Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

West Virginia senators pass bill that would define ‘man’ and ‘woman’
MetroNews ^ | 3/3/25 | Brad McElhinny

Posted on 03/03/2025 1:56:18 PM PST by DallasBiff

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: SkyDancer

Ask Mizzz Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson ... She gave sworn testimony as to being incompetent to make that definition.


21 posted on 03/03/2025 2:56:49 PM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

My cat and dog know the difference and they didn’t even go to law school.


22 posted on 03/03/2025 3:04:06 PM PST by SkyDancer ( ~ Am Yisrael Chai ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

It’s a shame that it’s necessary.


23 posted on 03/03/2025 3:18:51 PM PST by libertylover (Our biggest problem, by far, is that almost all of big media is AGENDA-DRIVEN, not-truth driven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ghost of nixon
That's my kind of simple truth.

And a note on the language: One's "gender" is not "assigned" at birth. What happens at birth is that one's sex is recorded.

24 posted on 03/03/2025 3:21:57 PM PST by libertylover (Our biggest problem, by far, is that almost all of big media is AGENDA-DRIVEN, not-truth driven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: libertylover

Nice. Good job. It’s high time to wrest the language from the Marxists. We are making great strides in this area, simply because people are refusing to be steamrolled.


25 posted on 03/03/2025 3:25:04 PM PST by Kudsman (We shall come rejoicing, bringing in the sheaves. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NurdlyPeon

That’s not a 100% definition because it doesn’t account for people born with intersex chromosome conditions who don’t produce either cell. Some people born with chimeric conditions have the tissue meant for producing both. What are the legal consequences for someone who doesn’t meet the definition of either a man or a woman under a law that further insists everyone must be one or the other?


26 posted on 03/03/2025 3:35:35 PM PST by Syllojism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Syllojism

Only about 100 or so cases of chimerism have been recorded in modern medical literature. I suppose you would have to handle it on a case by case basis. Still, it’s a lesser amount than people who have genetic abnormalities.


27 posted on 03/03/2025 4:26:52 PM PST by NurdlyPeon (It is the nature of liberals to pervert whatever they touch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Ketanji jackson should have attended west virginia schools.


28 posted on 03/03/2025 4:26:55 PM PST by If You Want It Fixed - Fix It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

That is defined even before birth and confirmed at birth.


29 posted on 03/03/2025 4:33:42 PM PST by californian by choice (Who are those who believe in science?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Up next - Apples vs. Oranges


30 posted on 03/03/2025 4:35:54 PM PST by P.O.E. (Pray for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson