Skip to comments.
Two-thirds of the DOJ unit defending Trump policies in court have quit
Reuters ^
| July 14, 20258:29 AM CDT
| Andrew Goudsward
Posted on 07/14/2025 12:05:11 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Good chance to stick it a future Dim administration.
21
posted on
07/14/2025 12:25:26 PM PDT
by
VanShuyten
("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable anima)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Critics have accused the Trump administration of flouting the law in its aggressive use of executive power.
However they had no problem with Bidens open border sleeper cell operation comrades.
22
posted on
07/14/2025 12:27:54 PM PDT
by
Vaduz
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Someone queue George Peppard saying “I love it when a plan comes together.”
To: Regulator
“Thank God and Greyhound they’re gone.”
As an added bonus, if they quit voluntarily there is no severance pay. Plus federal pension costs will be less than if they stayed for a full career.
24
posted on
07/14/2025 12:30:17 PM PDT
by
Soul of the South
(The past is gone and cannot be changed. Tomorrow can be a better day if we work on it.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
And probably they quit knowing the democrats will destroy them when Trump is out of office. Look what they did to all bos lawyers last time.
25
posted on
07/14/2025 12:34:32 PM PDT
by
Organic Panic
(Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
That’s what Bondi has to put up with. DOJ may have to contract-hire its pro-Trump legal help. It’s gonna take time.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Excellent.
Flush ‘em out and replace with reliable allies.
27
posted on
07/14/2025 12:38:33 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(Nitzy, now with 88% plausibly anti-Semitic posts!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
They very likely were told that defending Trump’s policies meant a loss of their ABA standing.
28
posted on
07/14/2025 12:39:45 PM PDT
by
lastchance
(Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Well good, we don’t need Left loonies in the DOJ, now there’s vacancies for more patriots to work there.
Change the culture change the nation.
Keep up the good fight, President Trump.
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
7 for perfection
29
posted on
07/14/2025 12:40:39 PM PDT
by
jacknhoo
(Luke 12:51; Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
So?
Replace them with conservatives!
30
posted on
07/14/2025 12:40:51 PM PDT
by
airborne
(Thank you Rush for helping me find FreeRepublic! )
To: Regulator
Now they can hire some real attorneys, not just Rat Party undercover operatives. Where are you going to get them? Even the LSAT is biased to screen for socialist preferences.
31
posted on
07/14/2025 12:41:07 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
Everyone who leaves,
everyone that Trump did not appoint, was someone who could have been weaponized against TrumpII and JDV.
Now the new hires are examined to see if marxism is their sworn enemy, and I mean MARXISM IS THE SWORN ENEMY.
To: Regulator
“Now they can hire some real attorneys, not just Rat Party undercover operatives.” ... who deliberately try to lose Trump policy lawsuits ...
33
posted on
07/14/2025 12:45:34 PM PDT
by
catnipman
((A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil))
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Quitting for not doing your job is usually known as getting your butt fired. Those cowardly, “Dipstick judges” are the ones who should be embarrassed and quit. The Trump quitters didn’t quit. They got fired.
34
posted on
07/14/2025 12:47:20 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(If you have asylum in the U.S. and you go home to visit family, is it like violating a Protect Order)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I’ll put that in the Blondi is doing a heckuva job column.
Anyone in DOJ prior to January that leaves is a huge positive.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Idiots working for Reuters quit. People working for the DOJ are making too much money to just quit.
36
posted on
07/14/2025 12:50:59 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(If you have asylum in the U.S. and you go home to visit family, is it like violating a Protect Order)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Good! They will no longer be sucking from the public’s nipple.
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
38
posted on
07/14/2025 12:55:20 PM PDT
by
thinden
(Buckle Up!)
To: MinorityRepublican
If they were going to quit, why did they throw tantrums and go complain to “Dipstick Judges” from Jamaica, Haiti and India who should be selling 44 ouncers at 7-11 and Circular K.
39
posted on
07/14/2025 12:56:24 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(If you have asylum in the U.S. and you go home to visit family, is it like violating a Protect Order)
To: Jim W N
Sounds like Team Trump is getting rid of the rats - that’s a good thing.
So Reuters tries to spin it as rats abandoning a sinking ship.
40
posted on
07/14/2025 1:05:30 PM PDT
by
enumerated
(81 million votes my ass)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson