Posted on 02/26/2025 7:41:42 AM PST by Morgana
Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers is under fire for an absurdly woke proposal that demeans women by calling them “inseminated persons.”
The proposed changes include replacing gender-specific terms such as “mother” and “father” with more inclusive language like “inseminated person” and “parent.” For instance, “paternity” would be updated to “parentage,” and “husband” or “wife” would be substituted with “spouse.”
Evers has defended these proposed changes, emphasizing that they are intended to provide legal clarity for individuals undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures within Wisconsin.
“What we want is legal certainty that moms will be able to get the care they need. That’s it, end of story,” Ever said, as if mothers are not receiving proper care when called women or mothers.
The proposal has sparked significant controversy and backlash, particularly from Republican lawmakers and conservative commentators. Critics argue that replacing traditional terms like “mother” with “inseminated person” undermines the role of women in childbirth and parenting.
Representative Tom Tiffany expressed his disapproval, stating, “This isn’t just crazy—it’s an insult to women who give birth and raise children.”
The debate has extended beyond political figures, with public personalities also weighing in.
Former Green Bay Packers quarterback Brett Favre labeled the proposal as “nonsense,” reflecting a broader sentiment among those who view the changes as unnecessary and dismissive of traditional family roles. Opponents contend that such language alterations are examples of excessive political correctness and could lead to confusion in legal contexts.
This initiative is part of Governor Evers’ broader efforts to modernize state laws and ensure they align with the leftist woke agenda.
As the proposal moves through the legislative process, it is expected to face rigorous debate. The outcome will likely have significant implications not only for legal documentation related to family and reproductive matters but also for the broader discourse on gender identity and inclusivity in legal language. The discussions in Wisconsin may serve as a precedent for other states grappling with similar issues, highlighting the evolving nature of language and its impact on societal norms.
“No, he’s just inseminated.”
Very, very good.
wy69
What about lesbos? They don’t get inseminated.
The sexual deviant males won’t stop until they can make an additive to permanently sterilize every women.
Whatever happened to “birthing persons”? Did that go by the wayside?
And all this time I thought “cheesehead” was a nickname for Green Bay Packers fans. Apparently, it’s actually a medical condition which afflicts at least 50.1% of Wisconsin voters.
No. But he may very well be a sperm receptacle.
This is a graphic depiction of what the Word calls “being handed over to a reprobate mind.”
“Reprobation” is spiritual psychopathy/sociopathy and the clinical description is found in Rom. 1:18-32 and II Tim. 3:1-5.
What about mothers by adoption?
Update: at the end of Wednesday’s show, Gutfeld made an announcement about the birth of Kat’s baby boy and also about her cancer (was optimistic about them being able to get rid of it), and expressed hope she would be able to return to his show in a couple of months.
My calendar does not have enough room to write “Inseminated Person’s Day.” Is my grandmother now a grandinseminated person? Is the word “sister” now obsolete? “Aunt?” Since “dad” is a past tense name for an insemination, what’s the past tense word for “inseminator?”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.