Kruschev proclaimed that they (the socialists) would defeat us from within, not externally with military power. He also said he’d have a “man in the white house” before the end of the millennium. I think it’s all too obvious that they’ve accomplished the latter and that they will accomplish the former, because Bill Clinton was just an outward indicator that we’d come to accept socialism internally. In essence, I guess that means we’ve already lost. Nobody out here knows much of anything and what they do know, they think is all there is TO know. That couldn't be further from the truth.
Can you learn new things if you believe you already know everything? I think not. I believe you have to continuously do research – hard research into everything. That includes economics, politics, government, religion, military history, world history, you name it. The thing is, you have to do your own research and “put it together” yourself. That’s the hallmark of a critical thinker. Add to that the fact you have to have access to all the facts – names, datetimes, places and events. It helps if they’re already coordinated, already compiled but again, the analysis must be done just on the facts, not on someone’s assessment of how the facts fit together. If there are documents like contracts, pacts, agreements or whatnot, that certainly indicates intent, but again, this is more in the realm of fact than opinion.
I don’t know how many times I’ve seen it out here and on other forums where people talk about the socialists or the “commies” being so influential in this nation. Then, they just can’t seem to take the next step and realize that in the long-term plans of the Soviet Union, they’d intended to put one of their agents in the white house, just to raise the "flag" of their brand of moral victory. Well, if Bill Clinton isn’t one of their agents, why did he protest against the United States during the Viet Nam war when he went to Oxford? Why did he marry a card-carrying Marxist? Why all the money to Russia via the IMF without the checks and balances to make sure that it went into building a free market system? Why all the secret technology to China?
I believe it’s established that he is that “man in the white house”. That being the case, wouldn’t he still be working for their cause? Don’t you think he’d adopt Soviet tactics and use terrorist causes to further the Marxist agenda as they’ve done for decades now? Do y’all know what a “dupe” is? Or a “useful idiot”? Wouldn't he use a time-tested and proven tactic of getting his enemies to fight each other? Where is your critical thinking?