The House has passed a bill to deport illegal aliens who get caught drunk driving.

X ^ | Jun 26, 2025 | Libs of TikTok

[Bob Wills is still the king]

“Well, why not simply deport them for being illegal aliens?
The House needs to be passing a bill to outlaw national injunctions from DISTRICT judges.”
____________________________________________________________

Many here just love national injunctions by district court judges when they negate things like gun control laws (remember “Saint Benitez”?).

[Steely Tom]

All this is going to do is cause certain states to stop enforcing DWI laws against anyone not obviously a legal American citizen.

[PeterPrinciple]

There’s no shortcut around procedural due process.

---

the assumption you have there is that only the courts provide procedural due process.

[MV=PY]

Last I looked, Biden was exporting more when he left office.

So much noise in the news cycle!

[jpp113]

Criminal constitutional procedural due process does not apply to deportations. If you think so, you have been duped by the left who are trying to normalize their false statements. The due process that they are entitled to is codified in the US Code Title 8.

[Bob434]

[[The House has passed a bill to deport illegal aliens who get caught drunk driving.]]

HUH????? How about they pass a law to ARREST ILLEGALS regardless of whatever else they do here?

[unread]

"you don’t need a bill to deport illegal aliens. they’re here illegally. deport them. yesterday."

BRAVO.! Well said...

[Bob Wills is still the king]

Constitutional due process applies to every legal action. That’s “procedural due process,” the exact kind Justice Thomas supports. “Substantive due process” is what most people here gripe about.

The basic foundation of all law since the Magna Carta has and continues to be the right to be informed of the charges against and provided with an opportunity to meaningfully respond to those charges.

Our Constitution treats everyone within the United States, except foreign military and ambassadors, with the same legal rights; even for something as mundane as a traffic infraction.

[Mark]

The bill by libs would be if an illegal drives drunk AND injures any liberal politician and/or family, then deport them.

[Organic Panic]

A majority of the times there is a dui accident it is a Latino sounding last name.

[Does so]

“our auto insurance rates go up when many uninsured illegals are in accidents.”
.
+
.
“Last I looked, Biden was exporting more when he left office”.
+

Many Illegals STAGE auto injuries.

Biden had open borders, so most have returned...

[nikos1121]

Haha

[Wuli]

Is not being here illegally here enough, drunk driving or not. What’s next. a bunch of individual laws that say an illegal can be deported if they also do (a), and another says if they do (b), and another (c), and another (d)...............(x), (y) (z). If the law says they can be deported if they are here illegally, period, then nothing else is needed.

[jpp113]

Which they receive during their deportation hearing process. That’s all they are due: a hearing in immigration court, and chance for an appeal to the Appellate Immigration Court. Constitutionally, Congress has jurisdiction over Immigration per Article I and the above procedural due process is codified in 8 USC, passed by Congress and signed by a President. This process is ADMINISTRATIVE, not criminal. In any of these BS TRO’s on this issue, have you ever seen a Fed District Court Judge cite to the Immigration Act? Nope. Why? They do not want you to see how they are subverting the Supreme Law of the Land.

[wizardoz]

This bill will probably end up languishing in the same No Man’s Land as the No Rogue Rulings Act that passed on April 9th, went to the Senate, and was never heard from again. HR 1526.

It's hard to get excited about this sort of thing anymore.