Skip to comments.
DEVELOPING ON DRUDGE: MYSTERY OBJECT CAUGHT ON TAPE MOMENTS AFTER SECOND TOWER HIT
http://www.drudgereport.com/ ^
Posted on 09/16/2001 4:45:57 PM PDT by SamAdams76
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-233 next last
Comment #41 Removed by Moderator
To: The Real Deal
I also heard this - ONCE.
One thing for sure: this is no mystery, a portion of the plane went through the building and arced downward at great speed. It could have easily landed a couple blocks away.
The straight line inked in on the Drudge photo is bogus and misleading.
To: SamAdams76
Those are interesting photos. Thanks for the thread.
43
posted on
09/16/2001 5:25:48 PM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
To: jackbill
I SAW ONE OF THE ENGINES ON THE GROUND ON TUESDAY
To: surfer
I just copied the photo and stored as a .bmp, blew it up 400%. I estimate that this object is 50% the width of the WTC, possibly 200 ft long?
To: SamAdams76
C'mon now, give 'ol Matt a break. I think he's just trying to suggest that magician David Blaine may have had something to do with it, what with the tricky camera angles and all.
To: Las Vegas Dave
It probably is some sort of optical illusion caused by the sunlight and the camera man probably running or maybe it is just a weather balloon (wink)
47
posted on
09/16/2001 5:27:52 PM PDT
by
surfer
To: SamAdams76
line looks completely misleading to me
To: SamAdams76
Landing gear.
To: surfer
Okay...so there's a trajectory superimposed on the first tower, when the second tower has clearly just been hit. What's your point, Matt?
BTW, this crappy image isn't from the right tape, but during the second collision you could plainly see a second plane in the background. Not insinuating anything mind you...there's no shortage of air traffic in this area.
To: John Valentine
It is coming from the building that has no flames.
51
posted on
09/16/2001 5:29:43 PM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
To: Aeronaut
Sorry, I'm not a pilot so I don't know the lingo. What I meant to say was that I believe he was probably maximizing the thrust of the engines. This would put a moment on them due to the accelerating turbine rotor so that they would turn out as I thought I saw them do prior to impact. The attitude adjustment with the "stick" may indeed be as you say.
52
posted on
09/16/2001 5:29:55 PM PDT
by
Rockitz
To: SamAdams76
Seatbelt on for tonite's show.
I'm not certain I understand, but what's the red thing?
To: admiralsn
Speaking of pics on Drudge, how 'bout that pic of our great leader President Bush? I am more inspired every time I see him.
To: SamAdams76
Drudge did himself in. May he RIP with Gary Bauer, Lucianne Goldberg, John McCain, William Kristol and the brat boy, Lucianne Junior, also known as Jonah Goldberg.
To: SamAdams76
It's Michael Rivero's aluminum beanie.
56
posted on
09/16/2001 5:31:28 PM PDT
by
aculeus
To: SamAdams76
Matt wanting attention. I think thats what it is ;)
To: SamAdams76
I saw it too...today when I was watching the foxnews replay the second tower hit....
...right after the HIT...the camera picked up, what looked like, another jet flying in the distance...between the two towers.
When I saw the other plane on the TV...I thought maybe it was a fighter jet that just didn't get there in time. Or a passenger jet...
I am sure it was another plane/jet...it was not just something falling to the ground.
Comment #59 Removed by Moderator
To: budman_2001
whatever it is it cant be from the plane because the red projectile is comming from an angle above the second tower. Perhaps it is some type of missile.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-233 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson