Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Iwo Jima
The problem is that they have to identify a phone number in connection with the tap. What's not to understand. I've typed search warrants have you? They're dreadful. I think Ashcroft has a great idea. Its easy to buy a phone now days, I almost bought one at my local grocery store.
130 posted on 09/24/2001 2:33:12 PM PDT by marajade (maraskywalker@earthlink.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: marajade
"they have to identify a phone number in connection with the tap.."

And is that so much to ask? Are you saying that government should be able to tap any phone it wants to without even having to describe the line and make a case for why that particular phone line is connected to a person reasonably suspected of a crime? A warrant must particularly describe the place or thing to be serached or seized. If it does not, it is an unreasonable search which is prohibited by the Constitution. Our Supreme Court, especially Justices Thomas and Scalia, know that and also know that our Constitutional rights are paramount.
150 posted on 09/24/2001 3:07:00 PM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson