Posted on 03/28/2025 3:32:52 AM PDT by Iron Munro
“In a private Zoom call over the weekend, interim Columbia president Katrina Armstrong told approximately 75 faculty members that, contrary to her public statements, the school has no plans to meet some key demands made by the Trump administration for Columbia to win back $400 million worth of federal funding.
According to a transcript of the call obtained by The Free Press, Armstrong promised that there would be “no change to masking,” and “no change to our admissions procedures,”
both of which the administration has demanded. What’s more, she said the school would not put its Middle Eastern, South Asian, and African Studies (MESAAS) department under “academic receivership” for a minimum of five years—another Trump demand.”
(Excerpt) Read more at gellerreport.com ...
According to a transcript of the call obtained by The Free Press, Armstrong promised that there would be “no change to masking,” and “no change to our admissions procedures,” both of which the administration has demanded. What’s more, she said the school would not put its Middle Eastern, South Asian, and African Studies (MESAAS) department under “academic receivership” for a minimum of five years—another Trump demand.”
Angela Olinto and general counsel Felice Rosan, Armstrong and Olinto downplayed or denied that change was underway, particularly when it came to meeting the Trump administration’s demand to put the school’s Middle East, South Asian, and African Studies department under academic receivership.
“This is not a receivership,” Olinto told the group. “The provost will not be writing or controlling anything. It’s the faculty,” she continued, adding, “Your department is totally independent.”
Columbia’s Middle East Studies department has been a flashpoint in the disputes that have roiled the university since Oct. 7, with critics citing its faculty members as a leading source of anti-Semitism. One of them, Joseph Massad, described the Hamas massacre as “awesome.”
Armstrong went on to say the school had made “no changes” to rules surrounding the sorts of masked protests that plagued the university last year, though Friday’s letter announced that masks are no longer allowed “for the purpose of concealing one’s identity in the commission of violations of University policies or state, municipal, or federal laws.”
The Washington Free Beacon obtained a transcript of the meeting, which seems to have been created because Columbia administrators were unable to disable the Zoom function that generates an audio transcript. The transcript itself captures administrators struggling to prevent the software from creating a transcript and then moving forward without success.
“I am unable to turn it off, for technical reasons, so we’re all just going to have to understand,” an unnamed administrator said at the outset. “This meeting is being transcribed. If you are the requester of this, I would ask you to turn it off.”
“Yeah, that seems to be the default. I keep telling my people to stop this thing,” Olinto, the provost, responded.
Throughout the discussion, Armstrong—who assumed the presidency on an interim basis in August after former Columbia president Minouche Shafik resigned just over a year into the job—fielded questions from furious faculty members. One described the Trump administration’s actions as “the most significant assault on academic culture in my lifetime,” while others pressed her about why the university had not countersued the government.
None of the faculty members, however, raised concerns about the treatment of Jewish and Israeli students on campus or about the conduct of protesters, which led to the cancellation of in-person classes and the school’s graduation ceremony at the close of the last academic year, as well as to the Trump administration’s concern about the climate on the Morningside Heights campus. Just a year ago, a rabbi affiliated with Columbia urged Jewish students to leave campus to celebrate Passover and not to return until conditions on campus had improved.
A Columbia spokeswoman pointed the Free Beacon to a statement Armstrong released Tuesday in which she described “a series of decisive actions we have been taking and will take to combat antisemitism and all forms of discrimination and harassment, including immediately strengthening our processes for enforcement of rules on demonstrations, identification and masking.”
Armstrong described the current situation—in which the administration has cut off approximately $430 million in grant money to the school and is demanding a series of reforms as a precondition to discuss the recovery of those funds—as “unbearable,” and “unwinnable,” and said it was “heartbreaking” that Columbia had to respond to the federal government.
“We have an unbearable situation, just truly unbearable and unwinnable situation where the work that we are moving forward and that we are doing is now seen as in response to an authoritarian regime,” she said. “Because the lawyers must write a letter in response to an investigation, I just want you all to know that that is obviously heartbreaking and I understand that deeply.”
Some faculty members described a sense of befuddlement over the contrast between the posture Armstrong struck on the call and the series of reforms outlined in Friday’s letter.
