So I found the actual article. Turns out you’re a very deceptive and clever editor. You complete edited out the first part of that sentence that only credits Homer with 55 to 60% of the story. And of course the dozen paragraphs BEFORE that talking about how the story spent centuries getting down the pipeline to Homer changing constantly, and being changed and modernized by Homer while he finally wrote it down.
So he’s on the “Homer as final editor and contributor” path. Which is one of the many paths in the Homer Question and part of why it’s so fun.
And you cannot be trusted.
Now really, buh bye.
“Now really, buh bye.”
So you come winging in with crap and then forbid me to say anything.
Deceptive and clever editor??
My point to you in that post was in your claim that Homer never existed, or had a hand in the writings, in accordance to all your claimed experts.
Who is being deceptive?