Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How China supercharged ‘birth tourism’ and scammed American citizenship for up to 1.5 million babies
NY Post ^ | 01/29/2026 | Peter Schweizer

Posted on 01/29/2026 6:33:33 AM PST by DFG

“Birth tourism” — where pregnant women have their child on America soil to become citizens — has been happening for decades. But Chinese elites have “weaponized” the practice, says author Peter Schweizer, raising a generation of legal citizens who have no loyalty to the US. In this excerpt from his new book, “The Invisible Coup: How American Elites and Foreign Powers Use Immigration as a Weapon,” he explains how.

As we sang “Auld Lang Syne” in the early morning of Jan. 1, 2025, the first American newborn of the year arrived to much fanfare and celebration.

But this time, the baby was the progeny of Chinese citizens, and the mother had intentionally traveled to give birth on American soil, so that the child would automatically be granted US citizenship, a practice known as birth tourism. When such children turn 21, they can also apply for resident status for both of their parents.

This baby was born in the US territory of Saipan in the Pacific. More than 70% of the newborns in Saipan are Chinese birth tourist parents who utilize the territory’s 45-day visa-free visitation rules and the “Covenant of the Northern Mariana Islands” to guarantee that their children will have American citizenship.

That little child’s parents are two of many who are taking advantage of America’s birthright citizenship policies, based on an interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. How many is anyone’s guess.

Since the US government does not directly track birth tourism, we must rely on estimates. In 2012, one nonprofit calculated that about 36,000 foreign-born women gave birth in the United States and then left the country.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: China
KEYWORDS: birthtourism; china; immigranttruth; immigrationtruth; schweizer; surrogate

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


1 posted on 01/29/2026 6:33:33 AM PST by DFG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DFG

because what the U.S. needs is 1.5 million more chinamen.


2 posted on 01/29/2026 6:35:42 AM PST by MarlonRando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarlonRando

If the USA is going to fight a major war against China, they can send draft notices to all those ‘American citizens’ and train them as cannon fodder for the war. If they don’t show up for the draft, denaturalize them. After all, as ‘American citizens’, they owe allegiance to the USA.


3 posted on 01/29/2026 6:55:02 AM PST by 17th Miss Regt (Fascist, deplorable, and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DFG

Birth tourism citizenship was not the intent of the 14th Amendment, and the NY Post article points to the dangers of this scam interpretation.


4 posted on 01/29/2026 6:56:18 AM PST by Socon-Econ (adi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

This birthright citizenship issue must be decided by SCOTUS “toot sweet” - and will (hopefully) put an end to this abomination - that other countries have abandoned:

Ireland ended unconditional birthright citizenship in 2005

France reformed its laws in 1993, limiting automatic citizenship to children born to at least one parent who was also born in France or who is a citizen.

New Zealand abolished unconditional birthright citizenship in 2006

Australia ended unrestricted birthright citizenship in 2007, tying citizenship to parental status.

India restricted birthright citizenship in 2004

The Dominican Republic removed unconditional birthright citizenship in 2013, retroactively denationalizing many individuals of Haitian descent.

Problem is: Will SCOTUS do the right thing? I don’t trust Coney-Barrett, Kavanaugh or Roberts.


5 posted on 01/29/2026 7:05:11 AM PST by Bon of Babble (You Say You Want a Revolution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

Problem is: Will SCOTUS do the right thing? I don’t trust Coney-Barrett, Kavanaugh or Roberts.


Agree. Ending birthright citizenship would end their beltway cocktail party invites. Probably not happening, unforutantely.


6 posted on 01/29/2026 7:10:00 AM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

It would be nice if you guys would not refer to the American military and our soldiers and Marines as being “cannon fodder”.


7 posted on 01/29/2026 7:37:53 AM PST by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DFG

This baby was born in the US territory of Saipan in the Pacific. More than 70% of the newborns in Saipan are Chinese birth tourist parents who utilize the territory’s 45-day visa-free visitation rules and the “Covenant of the Northern Mariana Islands” to guarantee that their children will have American citizenship.

Time to cancel the agreement. This is the 21st Century.


8 posted on 01/29/2026 7:48:57 AM PST by kaktuskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

Simple fix; deport the sneaky bastards.


9 posted on 01/29/2026 10:30:23 AM PST by chopperk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

Just denaturalize them directly.


10 posted on 01/29/2026 10:38:15 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MarlonRando
because what the U.S. needs is 1.5 million more chinamen.

But but it was reported that Chinese children have an overall higher IQ than everyone else on the planet. Their government said so therefore it must be true.

The anti-Somalians.

11 posted on 01/29/2026 10:41:40 AM PST by MikelTackNailer (be American or Be Gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson