Posted on 09/24/2001 3:10:00 AM PDT by Ada Coddington
Unfree Republic
by Jeff Elkins
Let the stench of Middle East flesh reach Paradise reassuring them that these filth have gone to hell permanently."
The quote above is representative of many posted on the FreeRepublic.com site in the wake of the WTC attack, and unfortunately its like is not uncommon elsewhere. Americans are angry, predictably and rightly so, but just as predictable are the side effects. As always, that righteous anger will be accepted as a beloved gift by the state and molded into tools of oppression.
It’s funny how that works. Every single state-sponsored war the US has become embroiled in has resulted in an inexorable increase in the power of the state.
It’s also funny that it’s always assumed that human behavior in the past has no relation to how we behave today. Why those people were old-fashioned, we’re modern, educated, etc.
The beginning of this repeating pattern has already become public with the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security. It has an ominous sound, that name, almost Germanic. (I can’t wait to see the uniforms.)
On April 13, 1917, days after our entry into World War One, President Wilson created the Committee on Public Information to promote the war domestically while publicizing American war aims abroad. Bush has replicated that step, with this new cabinet-level department.
Under the leadership of journalistic muckraker George Creel, the CPI was a propaganda apparatus unparalleled at that point in world history. The CPI functioned as a de facto public censor, vetting nearly all published material about the war and helping to draft legislation such as the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918. In the months prior to our entry into the war and especially after our entry when they were nearly criminal, antiwar viewpoints were rarely heard.
The same pattern emerges now: Penn. Gov. Tom Ridge will be President Bush’s George Creel, and just as in those dim days of yesteryear, he’ll have plenty of willing civilian accomplices. And after all, there’s so much more to censor -- Ridge will need all the help he can get. In seeking warriors for the front line of Internet censorship, Ridge needs look no farther than FreeRepublic.com. The atmosphere there is now poisonous.
Again, look back to Wilson's CPI. It encouraged businesses to spy on their employees, parents to spy on their children, children to spy on their parents, neighbors to spy on neighbors, and above all to report "disloyal," pro-German sentiments. State authorities banned the teaching of German in schools and changed German street names. As the madness mounted, those regarded as pro-German were hounded from their jobs, pressured to change their German names, beaten, and in a few cases lynched. Almost all cases of violence, while incited by the state, were carried out by "civilians" in the grip of war hysteria.
Along with this anti-German hysteria, Congress passed several measures designed to rigidly suppress criticism of the war. In particular, the Espionage Act, passed in June 1917, specified a fine of $10,000 or twenty years in prison for "whoever, when the United States is at war, shall willfully obstruct the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States, and whoever, when the United States is at war, shall willfully utter, print, write, or publish any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the form of government of the United States, or the military or naval forces of the United States, or the flag."
The Espionage Act was very popular in its day. It was cheered on by mindless lemmings under the influence of state propaganda. Their great grandchildren now inhabit FreeRepublic.com, viciously attacking anyone who questions the wisdom of the state.
Our Congress is considering similar measures under the rubric of "anti-terrorism," and as it was at the beginning of the 20th Century, the FreeRepublic lemmings of the 21st are cheering the morally corrupt politicians along.
It’s not just message posters on the site. The management of FreeRepublic has instituted a "loose lips sink ships" campaign, with new moderators patrolling the forum to delete posts that in their opinion are detrimental to the "war effort."
The FreeRepublic mission statement claims "We're working to roll back decades of governmental largesse, to root out political fraud and corruption, and to champion causes which further conservatism in America."
Sanctimonious hogwash. Everything old is new again – the keyboard warriors of FreeRepublic would be right at home in 1917 shilling for Wilson.
September 24, 2001
Jeff Elkins is a freelance consultant and writer living in North Central Florida. His personal website is located at www.elkins.org.
You've intentionally mis-characterized this policy.
Good point...the FR I came to know and love is falling apart.
While at LewRockwell.com, go to Last Week and click on Tuesday; read: "A reign of terror in defense of freedom" by Joseph Stromberg.
Except Kabul but to be fair to you, you did believe it was the C&C center for the Taliban.
Tony
Rockwellism is an armchair philosophy. The lonely Rockwellite sitting comfortably in his den assumes everyone else is as secure as he is. Unfortunately this hasn't always been true throughout history. There are moments of crisis when action is necessary. The Rockwellite in his barcalounger presumes that if you leave things as they are and do nothing, then nothing will change. This belief is preferable to the conviction of some that they must always be doing or changing things. But some times not to act is to lose everything. Patience and negotiation are advisable, but the patience of a nation isn't infinite and there are moments when it is finally broken. And it isn't just that our government wants power and manufactures crises to get it. There really are people out there who do mean us harm.
Rockwellism traces its roots back to Cobden and other idealistic or utopian 19th century economists. You can see parallel developments in Charles Beard and other turn of the century radicals and in the New Left of the 1960s. The central tenent of Rockwellism is that one's own government is to blame and that with it out of the way things will all run much more smoothly. Another assumption is that nobody wants to get us because we are rich, or free or arrogant.
Sooner or later these assumptions are called radically into question. For Norman Angell and other latter-day Cobdenites, it was 1914. For Beard, Barnes, Nock and their generations it was 1941. For the New Left, it was Afghanistan. For the Rockheads, it is now. Some of these people rose to the challenge, others did not. Neither course -- involvement or isolation -- is a priori right or right in all cases. Sometimes the crisis may not be real. I don't regard WWI as anything we should have got involved in. But I think the crisis and the need for action is real and serious now, as it was in the 40s, and as I thought it was in the 80s.
In any case, I wouldn't assume such moments never happen. Rockwellism really doesn't engage with history or with the present. The guy in the pannelled den with his drink and his bust of L von Mises could be a great person, the salt of the earth, but he doesn't have much of a clue about the real passions and dangers that nations and peoples confront over time.
Right-on Jim!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.