“There was a massive disconnect between the voice that I heard you start this meeting with, ‘We haven’t changed anything, our policies remain the same’ … and what was in the letter,” one said. “So if the voice that we heard this morning is actually our voice, I think that’s what needs to get said in public, not in a small group like this from you.”
Another worried that the Trump administration would catch on to the fact that “there weren’t many substantial changes.”
“I think they’re going to realize at some point there weren’t many substantial changes, as you’ve been saying. So how will we respond if they come back to us and say that a lot of this is not really substantive?” the faculty member asked. Armstrong described a “Catch-22” in which the school had already been making changes but now appeared to be doing so at the behest of the administration.
Above all, she bemoaned what she described as the “media storm” around Columbia and the press’s distortion of events on campus, faulting herself for “naivete” on the subject and arguing that her own communications pros had fallen down on the job. “I think the media people we had did not anticipate effectively what would happen. Their perception is that you need to let this particular media wave wash over,” she said. “I know how heartbreaking it is to see these media portrayals of what we are.”
“We need a much, much better media story and situation,” she added, “and we have been working very hard over the last weeks to bring in and create better stories and narratives.” To that end, the university had retained the Brunswick Group to help in its communications efforts, she said.
That wasn’t good enough for one frustrated faculty member, who lambasted Armstrong for her failure to effectively navigate the politics of the moment.
He never should have given these commie pigs a second chance. If the research is that important, the researchers will go where the money is. If Columbia says it’s proprietary, sue their asses.
MD from MGH trained to take peoples’ rights away from them
to force “vaccines”.
She, and Columbia, and every federal
grant holder, should now lose ALL their grant fundings.
They DID have their chance. Instead, they LIED.
The ‘Golden Rule’: he who has the gold makes the rules.
We’ve entrusted Trump with spending OUR (taxpayer) money/gold. He makes the rules. Don’t like it, don’t take the money. At this point, the liars at Columbia should be cut off, period.
Ok then the Columbia funding cut is back on… permanently for lying until that woman is fired. Send a message.
Trump admin should drastically cut back on student visas. That will hurt the colleges bottom line since they make more money from those people (and look the other way on some of their cheating). Plus it would benefit American students.
So PDJT changes $400 million to $800 million that Columbia will lose.
“According to a transcript of the call obtained by The Free Press”
I wonder how the Free Press knew or assumed something juicy would be in the transcript of a “private” Zoom call. Maybe they were tipped off by the “one frustrated faculty member, who lambasted Armstrong for her failure to effectively navigate the politics of the moment.”
Nobody seemed to lambaste her for her anti-antisemitism or refusal to adhere to the new rules. The way I took it is that they didn’t think she played the political game well enough.
This anti-American university deserves to DIE. No more funding, let them live off their endowments.
Time for POTUS to up the ante. Reinstitute the hold on federal funding and demand the University President’s resignation as an additional condition for re-instatement. She basically lied to Trump. There should be no second chances after that.
“...interim Columbia president Katrina Armstrong told approximately 75 faculty members that, contrary to her public statements, the school has no plans to meet some key demands made by the Trump administration for Columbia to win back $400 million worth of federal funding.?
IOW, Katrina is a lying bald-faced pony soldier.... riiight?
I'd like to see Attorney General Pam Bondi charge Columbia President Armstrong and her cohorts with attempting to defraud the federal government.
I'm sure there are plenty of different laws on the books that apply to this sort of criminality.
Screw this leftist parasitic organization
“Columbia president Katrina Armstrong told approximately 75 faculty members that, contrary to her public statements, the school has no plans to meet some key demands made by the Trump administration for Columbia to win back $400 million worth of federal funding.”
Fine with me. This will save American taxpayers $400 million. I don’t care what Columbia does, just let them do it with parents’ tuition money. If the parents aren’t smart enough to stop shelling out money to an armpit like Columbia, that’s their problem.
Looks like a younger Rosie O Donnell without glasses.
I would say permanently. Screw them. She’s fired another liberal nutjob will take their place
Wait so she’s the interim president, and basically no better than the one they just fired. Cut them off permanently. They will just keep hiring more group think liberals for the presidential position. Let them die on the vine so to speak.
Meanwhile...
And it’s just sitting there.
Untaxed.
And almost a trillion in endowments nationwide.
Untaxed.
The white house will never hear of this...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.