Thats it.
think they learned a lesson from the truck bomb which created a large crater but didn't bring it down.Ha ha!
You conveniently OVERLOOK those beams/columns DESTROYED by that bomb blast!
BTW, the author of this 'piece' overlooks the effects of heat (the fire) and it's effects on the materials involved (steel and concrete) ...
Interesting that you should say this. After the OKC bombing, there was a special group formed which examined this exact subject.
I tend to agree somewhat. First attempt in '93 failed. Somebody went back and did their homework, and this time were successful.
I am still a bit unclear as to exactly where the first plane struck tower #1. Dead center, (side to side, that is, not top to bottom), or approximately centered between the core and one side, as the second plane seemed to. Second plane appears to have gone in one side and sheared its way through to the point of almost (or perhaps succeeding in) coming out the other. Conflagration ensues, weakening the structure over time to the point of collapse of that floor. All floors above come down, floors below cannot accomodate this sudden weight crashing down from above, and they all pancake down to the ground.
One tower collapsing, perhaps luck plays a role in bringing the whole thing down. Two towers collapsing, damn good luck, or, as I am more inclined to believe, somebody had to have a darn good idea how to make it happen.
And when I refer to luck above, I am strictly referring to the luck running with the maniacal cowards, to accomplish their objective, not to be construed that I was hoping this would happen.
I think so. I think that there may have been bombs set as well.
The coordination of the attacks and the sophistication, like having structural engineers involved in planning underscores the seriousness of this.
I don't think President Bush or any politician has yet enunciated this, or perhaps do not fully grasp it.