Posted on 05/26/2025 5:37:16 PM PDT by FreeReign
“Just do it right, and understand that due process doesn’t have a singular meaning.”
I don’t know which is worse; the millions of illegals or the Judicial tyranny which is leading up to a constitutional crisis.
Any person who came here without permission, bypassed the legal process of coming to America, and broke the law. Therefore, they are not eligible for due process to deport them. Respect is a two-way street. If you disrespect the law to come here, you aren’t entitled to respect to ship your ass out.
People already ruled to be deportable have already had their “due” process.
Dershowitz was a maestro for Jeffrey Epstein’s sweetheart plea deal with the feds decades ago perhaps this is just as sweet of a charm.
Do you know why these people - for instance the convicted criminals who were stopped en route to South Sudan - are not being returned to their own countries?
That is common sense, so it won’t fly.
Worse, both Biden and Mayorkas ignore the “Take care” clause and their sworn oaths. They should be jailed for inviting and letting in 10 to 20 millions.
There’s always some rights. If you are a person there are rights. Over the years it meant going before an immigration judge which is not a real judge, it is not part of the Judiciary system. The immigration judges are executive branch, no advise and consent. The hearings are quick. Minimal appeals if any. Problem is Sleepy Joe let in millions. Trump knew the courts would give push back. If he listens to Dershowitz he will get SCOTUS on board and no more ridiculous District Judge injunctions
"Right" according to whom?
and understand that due process doesn’t have a singular meaning.”
Maybe the judges should understand that. A finding within ICE that the "person" in question is an illegal alien should be sufficient for deportation, particularly due to the numbers involved. The Preamble to the Constitution shows that this application of "due process" does not require an Article III Court. The courts have already decided that if said alien is within 25 yards of the border, they can be deported, just as a policeman is allowed to kill in self-defense without a judge and air conditioned courtroom. Similarly, that there are so many illegals within the country, the courts cannot handle the numbers to deliver a "speedy" trial.
Hence, to me, this looks like obstruction of justice on the part of the judge.
The only way to accomplish the Voter Mandate to expel illegal aliens is for President Trump to suspend Habeus Corpus and Declare a National Emergency for Illegal Alien Invasion, and order the Military to expel them.
Otherwise, endless lawfare will fight every effort to deport.
The deportee can be given 15 days to dispute the FACTS. Not the law.
hire 1000 immigration judges and have mass deportation hearings..10 or 20 cases a day per judge like traffic court....pro bono attorneys will get tired of working for nothing....
assign a judge to every single illegal raiding party and quickly give them due process right there on the spot before deporting them. Should take about 2 minutes each
The process that is due does not have to be that of a full criminal trial. But there needs to be some opportunity for the person to show that he is legally here, or that the government has the wrong Jose Garcia. If there has already been a criminal conviction, order of deportation, or failure to appear in court, there should not be much due process involved before deportation. (I don’t presume that liberal judges would agree with me, however.)
The question are you here lawfully does need to get asked. An opportunity to present proof thereof must be offered.
That can be done by questionaire.
I’m here in Tijuana. I saw three gringos today.
The Mexicans have been very nice with just one exception.
I have no substantial fear for my safety here.
Dental work is 40% to 60% of the US price.
Most things are more expensive in Mexico.
Most Mexican adults drive cars similar to those of the US.
If an illegal can’t drive in the USA, that’s strong motive to self-deport.
Asylum seekers need not be allowed to drive.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.