Did the dissenters mention that there are three branches of government
If Trump said he would NEVER get rid of the illegals, they would MAKE HIM SEND THEM ALL HOME!
No Venezuelans? Well, there still is Chinese, Africans, Jamaicans, Haitians, Cubans, Mexicans, Ecuadorans, Hondurans, Penguins and a crapload of other “ans”.
Fixed it.
Those who enter without due and correct process shall be exiled without same!
Biden ignored the Supreme Court. Trump should too !
The Court has lost any semblance of respect or legitimacy.
American Civil Liberties Union?!?
Venezuelans aren’t Americans.
The ACLU should STFU. They “have no standing”.
If Trump gets another SC pick he should just leave it vacant.
Seems there are no longer any sane judges to promote.
Obviously, we have COMPROMISED SCOTUS members who are ruling AGAINST the WILL of AMERICANS who pay their salaries and the PRESIDENT they elected. They would rather keep ILLEGAL alien CRIMINALS in the US????
Something definitely STINKS about this!
So if any of these Venezuelan assholes murder an American Citizen, can we hold these scotus fools as accessories to murder?
Just asking for a friend…
Can Trump send them to Gitmo?
This means that the “Supreme” Court has now taken plenary power from the President without any legal justification.
They have said he has no right to invoke the Alien Enemies Act, meaning he can invoke it only with their approval.
So who has the power?
There is nothing in the Constitution nor Marbury v. Madison that allows this. The Alien Enemies Act has never been deemed un-Constitutional by anyone in 227 years.
The Court itself has now acted Un-Constitutionally. Who reviews their action?
If they are criminals, they may prefer Venezuela over prison.
I thought the Alien Enemies Act was non-reviewable. Judicially that is. The SC shoulda tossed it on those grounds with a ruling of reprimand to lower courts.
I could be wrong about it. But I know I’ve read that several times when that Bassturdberg was making his stupid rulings.
What are the legal issues involved here?
I could not get past the pay wall.
Four Republican appointed justices voted against the administration. What was the legal reasoning?
Only Thomas and Alito dissented. We are so screwed.
The very deep behind of scenes of this goes all the way back to the US war against the Barbary pirates (1801-1815). The wooden ship US Navy had been sent to Africa, where it had divvied up the waters there with the (still mildly hostile) British Navy into different jurisdictions.
However, arrogant US federal judges insisted that any US ship capturing such pirates had to stop what it was doing, and bring them to the US to stand trial, wasting many months in transit.
But the US Navy was smarter than that. The British Navy was permitted to hold pirate trials aboard ship, and when convicted, to hang the pirates on their own pirate ship which was being slowly scuttled. So US ships’ captains would check their navigational charts and discover that the pirates *just happened* to be captured in British jurisdiction. So in a spirit of cooperation, they “had” to turn over the pirates to the British.
I would measure to guess that the US federal judges were not happy to learn of this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbary_corsairs
THAT is how the legal system as such falls afoul of its habitual legal approach to jurisdiction. This was predicted by many of the Founders, to which sufficient numbers took objection as to propose the original 13th Article of the Bill of Rights: Titles of Nobility and Honor (TONAH), the Constitutional ratification of which was then ignored.
Declare Marshal F’ing Law. Then Gitmo them. The Supreme Court. And every single Dem judge across the country.