Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Live Updates: Supreme Court Limits Use of Nationwide Injunctions (excellent)
NY Times ^ | 6/27/26 | Abbie Van Sickle

Posted on 06/27/2025 7:18:05 AM PDT by CaptainK

The justices found federal judges had exceeded their power by issuing temporary pauses on President Trump’s order ending birthright citizenship. But they made no ruling on the constitutionality of the order itself.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: demagogicparty; hahahaha; judgewatch; lawfare; maga; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

1 posted on 06/27/2025 7:18:05 AM PDT by CaptainK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

So Trump can just go ahead and enforce it until/unless it is successfully challenged, without a national injunction, in court?


2 posted on 06/27/2025 7:20:03 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

Roberts finally got it right, but as minimally right as was possible.

I did not have a battle royal over birthright citizenship on my 2025 bingo card, but I’m here for it.


3 posted on 06/27/2025 7:21:36 AM PDT by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You can never do more. You should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

I think local judges are limited to the jurisdiction.


4 posted on 06/27/2025 7:22:11 AM PDT by CaptainK ("No matter how cynical you get, it is impossible to keep up” )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

Right. But why wait 30 days for Trump’s order if they’re not hoping Roberts’s good buddy Norm Eisen can brainstorm something else by then?


5 posted on 06/27/2025 7:24:39 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: absalom01

Whenever Roberts rules on the correct side he will always minimize it as much as he possibly can. He always leaves the door open for the other side to drive a tank though it.


6 posted on 06/27/2025 7:25:11 AM PDT by iamgalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

There was talk the skittish SCOTUS was going to pack their vacation bags and rush out of town without this major decision——the most important issue between us and civil war. Surprised they worked up the courage to rule today.

Allowing illegals to be here with long delays and legal firms slowing their cases would simply mean the citizens would fight physically against the local illegals who are killing, robbing, carjacking and raping them and taking millions of dollars in housing and medical care.

Local judges would bring that civil war.

We needed a national ruling victory.


7 posted on 06/27/2025 7:26:16 AM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

Justice Barret included a complete section, approved by six Justices, that destroyed the view of Jackson in dissent. The section took great umbrage with the “imperial” status of the judiciary. Barrett and the other five joining, does not agree with that imperialism. It si silly for a judge to order the executive to follow the law when the judge is not following the law which limits their powers.

This is from a quick, rapid read. Maybe more later.

Gwjack


8 posted on 06/27/2025 7:26:25 AM PDT by gwjack (May God give America His richest blessings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK
Correct. The NATIONWIDE injunctions are no longer NATIONWIDE. This is a big win for Team Trump. NATIONWIDE injunctions?: IGNORE !!!!
9 posted on 06/27/2025 7:26:44 AM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

Doesn’t this mean that they’ve exceeded their power for all of their activist orders?


10 posted on 06/27/2025 7:26:47 AM PDT by JudyinCanada (Praying that America's Golden Age includes Canada.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

Either Federal laws apply to EVERY State equally or they don’t. Which is it, Roberts? Or do we have to repeat the first half of the 1860’s?


11 posted on 06/27/2025 7:27:02 AM PDT by TTFlyer (Lenin: that by the infliction of terror, a well-organized minority can conquer a nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

Limited to the plaintiffs of the case. Nothing about BRC.


12 posted on 06/27/2025 7:27:47 AM PDT by ScottHammett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

“The Government’s applications to partially stay the preliminary injunctions are granted,” Barrett wrote, “but only to the extent that the injunctions are broader than necessary to provide complete relief to each plaintiff with standing to sue.”

That sounds like a loophole large enough to drive a Sherman tank through. The lower court judges will simply rule that a particular nationwide injunction “is necessary to provide complete relief to each plaintiff with standing to sue.”


13 posted on 06/27/2025 7:28:16 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

also see

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2025/06/27/breaking-scotus-rules-on-birthright-citizenship-n2659527?

BREAKING: SCOTUS Rules on Rogue Judges, Impacting Birthright Citizenship


14 posted on 06/27/2025 7:30:06 AM PDT by bitt (<IMG SRC=' 'WIDTH=30%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gwjack

Here is the opinion.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a884_8n59.pdf


15 posted on 06/27/2025 7:31:54 AM PDT by gwjack (May God give America His richest blessings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

Federal anD state judges just ignore the sc now it appears


16 posted on 06/27/2025 7:32:25 AM PDT by Bob434 (Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

Darn, I thought it said “Injections” ... Still have PTSD from when the clot shot was mandated at work (I left the company)


17 posted on 06/27/2025 7:33:03 AM PDT by um1990 (Under attack from within. We must fight on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

THEY FINALLY DID IT!

SUPREME COURT DEALS HARD BLOW TO RESISTANCE 2.0 BY HOLDING NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONS ARE IMPROPER INFRINGEMENT BY COURTS ON POWERS OF THE EXECUTIVE. HUGE W FOR TRUMP!!


18 posted on 06/27/2025 7:33:41 AM PDT by Lazamataz (I'm so on fire that I feel the need to stop, drop, and roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Yep every time we “win” one they always leave a gaping hole for the left to exploit and nullify the so called win


19 posted on 06/27/2025 7:33:42 AM PDT by iamgalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

Kagan the hypocrite joined the dissent. She had previously spoken against the power of district court judges to impose universal injunctions. Of course, that was when Biden was president. Now, somehow this is different.

Or she’s just a political hypocrite.


20 posted on 06/27/2025 7:35:47 AM PDT by henkster (The attacks on Tesla are all the proof you need that climate change was never about climate change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson