Replies

When I protested with my "Sore Loserman" sign in Times Square last winter (five hours a night for a month), I noticed a HUGE difference in the women who supported Bush and those who were against Bush.

The anti-Bush women were ugly, mannish sorts with anger written all over them. The pro-Bush women were beautiful, sexy, affluent and -- like Laura Bush -- they truly sparkled.

That's my observation -- don't ask me to explain it!

The anti-Bush women were ugly, mannish sorts with anger written all over them. The pro-Bush women were beautiful, sexy, affluent and -- like Laura Bush -- they truly sparkled.
Fits right in there with Rush's Undeniable truth of life # 25:
"Feminism was established to give ugly women easier access to the marketplace ..."

I am not attracted to women but being a woman, I notice looks in a sisterly way, and I have noticed that conservative women don't have to be stunning to be attractive; they are usually so nice that their sweetness makes them more attractive. On the other hand, liberal women, I'm not talking about the common confused liberal, I'm talking about the ideologues, they usually look so mean that even though their features might be attractive, they look mean and ugly most of the time, case in point Hitlery or Maxine Waters, the expressions on their faces make them look nothing less than witchy. You can't call them ugly, but would you want to take a job under any of them. I wouldn't want to even deliver their mail! When all the Democratic Congress women get together, they look like a coven.