Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southack
One could say the same thing about various automobiles over the years, yet it wasn't the cars per se which evolved, but rather the DESIGNERS of the cars evolved.

There's no evidence for cars coming into being via reproductive acts by other cars. Living things seldom come into being except by the reproductive acts of other living things. So where does it make sense to put the evolution?

150 posted on 09/27/2001 1:18:27 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro
"There's no evidence for cars coming into being via reproductive acts by other cars. Living things seldom come into being except by the reproductive acts of other living things. So where does it make sense to put the evolution?"

That would seem to say that Life is necessary as a prior condition for Evolution to proceed. Thus, you have just given credibility to the concept that a living Designer is required as a precursor for both Evolution and Life.

156 posted on 09/27/2001 1:24:20 PM PDT by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson