Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US lost spy plane over Afghanistan: defense secretary
Yahoo! News ^ | Sept. 23, 2001 | AFP

Posted on 09/23/2001 10:03:55 AM PDT by Old Lady

WASHINGTON, Sept 23 (AFP) - The United States lost a spy plane over Afghanistan, US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said Sunday, playing down claims that forces of that country's ruling Taliban militia shot down the aircraft.

"The US have lost contact with an unmanned aerial vehicle," Rumsfeld told journalists after appearing on a talk show early Sunday.

"That happens from time to time in terms of control. We have no reasons to believe it was shot down," he said.

Afghanistan's ruling Taliban militia on Saturday claimed its forces shot down a US spy plane in the northern Samangan province.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 09/23/2001 10:03:55 AM PDT by Old Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Old Lady
You beat me buy a couple minutes. :-)

Previous posts:
Taliban again say shot down unmanned spy plane
Taliban say downs alliance helicopter,not US plane
Taliban claim shooting down of unmanned spy plane: report (more in depth news)
Spy Plane Shot Down Over Afghanistan
Taliban claims they shot down unmanned recon plane!

2 posted on 09/23/2001 10:07:33 AM PDT by michigander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: michigander
Thanks for posting all those links.

Here's the version from Chicken Noodle News -- has more detail. Rumsfeld argues here that we lost contact with the unmanned plane and that does not necessarily mean it was shot down.

http://www.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/central/09/23/ret.afghan.plane/

Sources: Downed drone spied for CIA
September 23, 2001 Posted: 12:36 PM EDT (1636 GMT)
From Jamie McIntyre, CNN Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- U.S. government sources indicate to CNN that the unmanned spy plane downed by the Taliban on Saturday was providing intelligence for the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency.

Afghanistan's ruling Taliban militia claims its forces shot down an unmanned spy plane in Samangan and a helicopter in areas where opposition fighters had launched an attack. The Taliban said the plane contained computerized equipment and the wreckage will be brought to Kandahar.

U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld admitted that the Pentagon has lost contact with an unmanned drone, but said, "That happens from time to time."

"There's no reason to think it was shot down, as the press is reporting," he said.

The Taliban ambassador to Pakistan said Taliban forces used captured Soviet anti-aircraft guns to bring down the plane.

Two U.S. unmanned aerial vehicles have been lost over Iraq this year, while on surveillance missions. Iraq claims to have shot down the UAVs in late August and most recently on September 11.

The most common type of UAV or "drone" is the Predator aircraft, which flies at lower altitudes, making it more vulnerable to anti-aircraft attack. The small, $3.2 million pilotless plane normally operates at 10,000 to 15,000 feet and is capable of flying a maximum of 24 to 30 hours.

3 posted on 09/23/2001 10:16:15 AM PDT by Old Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Old Lady
Chicken Noodle News

HA!

4 posted on 09/23/2001 10:24:25 AM PDT by michigander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Old Lady
Whew, over $3,000,000???? That seems pretty expensive.
5 posted on 09/23/2001 10:27:24 AM PDT by parsifal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Old Lady
A very misleading "teaser" headline on the part of Yahoo.

A "spy plane" implies manned flight. These unmanned drones are the military equivalent of throw-away Dixie Cups.

6 posted on 09/23/2001 10:31:12 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Old Lady
No need to worry. Computers are strictly illegal in Afghanistan. The remains will be burned and hung from a tree lest someone gets polluted by Western technology.
9 posted on 09/23/2001 10:36:22 AM PDT by Cleburne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
$3.2 million "Dixie Cups?"

I wonder what the "good stuff" costs!

10 posted on 09/23/2001 10:37:04 AM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Old Lady
No big deal. That's why we invested in unmanned technology. To paraphrase the Doritos commercial "don't worry, we'll make more."
11 posted on 09/23/2001 10:40:11 AM PDT by krb (krb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Lady
These things are exactly what one of the posts above said, throw away dixie cups. They are SLOW!! less then 200 miles an hour I think. But they are loaded with equipment.

We have lots more where that one came from. A stinger missile could takeone of these things out in a heartbeat.

The Taliban will celebrate, just as Iraq does, but it isn't too hard to shoot one of these things down, and if they did shoot it down, well, more power to them. We have many other things that they won't be able to touch.
12 posted on 09/23/2001 10:42:09 AM PDT by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: Old Lady
...normally operates at 10,000 to 15,000 feet...

That's below ground in a lot of places in Afghanistan. The craft wasn't shot down. It was gang-tackled.

14 posted on 09/23/2001 10:46:22 AM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stboz
That's below ground in a lot of places in Afghanistan. The craft wasn't shot down. It was gang-tackled.

ROFL!!!

15 posted on 09/23/2001 10:53:28 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Old Lady
These things are designed with the hope, of course, that they won't be shot down, but the expectation that many will. The whole point of their being pilotless was so there would be loss of equipment but no loss of life.

Remote piloting technology is probably where the majority of the cost comes from. I imagine there's some pretty serious surveillance equipment aboard and that's where the rest of the cost comes from. The other issue of cost is, of course, quantity produced. The cost is all the research, development and production divided by the number produced. (Incidentally, that's how we get 35,000 dollar toilets. They design a new john to fit a new aircraft or submarine, and you divide all design, development, research costs by the number produced.)

As this type war continues, where surveillance is so important, I would predict that many more of these will be ordered, and that that will drive production costs down.

16 posted on 09/23/2001 10:54:59 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: animus
$3,000,000 should not be considered disposable

1. The $3,000,000 is the total development and production cost divided by the total buy. The next one off the assembly line will be substantially cheaper.

2. What do you think the total cost of training troops, inserting them, losing them and paying off their survivors is?

War is expensive and hi tech war particularly so. Get used to it. The alternative is to send you in with a knife, a gun and a backpack filled with C-rations.

17 posted on 09/23/2001 10:56:07 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cleburne
I couldn't have said it better!
18 posted on 09/23/2001 11:05:04 AM PDT by Ready2signup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Old Lady
Lots of good info on UAVs here.
19 posted on 09/23/2001 11:25:52 AM PDT by Straight Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: animus
"$3,000,000 should not be considered disposable. That kind of waste sickens me."

Don't worry. That's only the suggested retail price.

20 posted on 09/23/2001 11:28:25 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson