[kjam22]

She shouldn't sell the story because she should have some resemblence of shame. Because fundamentally I believe that people shouldn't make a profit out of an adulterous relationship. But the question is why wouldn't she sell it? She obviously has no belief that what she did was wrong in any way.

[kattracks]

Her morals weren't the only morals concerned. She did have a partmer in all of this, who just happens to be a lawmaker. Her story would shine the spotlight on his lack of morals too, which IMO is not a bad thing.

[SheLion]

? She obviously has no belief that what she did was wrong in any way.

kjam, are you a Condit "lap dog?"