Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Passengers left stranded for 17 hours after flight diverted due to unbelievably selfish act: ‘Everybody was fed up’
NY Post ^ | July 11, 2025 | Ben Cost

Posted on 07/20/2025 5:22:39 AM PDT by xxqqzz

Passengers were stranded in a “war zone” at a Maine airport for over 17 hours after their flight was diverted due to a pair of butt-huffing bozos puffing cigarettes on board.

Passengers were stranded in Bangor, Maine, for over 17 hours after their TUI Airways flight from Cancun, Mexico, to London, UK, was diverted due to a couple smoking on board.

“It was like a war zone in a lounge — rows and rows of beds,” passenger Terry Lawrance said while painting the dismal scene in Bangor, Maine (pictured).

“Everybody was fed up,” UK native Terry Lawrance, 66, told Southwest News Service of the unplanned layover, which occurred July 8 on a TUI Airways flight from Cancun, Mexico, to London, UK.

The aircraft had been flying for about an hour when the pilot came on the intercom and announced that two passengers had been “smoking in the toilet” and that he’d have to make an unscheduled landing if they persisted, Lawrance recalled.

“About three hours later, around the border with Canada and he came on to let us know that the plane was being diverted to Bangor, Maine,” recounted Lawrance.

Tracking data on Flightradar24 depicts the plane turning back toward Maine, right after entering Canadian airspace.

The passengers continued smoking despite a warning from the pilot.

They landed around 9:30 p.m. that evening, after which the two smokers were escorted off the plane. “They were obviously drunk, and he basically assaulted his partner,” recalled Lawrance.

The pilot said they’d be on their way after some paperwork was done, not knowing that their short pitstop would turn into the layover from hell.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Mexico; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: airport; flying; maine; smoking; travel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-122 next last
To: DIRTYSECRET

Just have them roll down the window! Geez!!


61 posted on 07/20/2025 7:33:34 AM PDT by Racketeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RainMan

Smoking was restricted to a part of the plane (usually back), and the air circ system kept it so those in the non-smoking section really were not bothered by it.
********
Yeah, yeah, that’s what smokers always think. I, as a former smoker, can now tell you, as a non-smoker, the smoke smells awful in a restaurant, car, anywhere and definitely would be bothersome in a plane.

Smokers are oblivious, selfish and stupidly addicted. I sure was.


62 posted on 07/20/2025 7:34:06 AM PDT by yldstrk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

“.... and a four pack of cigarettes for an after meal smoke.”

Yep and now they give us phones wireless phones that we can hold next to our head for long periods of time if we want.


63 posted on 07/20/2025 7:36:24 AM PDT by Racketeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: xxqqzz
They landed around 9:30 p.m. that evening, after which the two smokers were escorted off the plane. “They were obviously drunk, and he basically assaulted his partner,” recalled Lawrance.

Were they two homosexuals having problems following the same rules everyone else must follow?
64 posted on 07/20/2025 7:39:17 AM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Smoking caused fires that caused the plane to crash or killed the passengers from the fumes?
Nonsense.
It was banned because busy-body Karens complained. The airlines knuckled under from pressure from the usual pack of pinko problem-purveyors.
Airline seats used to have ashtrays in the armrests.


Modern planes are full of plastics and PVCs to reduce weight. If they burn, the fumes are highly toxic. No smoking is just common sense.
65 posted on 07/20/2025 7:42:42 AM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Semper Vigilantis

Airports have very few outdoor patios that allow smoking so chain smokers get drunk instead.


66 posted on 07/20/2025 7:49:48 AM PDT by cnsmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: C210N

Langoliers?


67 posted on 07/20/2025 8:02:03 AM PDT by Tom Tetroxide (Psalm 146:3 "Do not trust in princes, in the Son of Man, who has no salvation.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Semper Vigilantis

It was easier to find hull leaks, though.


68 posted on 07/20/2025 8:02:11 AM PDT by ebshumidors ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: RainMan

I assure you that if anyone anywhere on a plane lit up, it would offend my nose.

Chew some nicotine gum and leave my air alone.


69 posted on 07/20/2025 8:08:15 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Angelino97’s 100% anti-Semitic lie: “Settlers tend to be ultra-Orthodox Jews, armed with Uzis.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xxqqzz

Could they have confiscated the cigarettes after the first incident?


70 posted on 07/20/2025 8:08:27 AM PDT by Southside_Chicago_Republican (God save the United States!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Not smoke. Simple.


71 posted on 07/20/2025 8:08:45 AM PDT by MagaMatt (Sapere aude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

One of my former co-workers couldn’t get on a plane without a couple of drinks in her.


72 posted on 07/20/2025 8:09:53 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: xxqqzz

73 posted on 07/20/2025 8:10:18 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RainMan

The problem with smoking is it is not just an individual act on a plane. No air system could filter out the stink and smoke. I flew lots too when smoking was allowed. One cigarette was enough to fill the cabin. It stinks, it soaks in to clothing skin and hair, and is irritating to the eyes and lungs of people who don’t smoke. Smokers had the opinion it didn’t bother anyone but they can’t tell because they are use to it. I am glad those days are gone.


74 posted on 07/20/2025 8:13:42 AM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nonliberal

No reason to cause a delay even for a good cause; knocking them out so they appear to be sleeping should suffice.


75 posted on 07/20/2025 8:25:16 AM PDT by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
Smokers are oblivious, selfish and stupidly addicted. I sure was.

And as you can see reading thru this thread, VERY defensive and in complete denial about the smell.

76 posted on 07/20/2025 8:29:03 AM PDT by Chuckster (Friends don't let friends eat FARMED FISH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4US

The flight was diverted because the two persons refused a direct order from the pilot. I’s just that this time the banned behavior happened to be smoking. Had they put out the cigarettes the plane would have continued its flight.


77 posted on 07/20/2025 8:30:34 AM PDT by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

I am very glad smoking was banned on planes. Some of us like breathing air that does not stink of cigarettes of any kind.


78 posted on 07/20/2025 8:32:01 AM PDT by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4US

Don’t know for sure if we have all of the details. I’d think some law enforcement officers could meet them when they landed.


79 posted on 07/20/2025 8:34:18 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Valid point on air quality on planes—one of one hundred reasons I hate flying and have not gone near an airport since I retired.


80 posted on 07/20/2025 8:40:18 AM PDT by cgbg (It was not us. It was them--all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson