[LSJohn]

Or maybe the few articles I get around to reading are the sort of thing that attracts their attention, as well.

There's a certain logic to that!

It's hard to read more than a few responses on most of the threads. . . . . . . depressing.

[arcane]

It's hard to read more than a few responses on most of the threads. . .

The thread entitled, The Surrender Option..., has some reasonable discussion.

[roughrider]

I lost one of my best replies on an Arator thread, documenting how a lot of this disaster can be laid at the feet of Clinton, the media, and the people who voted for him for the "good economy." A few people must have hit the abuse button and all the good posts get lost with the "bad." With all that Clinton did to help Arafat vs. Israel, and Bin Laden's boys in the Balkans, and his policies continuing, I can't see our foreign policy as a reason for this, except in regards to Iraq. Nothing about this makes sense at all, but we can all count on the terrorist cells continuing to be tolerated (what other word is there?) by the government, even though their claimed reasons for that tolerance now have 10,000 reasons why it is a failure.