Skip to comments.
'Bombing' of TWA Flight 800: Reed Irvine reveals new admissions by Stephanopoulos and Kallstrom
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| Thursday, September 20, 2001
| Reed Irvine
Posted on 09/20/2001 12:47:40 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
To: JohnHuang2
Here we go again!
41
posted on
09/20/2001 5:39:30 AM PDT
by
verity
To: JohnHuang2
... the crash of TWA Flight 800 killed 230 people....
I don't think it was the crash that killed them.
42
posted on
09/20/2001 5:41:26 AM PDT
by
aruanan
To: JohnHuang2
1) Pan AM 103 over Scotland
2) TWA Flight 800 off of New York
3) Egypt Air flight 900 off of New York.
4) Now the Twin Towers atrocity in New York using
American air carriers.
Commercial air travel has not been safe for Americans for quite awhile and the U.S. Government
knows this. No doubt in my mind that the Feds have been covering up this lack of security.
Particularly, the Clinton Administration.
43
posted on
09/20/2001 5:57:42 AM PDT
by
StormEye
To: DoughtyOne
The shock has caused the liars to tell the truth for once.
44
posted on
09/20/2001 6:46:06 AM PDT
by
Kermit
To: JohnHuang2
...Bump it, all day!
45
posted on
09/20/2001 7:02:24 AM PDT
by
gargoyle
To: acehai, SKYDRIFTER, FormerLurker, rwz, smorgle, carenot, tymesup
fyi
46
posted on
09/20/2001 7:12:27 AM PDT
by
LSJohn
To: jamaksin
Research the "Gulf of Tonkin Resolution;" therein lies the truth you're after. Billions to Texas.
To: StormEye
For a real eye-opener, see -
Airline Safety Net
- look to the Attack on America link.
You're on the right track. The dots are connected in fact; broken by propaganda; and a relatively new propaganda science called "Perception Control," borrowed from 'magic' shows.
To: JohnHuang2
bump
To: wirestripper
Everyone connected with the loss of TWA's 747 has known from the earliest days after the aircraft was lost that the primary cause of the explosion was a walked on terrorist bomb.
American Spectator reported it in explicit detail within months -- and reported also that the RICO-racketeer Gore/Clinton/DNC organized-criminal enterprises AKA the Clinton "administration" had [In order the airlines evade having to meet the cost of needed upgrades to the insane bloody joke which -- until last Tuesday anyway -- was called "airport security"] -- been paid off by the airlines to corrupt the "investigation" of the "accident."
The criminal corruption engaged in by the airlines, the "administration" and the various agencies sewed the Evil wind whose first-cut whirlwind was reaped last Tuesday!
And, now that the consequences of their own corrupt actions have returned to haunt them -- and have directly involved them in around 6000 murders -- the same bloody airlines are lined up at the public trough demanding to be compensated by their victims for the outcome of their foul and obscenely criminal corruption.
Guess they take their lessons from their Peking buds -- and send the bill for the executioners' bullets to their victims' homes.
To: JohnHuang2
So, finally, the truth begins to come out.
If I were Kallstrom I would get a lawyer and negotiate to not get prosecuted for lying to Congress. He needs to tell WHO gave him the orders to lie and WHO gave him the orders to stifle a national security informant.
To: Lockbox
Maybe a navy accident which will now be blamed on terorists?
52
posted on
09/20/2001 9:01:01 AM PDT
by
gjenkins
To: JohnHuang2
Sounds to me as if the Clinton era cover up artists are going to their fall back position. Now that we know terrorists can attack aircraft it seems much more desirable to blame 800 on terrorists than have people believe our own missile downed the plane. If terrorists are to blame we can't blame anyone in the Clinton administration for not knowing or covering up. Not so with a missile shot.
I don't have an idea as to what caused the 800 disaster. Just doesn't seem the fuel tank theory carries any credibility. Now that the spin artists are talking about bombing and terrorist attacks makes me more curious about their goal.
53
posted on
09/20/2001 9:11:56 AM PDT
by
FreePaul
To: JohnHuang2
No conspiracy theories here, just speculation: If TWA800 had been infected with suicidal terrorists - especially suicidal terrorists with a bomb - shooting it down would have been a military judgement call. Covering it up after the fact would be a national security judgement call. Although there's no evidence that Flight 93 over PA went down as a result of heroic action be passengers, we now know that the order had been given to fire upon it if it did not retreat from its vector toward Washington.
To: Harrison Bergeron
Damn! Think
then type! Think
then type!
No conspiracy theories here, just speculation: If TWA800 had been infected with suicidal terrorists - especially suicidal terrorists with a bomb - shooting it down would have been a military judgement call. Covering it up after the fact would be a national security judgement call. Although there's no is clear evidence that Flight 93 over PA went down as a result of heroic action be passengers, we now know that the order had been given to fire upon it if it did not retreat from its vector toward Washington.
To: Chapita, doug from upland, Itsalmosttolate, Tymesup, cva66snipe
bump
56
posted on
09/20/2001 9:36:13 AM PDT
by
smorgle
To: Harrison Bergeron
Covering it up after the fact would be a national security judgement call. That is an amazing statement. The same kind of national security that failed to detect critical weaknesses in airline security?
If TWA800 was a terrorist incident, the reason for the cover-up was probably to prevent the same kind of economic tremors that the more recent bombings have caused. By avoiding confronting the truth, however, the damage has only been magnified.
Lies have this funny way of boomeranging. Too bad more of our brilliant bureacrats and politicians don't understand that.
To: Judge Parker, aristeides, harpseal, rdavis84, timestax, Plummz, thinden
bump
58
posted on
09/20/2001 9:40:40 AM PDT
by
smorgle
To: NoControllingLegalAuthority, Freedom'sWorthIt, Inspector Harry Callahan, dennisw, Nita Newpress
bump
59
posted on
09/20/2001 9:43:23 AM PDT
by
smorgle
To: independentmind
Didn't Rush Limbaugh dismiss the theory that 800 was a terrorist hit, or brought down by a bomb, because Kallstrom was his friend, he trusted Kallstrom, and Kallstrom assured us it wasn't a bomb or a missile? Is it time to pressure Rush to show some credibility and ask some questions?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson