Mammoth spending bill has clause that would let Congress block subpoenas for House data, "potentially preventing any investigation into the J6 Committee"

Not The Bee ^ | December 18, 2001 | Staff

[Red Badger]

THE ONLY THING GOVERNMENT EVER PROTECTS IS ITSELF...............

[1Old Pro]

I hope it goes down to defeat, been sick of this crap for too long.

[rktman]

Trying? If they’d take about 1,540 pages out, it might be okay.

[vivenne]

Doubt it—it will pass.

[Red Badger]

Hears what a CR should read:

Government is hereby funded at the same rate as the last fiscal year.

[sauropod]

Dpn’t like Benny Johnson. But he has a point.

[Openurmind]

Absolute Fraud... That has absolutely nothing to do with spending.

[Blue Highway]

How come Fox News isn’t even discussing the pork in this CR bill?

[BigEdLB]

Add the clause, “ until January 21, 2025.”

[bitt]

p

[PGR88]

The Swamp never dies.

[Openurmind]

They will pass it. They need their cut before they head out of town on vacation.

[1Old Pro]

it will pass.

Likely

[Openurmind]

“How come Fox News isn’t even discussing the pork in this CR bill?”

Because FOX is Deep State. They are even owned by lefties.

[trad_anglican]

I hope Trump makes it clear to congress on day one that he will not sign any CR and that they need to do their job.

[Shady]

VOTE IT DOWN!!!!

[taxcontrol]

It is my understanding of the rules of Congress, that if just one member requests, the bill must be read aloud. Can this bill be delayed until the new Congress is sworn in?

[Blue Highway]

They just made a few passing comments on CR saying how small it was (sarcastically) and then chuckling.

[Obadiah]

That provision - alone - should torpedo the whole ugly thing. Everything they force on the people they exclude themselves.

Obamacare - Congress excluded

Insider Trading - Congress excluded

Covid vaccination - Congress excluded

DOJ/FBI investigation - Congress effectively excluded

Just Say No.