Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kids online safety package clears House, drawing warnings from digital rights and tech groups
nbc ^ | 06 29 2026 | Angela Yang

Posted on 06/30/2026 6:52:55 AM PDT by yesthatjallen

The House passed a bipartisan package of children’s online safety bills in a 267-117 vote Monday, advancing legislation that supporters say would better protect children online but critics warn could threaten privacy and free expression.

The bipartisan Kids Internet and Digital Safety (KIDS) Act, championed by its sponsors as a way to protect children online and hold major technology companies accountable, would require new safety features and parental controls on online platforms, restrict the use of minors’ data for targeted advertising, require age verification for pornography websites and establish new rules governing AI chatbots and online games.

“This is a major step toward a safer online world for kids, making safety the default, giving parents more tools to protect their children and teens, and holding Big Tech accountable,” the House Energy and Commerce Committee wrote in a social media post announcing its win.

SNIP

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: kidsact

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


1 posted on 06/30/2026 6:52:55 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
require age verification for pornography

This is usually a govt Trojan horse to curtail online anonymity.

2 posted on 06/30/2026 6:55:10 AM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3

Agreed.


3 posted on 06/30/2026 6:55:51 AM PDT by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Headline is funny......big tech wrote this abortion of a Bill to begin with. It’s all B.S. as this is another obstacle for VPN usage, nothing more.


4 posted on 06/30/2026 7:03:08 AM PDT by mythenjoseph (Islam is not compatible within a free society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Their garbage will make it easier for the perverts to find and pray on children


5 posted on 06/30/2026 7:15:17 AM PDT by butlerweave (Fateh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

It will create a database of children


6 posted on 06/30/2026 7:16:11 AM PDT by butlerweave (Fateh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Since the 90s, “it’s for the children” has been government codewords for “were about to do something to you you’d never agree with unless we gaslit you about it first”


7 posted on 06/30/2026 7:17:40 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie ("We want no Gestapo or Secret Police. F. B. I. is tending in that direction." - Harry S Truman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Anytime you see “It is for the Children” you don’t need to look any further to know it is a Leftist proposal.

All moral people can agree that pornography is an immoral and bad thing. And Leftists are the most immoral bad people in this nation, so it begs the question:

Why are they seeking to implement this legislation?

After all, immorality, open sexuality, homosexuality, transsexuality, and pornography are all things that run counter to the family unit and religion, so...if they believe all these things, which is undeniable (except by them, of course) why would they be trying to curtail them?

The truth is, they aren’t trying to curtail them. They are trying to curtail something else.


8 posted on 06/30/2026 7:17:58 AM PDT by rlmorel (Factio Communistica Sinensis Delenda Est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

Yes. See my post above. You get it, FRiend...for certain.


9 posted on 06/30/2026 7:18:42 AM PDT by rlmorel (Factio Communistica Sinensis Delenda Est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Also politicians have no clue about the internet and how it works ,LOL


10 posted on 06/30/2026 7:19:50 AM PDT by butlerweave (Fateh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

Nancy Pelosi’s “it’s for the children” daycare made the Scamalis RICH ,LOL


11 posted on 06/30/2026 7:21:31 AM PDT by butlerweave (Fateh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Kids will find a work around the second it hits the Internet - just as they do at schools to get around school filters.

Either that or a willing adult will log on for them - just as they sign for them to get tattoos when they’re minors - saw it at the school where I taught all the time. Ditto for alcohol.


12 posted on 06/30/2026 7:24:00 AM PDT by Bon of Babble (You Say You Want a Revolution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

Unfortunately.


13 posted on 06/30/2026 7:25:20 AM PDT by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Why would the govt be trying to curtail things that run
counter to the family unit, and that lefty bugaboo, religion?


As we have come to expect.......when they say it’s
“for the children,” they have their own hidden agenda.


14 posted on 06/30/2026 7:35:44 AM PDT by Liz (“The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies the work of His hands." (Psalm 19:1))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Everyone of us will have to prove we are not children.
I believe this is for most everything, not just porn and social media..
It’s a way of total government monitoring of your internet usage.


15 posted on 06/30/2026 7:38:48 AM PDT by Doctor Congo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

At least they won’t be preying on them. ;)


16 posted on 06/30/2026 7:43:44 AM PDT by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Congo

Everyone of us will have to prove we are not children.
= = =

I frequently have to prove I am a human.

My dog, however, has learned how to click the mouse and he can still order on-line dog treats.


17 posted on 06/30/2026 8:27:24 AM PDT by Scrambler Bob ( My pronoun is EXIT. Generally full of /S -- Living with Havana Syndrome -infected from Main Stream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3

I can’t understand why they can’t move all pornography to a specific location so kids and adults don’t accidentally see it when doing searches.


18 posted on 06/30/2026 8:56:31 AM PDT by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3

I doubt it will actually work to keep children safe from pornography. Since a great deal of pornographic material is on school library shelves.

You are I believe correct in its true purpose.


19 posted on 06/30/2026 9:29:41 AM PDT by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Make a law that states any website that displays any pornographic material at all must have an .XXX extension. Then filter locally.


20 posted on 06/30/2026 12:37:59 PM PDT by jroehl (And how we burned in the camps later - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn - The Gulag Archipelago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson