless that a bunch of retards are screening us... "

'Retard' is also on the PC list of sacred "Evil" utterances.
I believe the correct term is 'Mentally Disabled',
No..it's 'Mentally Challenged'...no,
Hmmm...'Special', that's it 'Special'.

I also feel "safer" knowing that we are protected by these 'Special' folk.

31 posted on 10/04/2001 9:50:50 AM PDT by MrBambaLaMamba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: jalisco555
Expect this old guy to be on the BATF's hit list. He is their optimum targeting age.
33 posted on 10/04/2001 9:53:18 AM PDT by SuperLuminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrBambaLaMamba
I also feel "safer" knowing that we are protected by these 'Special' folk

I believe the proper term is "differently abled".

34 posted on 10/04/2001 9:53:42 AM PDT by jalisco555
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: jalisco555
Case dismissed. Even the most draconian reading of "bomb threat" laws show that this man was asking a QUESTION, not making a statement. Under the theory used here, a concerned passenger asking "I hope you make sure no one tries to sneak a bomb onboard" would be subject to arrest.
36 posted on 10/04/2001 10:01:39 AM PDT by rdww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555
OK, anything to be inclusive.

"I feel "safer" knowing that we are protected by these 'differently abled' folk."

I have updated my list of sacred "Evil" utterances to reflect the latest changes.

37 posted on 10/04/2001 10:03:22 AM PDT by MrBambaLaMamba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555
Good thing he wasn't pointing a chicken finger at the airport worker. Then he'd really really be in trouble.
38 posted on 10/04/2001 10:07:15 AM PDT by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoCurrentFreeperByThatName
See what 'safety' and 'security' will buy you in the long run? Time in the slammer. The hysteria level is reaching asinine proportions.
39 posted on 10/04/2001 10:07:44 AM PDT by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Nov3
Oh yeah! An over reaction but still should have had more sense than to say bomb

My Dad is 80 years old and a WWII Vet. he still calls fly spray "bug bomb" or just "bomb" (An expression from WWII). I'm glad he doesen't fly much anymore (he used to carry fly spray in his luggage when he went to Florida)

40 posted on 10/04/2001 10:11:09 AM PDT by PA_hayseed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson