Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans Want Sen. Smith to Step Aside
newsmax.com ^ | 9/6/01 | Carl Limbacher and....

Posted on 09/07/2001 8:05:00 AM PDT by sayfer bullets

Thursday, Sept. 6, 2001

Republicans Want Sen. Smith to Step Aside

The GOP is urging Sen. Bob Smith of New Hampshire not to seek re-election, and Rep. John Sununu will announce his intention to seek Smith's seat in late October, Fox News reported today.

Smith is considered the most vulnerable senator, and Republicans are worried, especially with the looming retirements of Sens. Phil Gramm of Texas, Jesse Helms of North Carolina and Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, and the possible departure of Tennessee's popular Fred Thompson.

Polls show that the New Hampshire Democrats' probable senatorial nominee, Gov. Jeanne Shaheen, would trounce Smith but could lose to Sununu.

Sununu's announcement had been expected last month, but he delayed it so Republican leaders could try to get Smith to bow out, Fox reported.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-196 next last
To: Twodees
Sununu is a conservative? Thanks for the chuckle of the day so far.

You don't accept the ratings of the ACU?

Tell us then, omnipotent one, how you rate a Senator?

Smith came within two percentage points of losing in 1996. He's a goner, even if he runs.

21 posted on 09/07/2001 9:07:01 AM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sayfer bullets
Is it because he tried to bolt out of a concern...

Tried?
Tried?
Tried?
TRIED?
If you don't call what Smith did bolting the party you're probably dumb enough to have voted for Clinton.

22 posted on 09/07/2001 9:10:32 AM PDT by curmudgeonII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
It's so easy for some here to throw their tired and cynical cliches around, isn't it? The less-than-single-digit-types waste valuable time in which we can be advancing a winning AND principled agenda. They can rot while sitting around holding out for a candidate with which they agree 100% of the time.
23 posted on 09/07/2001 9:16:50 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Get a clue
Winning and having principles are not mutually exclusive.
24 posted on 09/07/2001 9:19:04 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: wattsmag2
Even though he is a fine Conservative, Smith screwed himself last election cycle. He will now pay the price.

Yes, you are right. He pitched a fit on the Senate floor, burned bridges. then came back with his hat in his hand. These people like Smith and Buchanan who can't get the nomination of a party, leave for another party. People don't forget that and hate tantrums. And that's what it was.

I still can't get over all these people who think they are qualified to be be president and then have a tantrum when they don't get elected. John McPain comes to mind although he didn't leave the party. He just votes like he did.

25 posted on 09/07/2001 9:25:41 AM PDT by Texas Mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
"Winning and having principles are not mutually exclusive."
They are for Republicans.
26 posted on 09/07/2001 9:33:07 AM PDT by Scarlet Pimpernel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
"If you don't win, you can't get anything done, except to sit in the corner with the other losers. Some "conservatives" would rather lose on "principle" than try to create a governing coalition. "

To each his own. But I do remember Goldwater who lost an election but not his principles. He set the stage for a conservative future and Reagan. Which is now being 'coalitioned' away.

If you stand for something you will never really win by compromising. You win by moving the pile in your direction and not moving the pile in the opposite direction through 'governing coalitions' - that is an automatic loss

27 posted on 09/07/2001 9:33:38 AM PDT by ex-snook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: curmudgeonII
You anti-Smith people haven't answered the question;

WHO in the U.S. Senate fought for the second amendment the most?????????? never mind, I'll answer for you!

SENATOR BOB SMITH

But go ahead, we really don't need that 2nd. A. anyway. Protection against government tyranny is only a fantasy. Ruby Ridge, Waco, Klamath Falls, Jarbrige, Darby, etc;etc, they really didn't happen, right?

28 posted on 09/07/2001 9:40:44 AM PDT by Ol'foggie (noUN@USA.evr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Smith will run again and he will be your globalist lackey butt-boy Sununu!
29 posted on 09/07/2001 9:43:27 AM PDT by t-shirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Winning and having principles are not mutually exclusive. 24 Posted on 09/07/2001 09:19:04 PDT by anniegetyourgun

True!!! Smith has won with principles everytime!

And smith is the Strongest defender of Life and Liberty in the US Senate!

I pray the Citizens of New Hampshires will remember their state motto when it's time to choose between Patriot Senator Smith and this globalist lackey boy Susnunu:

LIVE FREE OR DIE!

Infact Live Free or Die Should be Smith's campaign slogan against this bum Sununu!

30 posted on 09/07/2001 9:47:54 AM PDT by t-shirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Ol'foggie
Smith is also the biggest fighter of the IRS in the US Senate!
31 posted on 09/07/2001 9:49:41 AM PDT by t-shirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: t-shirt
Which is why he's back in the fold. Remember T, all parties have principles and to suggest otherwise is silly. You just happen to participate with one that isn't going anywhere.
32 posted on 09/07/2001 9:53:34 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
He set the stage for a conservative future and Reagan. Which is now being 'coalitioned' away. If you stand for something you will never really win by compromising. You win by moving the pile in your direction and not moving the pile in the opposite direction through 'governing coalitions' - that is an automatic loss

BS. Reagan "compromised" with conservative Democrats and moderate Republicans to build a governing coalition -- his agenda was: 1) tax cuts; 2) defeat the commies; and 3) cut back government. He got the first two, but not the last one; his attitude was "win the fights you can win -- all else in good time."

Nobody admires Barry Goldwater more than I do, but his loss of the 1964 election set back the cause of conservatism 16 years. A lot of Republicans tend to forget that in the afterglow of Reaganism.

33 posted on 09/07/2001 9:53:51 AM PDT by Cincinatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: wattsmag2
If he screwed up, it was in asking to come back. But you're probably correct.
34 posted on 09/07/2001 10:09:36 AM PDT by sayfer bullets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: t-shirt
Smith will run again and he will be your globalist lackey butt-boy Sununu!

I'll bet he doesnt' run.

The handwriting is on the wall: NH Republicans won't back him against Sununu.

Jean Shaheen would clean his clock in the general election.

Smith's opposed to drilling in ANWR, or offshore, anywhere. That makes no sense.

35 posted on 09/07/2001 10:10:46 AM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: CPT Clay
How the hell is what he did a "Jeffords act"?

Does it matter that his was a conservative rift, rather than a socialist/democrat rift?

36 posted on 09/07/2001 10:11:08 AM PDT by sayfer bullets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: curmudgeonII
Your emotions can get the best of you. Quit wordsmithing and pay attention to the article. So what if I should have typed "almost" or "left and came back".

If it makes you feel REEEEAAAL important to insult fellow freepers by suggesting 1)they're stupid, and 2)(more importantly) that they may have voted for Clinton then just fine.

I thought this place was for conservatives, not for Party SHEEP. Incidentally, I've always been a republican and always voted so.

In the immortal words of Algore: "...I won't respond in kind". Have a great weekend.

37 posted on 09/07/2001 10:16:49 AM PDT by sayfer bullets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Do you realize or even give a damn that Smith has singlehandedly stopped numerous gun control bills and amendments in the US Senate?

Do you realize that Smith single handedly has fought Big Brother intiatives like "know your customer"?

Do you know Smith has singlehandedly stopped bill after bill that tried liberalized government funding for abortion and do you care?

Bob Smith is a Patriot like the founding fathers compared to must of the other men in either house of Congress.

And you would just throw him away because your masters(RNC Goons)says so?

You would throw a good Patriot away for a globalist, Henry Kissinger type like Sununu?

38 posted on 09/07/2001 10:22:18 AM PDT by t-shirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
He will run if I and the good people of New Hampshire have anything to say about it!
39 posted on 09/07/2001 10:23:55 AM PDT by t-shirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Does the Second Amendment mean anything to you?
40 posted on 09/07/2001 10:26:03 AM PDT by t-shirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-196 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson