1 posted on
09/14/2001 6:30:05 AM PDT by
backhoe
To: backhoe
These "backpack" nukes are very heavy and larger than you think. If I remember correctly, they are more like mines. And the mechanisms have to be maintained on a regular schedule.
2 posted on
09/14/2001 6:34:16 AM PDT by
AppyPappy
To: backhoe
they could've taken a hi-jacked plane and rammed it into a nuclear plant
11 posted on
09/14/2001 7:14:23 AM PDT by
arielb
To: backhoe
"A suitcase nuke attached to a drum of anthrax or botulism would be a hellish terror weapon,..."
The heat from the detonation would destroy the bio agent.
12 posted on
09/15/2001 3:07:51 PM PDT by
JimRed
To: backhoe
Any ex-soviet tactical nuclear artillery shell could be converted into a "backpack nuke".
Stripped down to the physics package, they could be as small as 8"D x 30"long and weigh under 50#.
To: backhoe
Well, I'll tell you one thing. These can be transported from one end of the U.S. to the other by car, Grey Hound Bus or even Amtrak. There's virtually no security, though I know for a fact people wrote to Tom Ridge about Grey Hound and Amtrak's lack of security. For victory & freedom!!!
To: all
To: AmerRepb
The "Davey Crockett" ( W-54 ) Tactical Nuclear Warhead
The W-54 probably represents a near minimum size for a spherical implosion device (the U.S. has conducted tests of a 25.4 cm implosion system however). The W-54 is certainly light enough by itself to be used in a "suit case bomb" but the closest equivalent to such a device that U.S. has ever deployed was a man-carried version called the Mk-54 SADM (Small Atomic Demolition Munition). This used a version of the W-54, but the whole package was much larger and heavier. It was a cylinder 40 cm by 60 cm, and weighed 68 kg (the actual warhead portion weighed only 27 kg). Although the Mk-54 SADM has itself been called a "suitcase bomb" it is more like a "steamer trunk" bomb, especially considering its weight
20 posted on 4/24/02 1:07 AM Eastern by krogers58
[
32 posted on
04/24/2002 1:40:10 AM PDT by
backhoe
To: backhoe
I tend to discount all these "back pack" nuke stories, 'cause if Osama had them, he's have used them on us bu now...
35 posted on
01/28/2006 1:59:45 AM PST by
Bender2
(Read the first three chapters of my Science Fiction novel)
To: All
Suitcase Nukes Said Unlikely To Exist--U.S. backpack nukes:
http://www.active-duty.com/BackPackNukes.htm
Others include:
Mk-54 SADM- Atomic Demolition Munition (ADM) weight 54 lbs (bomb only) 16 in. X24 in. Yield: Variable, 10 T - 1 Kt.
Artillery Shell 8in.x44 in. wieght:200 lbs. Yield: Variable - 100 T to 1.1 Kt (Mod 0), 0.8 Kt (Mod 1)
It takes serious design work to make them small, but it can be done.
This one weighed at under 100 pounds. Sub-kiloton yield. It's name was the Davy Crockett.
36 posted on
11/13/2007 5:46:49 AM PST by
backhoe
(-30-)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson