Posted on 06/23/2025 9:19:16 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
San Francisco is the worst-run city in the nation, according to a report by WalletHub.
Several other California cities also ranked in the bottom 10 of 148 cities, including Stockton (138), Los Angeles (139), Long Beach (140), Fresno (141), and Oakland (146).
The finance website created a “Quality of Services” score of 36 metrics split into six categories, which was then measured against 148 of the nation’s most populated city’s per-capita budget.
San Francisco came in last overall, ranking 89th in financial stability, 137th in education, 102nd in safety, and 135th in economy.
The WalletHub study also looked at the operating efficiency of cities, by comparing the quality of city services residents receive against the city’s budget.
“The best-run cities in America use their budgets most effectively to provide high-quality financial security, education, health, safety and transportation to their residents,” WalletHub analyst Chip Lupo said in the June 17 report.
“Many of the top cities also have a very low amount of outstanding government debt per capita, which can prevent financial troubles in the future.”
San Francisco ranked so low in part due to its long-term debt holdings. Moody’s lowered San Francisco’s credit rating in 2024, citing in part, the high number of commercial vacancies in its downtown, Moody’s said in a statement to Bloomberg News.
It ranked highest in long-term debt outstanding per capita, coming in at 146th, with debt levels 89 times higher than the best city: Casper, Wyoming.
In the report, San Francisco ranked 135th in economy, suggesting that San Francisco’s high per-capita budget isn’t resulting in effective service quality. The city had $2.2 billion in outstanding city general obligation bonds as of June 30, 2024.
The WalletHub study ranked San Francisco last in high school graduation rate at 90.4 percent. By contrast Frederick, Maryland, ranked number one, graduating students in 2024 at a rate of 94.3 percent, a 1 percent increase over the year prior.
Although San Francisco’s roads have improved in recent years, there is still room for improvement. San Francisco’s 2,148.3 total lane miles ranked tied for 126th in quality of roads.
In 2024, San Francisco’s independently rated Pavement Condition Index (PCI) score increased to 75, a rating categorized as “good” by the regional Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC). This rating placed San Francisco as having the best roads among large Bay Area cities.
The pavement in the Bay Area, encompassing 44,000 lane miles of local streets and roads, does not receive great ratings overall. The MTC placed the region’s 2023 PCI score at 67 out of a maximum possible 100 points, and is therefore deemed “fair.”
“The good news is that city and county public works teams have been able to prevent large-scale deterioration. We’re even seeing big improvements in some places. The bad news is there’s still so far to go,” MTC chair and Napa County Supervisor Alfredo Pedroza said of the Bay Area’s roads in 2024.
San Francisco scored much higher in two measures: It was second in health, potentially owing to the fact that the city has the lowest infant mortality rate. And it ranked 13th for infrastructure and pollution risk.
The top cities on WalletHub’s list are Provo, Utah; Nampa, Idaho; Manchester, New Hampshire; Boise, Idaho; and Nashua, New Hampshire.
WalletHub, which creates tools and resources to help consumers manage their finances, acknowledges that cities across the country have been ravaged by high inflation.
According to the Joint Economic Committee (JEC) State Inflation Tracker, the average California household was paying $1,278 more per month for the identical basket of goods and services in December 2024 compared to January 2021. Cumulatively, that amounted to $38,353 in higher spending per household over that time period.
The California weighted average of the consumer price index (CPI) in 1965, came in at 31.7 (using 1982-4 as the reference line at 100); by 2024, it had risen to 341.951.
This has locked local leaders into a delicate balancing act, especially as of late, as they must factor in the significant increase in the cost of goods when deciding where to place budget funds. In San Diego, the city has been weighing cuts in services such as public restrooms, and has already increased the price of parking downtown.
“Leaders must carefully consider which services are most essential, which agencies’ budgets to cut or boost, and whether and how much to raise taxes, among other decisions,” the WalletHub report states.
It comes in 1st for naked butts pooping without toilet paper on streets.
If only the residents of SF could bring themselves to elect Democrats, then it would turn into a utopia.
Today after NYC elects the Communist as Mayor, they are sure win the race to the bottom, all those government owned grocery stores will be look like a bunch of wild dogs fighting over a meal
Did they consider Seattle?
NYC: “Hold ma beer!”
Oakland says, thems fightin words
Or Chicongo?!
Oakland makes SF look downright civilized.
People pooping on the streets in broad daylight could be a telltale sign of poor city management. Ya’ think?
I think with the fire fiasco LA should take the top spot from San Fran Crappo.
Gee, What a Surprise!
If not too many people are becoming pregnant, not too many infants are dying.
The LGBTQWERTY, the Transnational Transvestites from Transylvania, the "regular" democRATS who cannot answer the question: What Is A Woman. They all combine to low infant.... everything.
I used to love spending the day I SF. That was back in the 60s and 70s. You couldn’t pay me enough to go there now.
Gavin Newscum STARTED the Destruction of this once GORGEOUS city.....who is the mayor now??
Born and raised in SF, now living south on the SF Peninsula. I now avoid going into SF, except for medical reasons or visiting with relatives. Best parts ruined over the last 50 years, and now there are some new best parts but with problems like overcrowding and lack of parking, parking that comes with expensive fees if found.
The thing is that SF residents do much of their shopping south on the Peninsula outside the city limits. They don’t like shopping in their own stores, even big box places like Ikea, Costco, etc. - they would rather hit the same brand stores outside the city. All due to the rampant problems like drug addicts, vagrants, and thieves that the city’s Democrat leaders refuse to handle. Insanity.
Reminds me of the story about a new 100 unit apartment being built in the Soviet Union. One toilet was broken in shipment and because of the Greatest Form of Government there was no method to replace the broken toilet. Seems the Greatest Form of Government never thought that something could get broken. So 99 usable apartments were built.
19,000 employees take home more than $150,000 per year.
In contrast, San Jose, a city of about the same population, has only 7,000 employees
Anyone with common sense can tell you how the Government run grocery stores will work out, they will be drab and unattractive, they will have fewer choices, they will have lower quality products, the employees won’t care about customer service, and they will get looted continually.
Go into any whole foods and you will see a bright, colorful store full of higher quality organic products with employees that for the most part provide quality customer service, it’s the same way for most large grocery chains.
Go into a Dollar General and you will find a darker, more crowded store with few choices, staffed with people who mostly are just stocking shelves.
Granted the two stores are going after different customer groups, government run grocery stores will make the Dollar General stores look like gold plated palaces with empty shelves, because everything has been looted or stolen by the employees.
How surprising...I thought San Fran was the best city to live in....😀
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.