War-Pig Lindsey Graham Itching for Another Endless War with Iran — Tells Trump to Go “All‑In” and Join with Israel

Gateway Pundit ^ | Jun. 17, 2025 | by Jim Hoft

[Kazan]

War-Pig Lindsey Graham is itching for another endless war.

Appearing on Fox News Monday night, Graham called for direct U.S. military involvement alongside Israel and floated the idea of an outright regime change in Tehran.

Apparently, diplomacy is just a speed bump for Graham on the highway to regime change. In his own words, Graham praised President Trump, saying the time has come for America to go “all in” to “help Israel eliminate the nuclear threat.” Translation? More bombs, more blood, more American involvement.

But Graham didn’t stop at just military strikes. He’s now openly calling for regime change in Iran.

War-Pig Lindsey Graham: I take President at his word. He gave Iran 60 days to do a deal on the 61st day. We are where we are. There’s two ways to stop Iran from having a nuclear weapon. One is diplomacy, the other is force. I think the headline tonight is we’re moving into the land of force. I think Iran has allowed themselves to be fooled in the thinking they could manipulate Trump. Same old tactics with the wrong guy when it comes to Trump.

To all those who voted for President Trump and got him in office, God bless you. He’s the right guy at the right time. These are dangerous times.

Why do we say no nuclear weapon for Iran? They’re a religious theocracy. They’re built around the extreme version of Islam. They want to destroy Saudi Arabia and the Suni branch of Islam. They want to kill all the Jews in Israel and come after us. That’s what their whole country is built upon, a theocratic view that There’s nobody else in the world but them when it comes to worshiping God. If they had a nuclear weapon, they would use it. Israel believes that. I believe that.

Here’s the task at hand. Be all in, President Trump, in helping Israel eliminate the nuclear threat. If we need to provide bombs to Israel, provide bombs. If we need to fly planes with Israel, do joint operations.

But here’s the bigger question. Wouldn’t the world be better off if the Ayatollahs went away and were replaced by something better? Wouldn’t Iran be better off? Tom Cotton is coming on. He made a great observation. The endless war is Iran. Since 1979, they’ve been attacking the entire region, chanting death to America, death to Israel, since their very founding.

It’s time to close the chapter on the Iranian Ayatollah and his henchmen. Let’s close that chapter soon and start a new chapter in the Middle East, one of tolerance, hope, and peace."

##

Warmonger Lindsey Graham just rushed to Fox to advocate for U.S. involvement as soon as he could.

He is also pushing for a US-backed regime change in Iran.

I would like to renominate Graham to get a one-way ticket to the frontlines of every war he wants America involved in. pic.twitter.com/CcQrx90sq1

— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) June 17, 2025

[Kazan]

If so, then Israel should be using them and we shouldn’t think about getting directly involved.

[Kazan]

The President has absolutely authority to take military action if there is a threat to the nation.

Iran is not a threat to us. They absolutely do not have long-range nuclear missile capability. Nor has Iran, so far, attacked us, our troops or any interests we have abroad.

That is another reason why Israel should be the one to take military action, not us.

[Its All Over Except ...]

Trump saying yes or no to the United States delivering those types of bunker busters spoken of in the second part instead of letting Israel themselves drop those listed in the first part could mean the difference between Repubs winning or losing in 2026 as Dems are increasingly galvanized, the right is fracturing because of things like Trump backpedaling on deportations for certain sectors like hotel and leisure, letting 280-500k Chinese students cone into the US, etc, and now this.

There are those who like Trump and Elon both but for some reason like Elon more and I imagine Trump has lost their vote. Trump went after Tucker with a slight dig about not being on TV which only hurts Repubs at the polls, and on and on it goes.

And all because “Iraq has WMD’S” oh wait, excuse me, now it’s all over “Iran has WMD’s.”

[Does so]

We could postpone action indefinitely until the Iranians catch up with our drone technology.

(to take out OUR leaders).

[adorno]

The President has absolutely authority to take military action if there is a threat to the nation. Iran is not a threat to us.

Iran is a threat. Russia is a threat. China is a threat. N.Korea is a threat. Anybody or any country that ever says "death to America" is a threat. If they could and had the chance to do it, they would destroy the U.S.

They absolutely do not have long-range nuclear missile capability. Nor has Iran, so far, attacked us, our troops or any interests we have abroad.

Missiles is the only gauge you use to determine a threat?

Iran has INDEED killed our soldiers, in Iraq and elsewhere. If not for Iran, there would be almost (or no) problems ni the middle-east, and no Palestinian issues. And the proxies Iran uses against us and our allies, are also a threat. If Iran was allowed to continue in their quest for fissible uranium, would they not be a threat?

Afghanistan and the Taliban and Al-Qaeda were not a threat to American before 9/11 happened. They didn't have missiles an uranium at their disposal either. So, in your way of thinking, they were never a threat to America.

That is another reason why Israel should be the one to take military action, not us.

Israel cannot go it alone. And you can bet your sweet bippy that the U.S. is fully involved in "Israel's battle" against Iran. No way, no how, would Israel be capable of doing what they've done without us. Most of what they have as weapons, came from us, including the fantastic fighter jets and anti-missile technology, and the bunker=buster bombs.

This business about it not being our war or our interests, is just bull or full-blown denial of the reality in the middle east and elsewhere. We don't have to wait for a nuclear missile to strike us before we classify Iran as our enemy.

You should be on Iranian TV talking your trash.

[Starboard]

“Better to quash the smaller conflicts ‘now’, than to have to spend a not more time and materiel and shed huge amounts of blood, in a much larger conflict which may turn out unmanageable.”

************

There is never a shortage of conflicts in this world. We have to wisely choose and pick the one’s you’re going to get involved/entangled in and that’s something that needs to be subject to scrutiny and debate, whenever possible, as they are grave and consequential matters of national importance.

[adorno]

There is never a shortage of conflicts in this world.

If you are or get involved in them, directly or indirectly, you can't pick and choose which ones are worth handling. They may all be dangerous, if not soon, later. so, better to deal with them while still manageable than when they get more dangerous and unmanageable and very costly.

[Starboard]

Better to have healthy debate on serious commitments rather than having self-serving policy makers who live in their own bubble do it for us. Most especially when American lives might be put on the line.

[del griffith]

I wonder how many against Lindsay’s position have now changed their tune.