Some local peaceniks are suggesting that only "ground troops" be
used against the terrorist camps, to keep the harm to the innocent
down.
Apparently they haven't heard or understood what "collateral damage"
is in war lingo.
To put our people in harms way, as we did in 'Nam, would be a disgrace
beyond disgrace. Our job is to eradicate terrorists and terrorist's
training camps. Those that chose to support them are as much this World's
enemy as the terrorists themselves.
As GW put it: "Either you're with us, or against us".
Pray tell, oh wise judge of human intent from 10,000 miles distant, how do we distinguish those who assist the terrorists for ideological reasons from those who are being forced to do so at gunpoint?