Posted on 06/11/2026 5:57:32 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
British Defense Minister John Healey resigned on Thursday amid a dispute over military spending, accusing Prime Minister Keir Starmer of failing to commit the government resources needed to defend the country at a time of heightened threat.
The unexpected resignation, accompanied by a scathing public letter, compounds the pressure on Starmer when he is facing a likely leadership challenge and exposes the crisis at the heart of government - how it can ramp up defense spending when there is no money to spare.
Britain's defense and finance ministries have been locked in talks for months over how to meet rising demands to increase military spending, delaying the publication of Britain's Defense Investment Plan, which was expected last year.
Military leaders have stressed that the plan is needed to meet the rising threat level at a time of frequent Russian incursions into British waters, but the government is already struggling to reduce debt while the overall tax burden is at its highest level in decades.
The high-profile resignation comes as Starmer struggles to hold onto power, after Wes Streeting resigned as health minister in May and as another challenger, Andy Burnham, attempts to return to frontline politics to launch a leadership bid.
(Excerpt) Read more at jpost.com ...
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Free Stuff for all Starman’s savages cost a lot
Russia is not a threat to the UK. Even if Putin regards the UK as a threat to Russia, he sits and laughs as he watches the UK destroy itself.
Russia isn’t the military threat. Argentina is. If Trump so much as hints approval, the Malvinas are gone. Argentina will likely remove the inhabitants, who despise the Argentines.
The social threat of the Muslim population probably can’t be solved at this point. The white Brits are in the position of the white South Africans. Perhaps Trump will take in refugees from white Brittain.
They're Socialists. So the answer is no because they'll vote Democrat which will turn this whole country into California.
We'll take Tommy Robinson. But nobody else.
No. They would not be refugees they voted for this crap. Refugees typically are from a totalitarian state where they have no rights nor protection. The Brits chose this path.
True......the US was neutral during the first Falklands War,,,,, but the ‘special relationship’ was strong then.
no dough to get even a single submarine ocean-ready nor any other blue-sea boat out-of-dock except for a single destroyer, HMS Dragon ... how pathetic that the country that built a navy that ruled the seven seas 200 years ago now has only a SINGLE blue-sea boat ... that’s what a tsunami of invading ignorant antithetical peasants plus 80 years of socialism does to a country ...
Defence Secretary wants Union Jack on every Barrow submarine
...Defence Secretary John Healey says he wants a “bloody Union Jack” on top of every missile submarine made in Barrow...
“Russia is not a threat to the UK. Even if Putin regards the UK as a threat to Russia, he sits and laughs as he watches the UK destroy itself.”
I don’t know how many times Putin and (and other Russian leaders) has told Europe to close their damn borders (definitely a lot), but European leaders know better...
I suspect that Russia would be a lot happier with a bunch of self-immolating Whites in Europe, than a radicalized and very dangerous caliphate.
“True......the US was neutral during the first Falklands War”
Just as we’re ‘neutral’ during the Ukraine War. We were helping the UK quite a bit during the Falklands, obviously.
We’re giving Ukraine a lot of help, under the table.
Just as we were giving the Brits a lot of help, even before Lend-Lease.
We do not need to spend more money on bombs and bullets.
We need to spend more on housing, schools and our NHS instead.
A roof over your head. Enough food to feed your children. A public health service you can rely on in your time of need.
That is what real security means.— Jeremy Corbyn (@jeremycorbyn) June 11, 2026
VERY SLOW FUNERAL OCCURRING FOR THE UK.
The UK defence secretary has resigned, hitting out at @Keir_Starmer as an utter failure who won't put a penny towards defending the United Kingdom.
Well over £2bn a year goes on housing invaders in hotels.
£15bn on welfare for them. pic.twitter.com/srWxy8C2It— Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 (@TRobinsonNewEra) June 11, 2026
Healey wanted to spend 5,000 pounds per year on defense but Starmer wants to spend only 1,000 pounds per year?
Why woud a communist as a PM wants to increase money for defense when he already close to his objective to destroy this imperialist capitalist country?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.