Posted on 12/27/2024 6:57:31 AM PST by SJackson
For Palestinians, Syria is a closing door and an opening window
The Assads, father and son, always claimed to be the defenders of the Palestinians against the Zionist entity. The truth is quite otherwise. More on how the Assads used and abused the Palestinians can be found here: “For Palestinians, Syria is a closing door and an opening window – analysis,” by Elias Zananiri, The Media Line, December 16, 2024:
The Syrian regime under Hafez Assad and his son, Bashar, had always been a puzzle for the Palestinians. They couldn’t figure out if it was a regime they loved to hate or they hated to love.
Although Syria had the chance to play a pivotal role in the region, it focused on fighting the Palestinians a lot more than the effort it made to fight Israel, the perceived occupier of the Palestinian people. Ask any Palestinian about the Syrian regime under the father and later his son, and he will immediately tell you it never shot a bullet at Israel after the 1973 October War. For the Palestinian majority, this is not only an indication but damning evidence that Syria was not on the side of the Palestinian national rights.
The Syrian regime offered lots of lip service to the Palestinians. Still, it spared no effort to take over the PLO and turn it into a Syrian proxy, like Ahmed Jibril’s Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command (PFLP-GC) and Zuheir Mohsen’s As-Sa’iqa, Arabic for thunderbolt. Most Palestinians in Syria knew these two as senior officers in the country’s secret service….
The story of Bashar Sharif Ali Saleh, a Palestinian from the West Bank city of Jenin, illustrates how ruthless Jibril’s personality was.
Bashar was released upon the collapse of the Assad regime after spending 40 years in Syrian jails because Ahmad Jibril considered him a person of interest. In an interview with him at the Palestinian embassy in Damascus after his release, Bashar said he joined the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestinian territories -General Command, PFLP-GC, whose leader then was Ahmad Jibril.
One day, Bashar and a few volunteers were sitting in a room when Jibril suddenly entered. Everybody rose except for Bashar. “I know it was a mistake that I didn’t stand up, and instead, I shook Jibril’s hand while seated,” Bashar said.
He added: “I should have behaved like the others. Jibril ordered his men to shave my head, strip me of my military uniform, and take me to jail. Since then, I was moved to three different jails, the last of which was Adra prison.” Before Adra, Bashar served 12 years in Sednaya Prison, the notorious torture center near Damascus. Videos and interviews with prisoners held in Sednaya and released by combatants belonging to Hay’at Tahrir Al-Sham (Organization for the Liberation of the Levant) or HTS told unbelievable stories of how their wardens treated them….
Bashar Sharif Ali Saleh spent more than 12 years in Sednaya Prison because he had failed to stand up when Ahmed Jibril, the head of Syrian-allied PFLP, entered the room. It is that kind of detail that conveys the full horror of the Assad regime and its Palestinian allies.
Walid Barakat is a Palestinian who flew to Damascus in 1982 to enroll in one of its universities. He was arrested upon arrival and sent to three different prisons until he was taken to Sednaya Prison in 2001, where he stayed until his release after HTS combatants stormed Damascus. He couldn’t even tell why he was arrested….
The Assad regime would arrest and imprison Palestinians at will; no reason was ever given for most of these sentences. Anyone perceived as a threat to the regime would be immediately picked up. Did Walid Barakat let slip some anti-regime sentiment before he went to Damascus, that an Assad agent overheard and reported, and Barakat spent 42 years of his life in prison as a result?
Assad was not interested in the Palestinians except insofar as he could use some of them, under his threat, to help maintain Syrian control of Lebanon. He “never fired a shot” against Israel.
Ahmed al-Sharaa, the HTS leader, expressed his belief that Syria needs to democratize all its institutions. Known by his nom de guerre Abu Mohammed al-Golani, al-Sharaa told a Syrian television channel that many domestic issues in Syria need urgent treatment and solutions. Therefore, he added, the leaders of the new regime are not out there to fight Israel.
“We want the Iranian presence in Syria to end so Israel would have no more excuses to attack Syria,” he said. He sounded more like a leftist rather than an Islamist as he reasonably discussed the future he expects for Syria. He said, “Syria needs a transformation from the mentality of revolting against the tyranny of Assad’s regime into a state mentality where issues must be dealt with collectively and in cooperation with all segments of the society.”
Since he quit al-Qaida, al-Sharaa has done his homework correctly. He dropped his nom de guerre and preferred to be called by his real name. He also removed his al-Qaida camouflage, as he understood that it would not encourage the Syrian public to support him and his group. Modernizing Syrian governance is genuinely needed, and al-Sharaa is convinced that he and his colleagues in the new country’s command must follow this line.
It’s hard to know if al-Sharaa’s claim to have abandoned the jihadist beliefs he held for so long is sincere. Right now he is so focused on three things: first, persuading the West to lift its sanctions on Syria; second, having the West remove the designation of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham as a terrorist organization; third, having the West supply aid so that Syria can start to rebuild. He is willing to say anything that will further those goals. No one seems to know if he can be trusted; the Israelis, quite rightly, are acting on the assumption that he cannot, and the IDF is determined to deprive Syria of its military assets through a campaign of sustained bombing that has already reduced those assets to 20% of what they were just a few weeks ago. Now Syria has been stripped of the wherewithal to harm the Jewish state.
It is uncertain if Syria will become a Western-style democracy. Only time can tell if Syria is moving in that direction. From a Palestinian perspective, it is better to have a neutral Syria than a country that proclaims to support the Palestinian national struggle while it does nothing. A senior Fatah member who graduated in Syria and spent most of his years in the country said he would prefer to see Syria sitting on the fence watching what happens in the region to a Syria that stabs the Palestinian people in their back. He added that Syria “is a closing door and an opening window.”
“We hope it will be a window of positive and fruitful change in a country that deserves to live in a democratic regime honoring human rights and individual liberties.”
As De Gaulle skeptically said on another occasion, “Vaste programme, monsieur.”
Related threads
Israeli politicians react to [Islamic Palestinian stabbing] murder of elderly Holocaust survivor.
Rare oil lamp with Temple menorah found from time when Romans barred Jews from Jerusalem
WHO chief and UN team caught up in Israeli strikes that killed six in Yemen
Keeps coming up in my head....No such thing as a Palestinian. They’re Muslims....through and through...with a few Christians on the side lines.
The muslim nations never had any use for Yassar and his band of gypsys. King Hussein kicked them out of Jordan and they infiltrated into Gaza. Arafat was agitating, guess he was a community organizer. We know where Barry Soetoro learned it. All of the muslims know they are bad news.
Syria, Jordan, Egypt none of them wanted a Palestinian state. They wanted the land and resources for themselves. When Egypt controlled Gaza and Jordan controlled the West Bank there was no Palestinian independence movement. Only after losing multiple wars did these countries decide the juice isn’t worth the squeeze so they made peace terms with Israel to surrender their claims to the “Palestinians” and outsourced the violence to Fatah and the PLO, then replaced by Islamist groups. Though not without a lot of blowback on themselves eg the attempted coup in Jordan and the civil war in Lebanon all sparked by the PLO.
People who don’t get it are just willfully ignorant. There were no “Palestinians” until after the Arab states lost the 1967 war.
Jordan annexed the West Bank in 1950, though largely unrecognized, but the opposite of independence. Egypt had better sense.
That’s true.
The Hama massacre (Arabic: مجزرة حماة) occurred in February 1982 when the Syrian Arab Army and the Defense Companies paramilitary force, under the orders of President Hafez al-Assad, besieged the town of Hama for 27 days in order to quell an uprising by the Muslim Brotherhood against the Ba'athist government. The campaign that had begun in 1976 by Sunni Muslim groups, including the Muslim Brotherhood, was brutally crushed in an anti-Sunni massacre at Hama, carried out by the Syrian Arab Army and Alawite militias under the command of Major General Rifaat al-Assad.Prior to the start of operations, Hafez al-Assad issued orders to seal off Hama from the outside world; effectively imposing a media blackout, total shut down of communications, electricity and food supplies to the city for months. Initial diplomatic reports from Western countries stated that 1,000 were killed. Subsequent estimates vary, with the lower estimates reporting at least 10,000 deaths, while others put the number at 20,000 (Robert Fisk) or 40,000 (Syrian Human Rights Committee and SNHR). The massacre remains the "single deadliest act" of violence perpetrated by an Arab state upon its own population in the history of the Modern Middle East.
Nearly two-thirds of the city was destroyed in the Ba'athist military operation. Robert Fisk, who was present at Hama during the events of the massacre, reported that indiscriminate bombing had razed much of the city to the ground and that the vast majority of the victims were civilians. Patrick Seale, reporting in The Globe and Mail, described the operation as a "two-week orgy of killing, destruction and looting" which destroyed the city and killed a minimum of 25,000 inhabitants.
while it may be convenient for the author to use the term “Palestinian” .. there is no such thing in history (other than the Jewish people under Roman occupation long ago). Using more accurate language would be a step towards a rational discussion. The entire “Palestinian” false narrative was invented by the Soviet Union KGB (secret police) as part of its anti-West propaganda war.
The Soviet Union is (at least officially) long gone but, as Shakespeare’s Mark Anthony put it, “The evil that men do lives after them; the good is oft interred with their bones.”
During the mandate period, the Jews residing there were referred to as Palestinians. After statehood, the Palestine Post became the Jerusalem Post, the Anglo Palestine bank Bank Leumi. The then well known Palestine Football Association, recognized by FIFA, had only Jewish players because Arabs refused to play on it.
yes thanks
since Palestinian was invented as a perjorative term to begin with,
perhaps someday the Arab Occupiers of the Jewish Promised Land will wake up and go back to calling themselves Arabs again. Sane people don’t voluntarily adopt insulting names for themselves (though it has happened).
And maybe they’ll decide to give up the invasion and false narrative and return home, too. It will certainly be much better for their children. We can hope, and pray.
Most of the Arab “Palestinian” political leadership has been tools of or used as proxies for some Middle East nation’s leaders, all of whom sought to use the “Palestinian cause” against Israel for their own interests. If not for all of that the Arabs of Palestine may have, in their own self interest, made full peace with Israel decades ago.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.