Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Queen was a Remainer: her secret views on Brexit revealed
The Times (UK) ^ | August 29 2025 | Valentine Low

Posted on 08/30/2025 3:39:31 AM PDT by Salman

Queen Elizabeth II had opinions on all sorts of subjects; it was just that she chose not to share them. Or, more accurately, she did sometimes share them, but those who heard were usually too discreet to repeat them. As George Osborne says, “I was constantly astonished by how candid she was and that none of this ever came out. She’d be very forthright in telling you what she thought of individuals, including members of her own family, and what she thought about things going on in the country.”

Another politician tells how the Queen once mentioned over drinks that she was due to see Pakistan’s General Musharraf, who would later be found guilty of violating the country’s constitution and sentenced to death in absentia. “Isn’t he just a crook?” she said. “Isn’t he just completely corrupt?” The group she was talking to were lost for words at this, so one of them turned the conversation to horse racing and asked whether she watched the Channel 4 preview programme The Morning Line. She said,“I really like the Channel 4 coverage in the afternoon, and I always like to watch it when my horses are running, but The Morning Line? I can’t watch it. I can’t stand that man John McCririck.”

...

(Excerpt) Read more at thetimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: brexit; europe; neverheldajob; queenelizabeth; remainer; shesdeadnow; unitedkingdom; valentinelow; worstukmonarchever
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last
To: discostu
The Saudi royal family IS in charge. Who do you think funds the wahhabists. Royalty = evil. Always.

They knocked it off after we invaded Iraq.

Iran used to be ruled by a Shah. He was pro-Western and he tried to be modern. Then they decided to overthrow him. Now Iran is a theocracy. They were better off under the Shah.

61 posted on 08/31/2025 6:52:15 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

No they didn’t. They might have sent it through a more circuitous hard to trace route. But don’t believe for a second they stopped.

The Shah was an evil POS who tortured and executed people constantly. He deserved to be overthrown. The problem there is it’s the mideast. Only bad guys compete in the middle east so only bad guys win. So one blood thirsty dictator overthrew another. But the Shah was still evil.


62 posted on 08/31/2025 7:01:33 AM PDT by discostu (like a dog being shown a card trick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

No she didn’t, she was an awful queen. Britain’s decline was under her and not once did she say or do anything. She acted like a celebrity, caring only about being liked by the media, and took no action toward her duties to her nation and her people.


63 posted on 09/01/2025 1:53:11 AM PDT by Truthsearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Salman

Look at John McCririck. I understand why the queen did not like him....
Weird looking to say the least https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/john-mccriricks-haunting-prediction-death-22212604


64 posted on 09/01/2025 8:25:45 PM PDT by minnesota_bound (Making money now. Still want much more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson