Posted on 06/04/2026 9:07:01 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Nobody believes that Karen Bass is indifferent to whether she faces Nithya Raman or Spencer Pratt as her opponent in November.
Raman is a weak candidate, and every Democrat wants Spencer Pratt out of the race for obvious reasons, not the least of which is that anybody but a leftist on the ballot is an atrocity in their eyes. When Raman collapsed after the sole mayoral debate, Raman's polling and chances of victory, which were considered good, nosedived into single-digit territory.
On election night, nobody was shocked that Pratt had closed the gap with Bass, just as nobody was surprised that Raman came in a distant third, as the polls suggested.
But California doesn't have election nights. They have counting weeks, where vote totals change as batches of votes trickle in, and those batches show an amazing pattern: there are almost no votes for Spencer Pratt, which is nearly impossible statistically.
There is literally nothing California could do to make their elections less secure.
Mail in ballots and No ID.
Weeks of counting with no real chain of custody.
The fraud is staggering.
It’s an insult to America.
It’s an insult to Americans.— C3 (@C_3C_3) June 4, 2026
No matter how much you believe that Democrats are somewhat more likely to vote by mail than Republicans, the difference is not THAT much, especially since Republicans have become much more likely to vote by mail.
Yes— The Yootopian (@TheYootopian) June 4, 2026
California sends out ballots to all registered voters, and of course doesn't clean its voter rolls because that is Jim Crow 2.0. You can register to vote online without any proof of citizenship or residency, and without a Social Security number. You can just check a box that you have neither a DL nor a Social Security number, which is practically impossible.
p>Even babies get Tax IDs now. But not voters, apparently. Just request a ballot, and poof, you have one mailed to you, even if your address is a mailbox business.Los Angeles county celebrates the fact that it takes nearly a month to count votes for the primary.
It’s not a bug.
It’s feature for democrats https://t.co/foUasy14OQ— Kevin Dalton (@TheKevinDalton) June 3, 2026
Red flag… 🚩🚩🚩
39.3% vote in…
Karen Bass had 117,579
Spencer Pratt had 86,323
42.4% vote in…
Karen Bass 130,429
Spencer Pratt 86,323
Virtually every candidate received votes except for Spencer Pratt. Impossible.
https://t.co/pUkm64MG37 pic.twitter.com/RwK3cppdCf— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) June 3, 2026
Homeless shelters have hundreds of voters listed as residents, most of whom haven't been there in years. They pile up and get harvested by...nobody knows who.
I caught them cheating and now they’re desperately trying to explain it.
Community notes on this post:
“It is possible for one candidate to receive no additional votes in a specific batch.”
This is Mathematically impossible when it comes to a batch of tens of thousands of of votes. Every single candidate (Dem and Rep) recorded votes except for Spencer Pratt.
https://t.co/flIF5eZQme pic.twitter.com/0bRbEFHTk6— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) June 3, 2026
Democrats have told us that it takes weeks to count ballots because their elections are so secure, which is interesting, because every developed country in the world counts their ballots in hours, not weeks.
As long as they’re counting ballots after Election Day in California, it only means one thing: Spencer Pratt and Steve Hilton are out of the runoffs for LA Mayor and Governor.
In fact, Gavin Newsom confirmed it just two weeks ago.
When asked about the possibility of ending up with two Republican candidates for governor and no Democrats, he said:We will have to topple the state government of California, and that is exactly what the Democrats are going to do.
“We all have agencies. We can shape the future. I don’t anticipate this being the case, but there is a ‘break the glass scenario.’ There are many people who have a deep understanding of what it would look like if Democrats were locked out, and we’re going to do everything to make sure that doesn’t happen. I’ll leave it there.”
pic.twitter.com/ywJNwUPeln— 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸 (@Real_RobN) June 4, 2026
As long as they’re counting ballots after Election Day in California, it only means one thing: Spencer Pratt and Steve Hilton are out of the runoffs for LA Mayor and Governor.
In fact, Gavin Newsom confirmed it just two weeks ago.
When asked about the possibility of ending up with two Republican candidates for governor and no Democrats, he said:
We will have to topple the state government of California, and that is exactly what the Democrats are going to do.
“We all have agencies. We can shape the future. I don’t anticipate this being the case, but there is a ‘break the glass scenario.’ There are many people who have a deep understanding of what it would look like if Democrats were locked out, and we’re going to do everything to make sure that doesn’t happen. I’ll leave it there.”
It's not just Republicans who think that the vote is being rigged. Bettors on the prediction markets swung heavily against Spencer Pratt AFTER he came in second, as anticipated, but they watched the hinky ballot drops. They now predict he will be booted off the ballot, despite his still being substantially ahead of Raman in the vote count.
Wait.
Pratt's 40K+ votes AHEAD of Raman are a 'slim lead' while Bass only leads Pratt by 20K?
Explain that to me like I was five... https://t.co/uxOT0BPzXS— tree hugging sister 🎃 (@WelbornBeege) June 3, 2026
On the day of the election, the prediction was that Pratt had an approximately 25% chance of winning the election, and Raman single digits, reflecting the bet that he would be on the ballot in November. The numbers are reversed now.
Pratt's chances fell like a rock. After the vote counting showed him up big over Raman. Everybody knows why. It was those vote dumps, and the realization that all those harvested ballots will pour in for Bass and Raman. Especially Raman.
Pratt is still ahead of Raman, but most people now think the fix is in. The "break glass" scenario that Newsom talked about is coming to pass.
If Democrats cared a whit about how any of this looks, they would work to reassure voters that the process is fair. They know that it looks corrupt, and that a perception of corruption undermines legitimacy in the eyes of the losers. That's why even Ecuador uses hand-counted paper ballots in front of representatives from all the parties. Because confidence in elections is almost as important as fairness in elections.
Countries that operate under democratic principles work hard to ensure transparency in election procedures. When Americans monitor foreign elections, they are only certified fair when everything is transparent.
There is nothing transparent about California elections. Democrats just don't care, because as Newsom put it:
“We all have agencies. We can shape the future. I don’t anticipate this being the case, but there is a ‘break the glass scenario.’ There are many people who have a deep understanding of what it would look like if Democrats were locked out, and we’re going to do everything to make sure that doesn’t happen. I’ll leave it there.”
Sounds like Maduro, doesn't it?
Don't worry, though. Every Pravda outlet will spend countless hours explaining how the election really WAS fair, even though it looks hinky.
Trust us, they will say. We are sharp as a tack.
“months of counting with ballots being flown in by helicopter”
The Postal Service photographs the face of each envelope.
“As your mail zips through the postal network, it passes through these super-fast sorting machines. These machines snap a grayscale photo of the front of each piece of mail. It’s like getting a little preview of what’s to come. And for some items, like catalogs or magazines, you might even get a color image”
https://www.under30ceo.com/informed-delivery/
It would appear so. 🙄
It should be obvious when they keep counting ballots until they get the results they want. Even third world countries have an Election Day and do not keep accepting ballots after that day. The only election that could be more fraudulent would be the sham elections we see in communist dictatorships where there is but a single candidate on the ballot who then gets 99%+ of the votes.
Yes, we need Zorro. Or Batman.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
