Posted on 04/06/2025 10:16:36 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
British Hindu groups have condemned a leaked police report which allegedly states that "British Hindu extremists" are forming alliances with far-right groups in Europe "over their common hatred of Muslims", saying it is completely untrue, misleading and baseless.
The Mail on Sunday claimed to have got hold of a secret UK intel report which says Hindu groups have met with far-right activist Tommy Robinson to "promote anti-Muslim campaigns" and pockets of Hindutva supporters are aligning with the extreme right in Europe. The study claims that Norwegian far-right terrorist Anders Breivik was inspired by "Hindutva ideology", that Hindutva extremists are interfering in UK polls, and that Bollywood films such as "Emergency" "carry a Hindutva ideology", causing clashes between British Hindus and Sikhs.
(Excerpt) Read more at timesofindia.indiatimes.com ...
> far-right activist Tommy Robinson
He’s opposed to rape gangs and child groomers. Very far-right of him.
Britain is dead.
Sadly.
Western Europe is all but conquered by Islamic types, I guess, if the hatred of Hindus is ramping up.
Obviously false, their hatred is of Europeans and they share it with the other invaders.
Anyone who does not want their children “groomed” and gang-raped is “far-right” in the eyes of the British establishment.
That’s nonsense. Hindus have no hate of Europeans and it’s true that most are wary of muslims. Also true that many Hindus vote conservative in the UK, possible that there is an attraction towards the reform party or even Tommy Robinson when the state openly sides with muslims. The rest of the claims are rubbish.
British Hindus, foreigners, is as fkd up as ‘British’ foreigner Muslims.
It will all be damned.
-fJRoberts-
Would the Hindus object to being aligned with the far Left, instead of the far Right?
There is a big difference between Hindus and Muslims. Hindus are typically peaceful and try to assimilate. Muslims are more often disagreeable, violent and serious troublemakers. Where we live a common scam is for Muslim men to dress in Hijabs and stuff stolen merchandise within their bulky clothing.
Sikhs better still. More useful in a fight than Hindus, generally.
Totally agree.
The Brits had a Gurkha regiment or two in WWII. I’m still not sure why they didn’t similarly raise some Sikh units. We should have done so after 9/11. Instead, we got George Dubya proclaiming Islam a peaceful, friendly religion. Barf.
Dubya has crawled back into his hidey hole with the rest of his dysfunctional clan. Thank God.
I like the Sikhs more. Whilst it is nice that Hindus are generally peaceful and law-abiding they tend not to care that much about the wider community and the indenous population. Like most ethnic groups they prefer to keep to themselves.
Sikhs on the other hand, whilst they don’t ‘assimilate’ into the population through intermarriage and adopting indigenous culture have a very strong belief in helping their compatriots and fellow British citizens. They are well known for opening soup kitchens in the Gurdwarahs and doing lots of charitable work for the community, regardless of their background.
And of course they are fierce patriots who would be the first to sign up to defend the country from a foreign foe.
If all ethnic groups behaved like this multiculturalism wouldn’t be an issue.
Makes you wonder how much intelligence product is nothing more than fantasy.
So, any disagreement with government immigration policies makes one “far right”.
Hey, Hindus, if you’re not to the left of Stalin you’re far right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.