Posted on 09/15/2001 10:31:50 AM PDT by ServesURight
The United States of America is a Christian nation again.
The Terrorist attacks have renewed America's faith in God. There will be no more ACLU/People for the American Way lawyers screaming about politicians and government officials openly praying anymore.
There will no more lawsuits against city officials and residents who display religious symbols during Christmas. No more outrage against high-school teams praying before games, no more Supreme Court decisions.
The atheists at the ACLU were probably defecating in their pants at the site of Congress and President attending the National Cathedral, and at the site of millions of Americans holding candlelight vigils and prayer groups across the country.
I dare the Left to make "seperation of church and state" an issue now.
Legal education appears to be follwing the same trend as public schools.
You are partially correct. However, just so you will know, the legal education as it relates to the first amendment usually espouses the view that you have. I have debunked that. You don't respond with any substance, so I guess you cry uncle. (BTW, don't be misled by the screen name: that was in 1998).
In both instances I go with 'they mean what they say'.
1) "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion".....
(ie Federal Goverment "Hands Off", although I will agree that they are trampling the ...."or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;" side of the coin )
2) ..."the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed"
Peace be with you....
But it doesn't mean "hands off." What it meant in the late 18th Century was that the Federal Govt. should not and could not create laws that endangered religious establishments that were already in existence in states. Mass. had one such establishment until 1832. Other states had them, while others didn't. Federal court decisions started in the 1870s have used their own political views and those of Thomas Jefferson (who had as much to do with the creation of the first amendment as you and I had, and even said so) to justify a strict irreligious view of the religion clauses. Such views do not comport with the framers' views.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.