Posted on 03/18/2025 6:58:02 AM PDT by hardspunned
Less than 12 hours after I exposed Judge James Boasberg’s conflict of interest with his daughter Katharine Boasberg, who works for a 501c3 called “Partners For Justice” @PFJ_USA that gives criminal illegal aliens and gang members legal advice, Katharine Boasberg has DELETED her @LinkedIn page and her Instagram account.
I have exclusively uncovered a massive CONFLICT OF INTEREST involving Judge James Boasberg, the Chief judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Judge Boasberg recently made the decision to prevent the deportation of criminal illegal alien gang members on planes out of the country.
This is enough for President Trump’s legal team to push for a MOTION FOR RECUSAL for Judge Boasberg.
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
What is it with all these fag Feral “judges” and their little princess daughters?
I wonder what pressure point he has for which he’s endanger his daughter…
Has any Republican House member called for Boasberg’s impeachment? Or are House Republicans waiting for medical science to perfect testicular and spinal transplants?
Good for Laura.
Thanks for posting.That alone should get him impeached
Can we trade Bondi for Laura?
How about that.
Family ties that encourage invasions of a sovereign nation.
Sic em
Recuse!
Sounds like someone got her USAID cut off.
Trump needs to sue the crap out of this Boasberg biatch. Deportation is the job of the Executive branch. The “judges” need to keep their DemonRATs’ asses out of it. A bunch of fag judgeys doing favors for their far left little RAT princesses.
Whether the daughter strictly requires refusal, these judges should avoid the appeaance of conflict and offer to step aside.
And the daughter hiding her involvement now adds to the appearance that this is affecting the judge’s impartiality.
But if we’re waiting for leftists to be ethical, it will never happen.
Here are the cold hard facts for Chief Justice John Roberts and his toady Barrett. Judicial legitimacy was on the ballot. Those media outlets JR and ACB watch all promoted the view that J6 was an insurrection. Trump was guilty of every crime from keeping classified documents to exaggerating the value of real estate. I can't even keep track of all of the cases against Trump.
7 or 7 swing states.
Popular vote win.
Voters no longer trust the judiciary on matters involving Trump and his supporters. For good reason. Against long standing constitutional law doctrine on the Speedy Trial Clause, DC trial court judges denied change of venue motions for J6 defendants. There was no legitimate reason to delay trials due to a "backlog," where there were multiple nearby venues to hear their case.
Everyone knows why DC judges kept those cases in DC. Juries voted to convicted in 100% of cases. This is IMPOSSIBLE in any other context. John Roberts worked for years in private practice, and every lawyers knows this to be true, "Juries do crazy things."
There will always be a runaway jury that convicts an innocent man and frees a guilty one. This is human nature.
Yet this well-worn rule of human nature and litigation experience found one exception. Our nation's capital.
Had J6 cases been tried in other venues, there would have been some acquittals.
Alexander Hamilton wrote in the Federalist Paper No 78 that the judiciary, unlike the Executive and Legislative branches, has "no influence over either the sword or the purse." Hence judges must not exceed their appointed role, nor legislative from the branch.
Americans are watching DC judges appoint themselves as Head of HR, by demanding fired employees be reinstated. Now a judge, who cooperated with FISA court fraud, and himself should have been impeached and removed from office, has proclaimed he has the power to determine how Trump may use his power in matters of removing illegal immigrants who belong to terrorist gangs.
Trump can say, No. Courts can issue contempt findings. Who is going to serve the arrest warrants? US Marshals? The Marshalls fall under Executive authority.
Congress, of course, has the power to impeach and remove Trump from office. Judges lack any such authority, and it would be unfathomable to our Founders to see this vulgar power grab and use of show trials in DC.
Because Trump's actions are popular at the 80-20 or even 90-10 level, there is no appetite for the democratic remedy of impeachment.
In this conflict between activist judges, some of whom sleep in the same beds (literally) of people who represent the opposing side and work for Trump-hater groups, Trump will win.
This is not my opinion. This was proven this last November.
Judges must conduct themselves appropriately, which is to say, they must admit Trump has the power to deport illegal criminals, fire employees, and interpret the full use of his Article 2 powers independently.
Hyper-partisan judges drunk on stolen power haven't thought this through. They will lose the standoff.
For the sake of the country, Roberts must bring these lower courts to heel.
Otherwise judges will be in the position of issuing orders Trump is not obliged to follow, and as is his prerogative, he will not obey them.
recusal
ping
Make her famous, MAGA..
No, we can't...sorry bubba.
Judge trying to be a hero to his brainwashed daughter.
Charge them both with conspiracy, because that’s what this is, then ignore any further requests or demands from the judge.
Let it go to SCOTUS, see what happens.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.