Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shasta supervisors declare election results under duress; fail to secure Denver flights
krcr ^ | 12/10/2024 | Ashley Harting, Mike Mangas

Posted on 12/11/2024 6:51:01 AM PST by cuz1961

The Shasta County Board of Supervisors voted 5-0 on Tuesday afternoon to declare the December election results "under duress." Two board members, Mary Rickert and Tim Garman, refuted the declaration and the other three supervisors felt they were forced to vote in favor of the decision by the state.

The declaration is largely

ceremonial,

Registrar of Voters Tom Toller explained as results were certified and sent to the Secretary of State on Tuesday, Dec. 3.

(Excerpt) Read more at krcrtv.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: california; election
"ceremonial"

hmm, now where have i heard THAT before ?

1 posted on 12/11/2024 6:51:01 AM PST by cuz1961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cuz1961
Certification is one thing, it's what I do in my role as the election official for Shasta County, and it is governed by the election code and it involves my signature under oath, under penalty of perjury, certifying the official results and sending them to the Secretary of State. Once the Secretary of State receives those, it is a done deal," said Toller. "That ship has sailed!" 82f204b6-73bc-4781-9a7d-7f8ba6a44c52-Toller2 .
2 posted on 12/11/2024 6:58:37 AM PST by cuz1961 (Isaiah 53:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

California state bill could stop Shasta County’s effort to hand count
ballots

A decision earlier this year by Shasta County supervisors to upend their elections system has drawn the attention of California lawmakers.
Introduced by Assemblymember Gail Pellerin, D-Santa Cruz, AB 969 directly targets Shasta County.

This year, the county’s board of supervisors voted to scrap their current voting system based on unproven claims of election fraud.

During a state senate committee meeting Wednesday, Pellerin said the bill would ban hand-counting in elections with more than 1,000 registered voters. Shasta County has over 100,000 voters.

https://www.ijpr.org/politics-government/2023-06-28/california-state-bill-could-stop-shasta-countys-effort-to-hand-count-ballots


3 posted on 12/11/2024 7:14:15 AM PST by artichokegrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

So how does Dominion pay Gail Pellerin? Do they bolster her favorite investments or use some offshore account obfuscation?


4 posted on 12/11/2024 7:18:23 AM PST by MikelTackNailer (Govt wisely keeps me from having nice things by giving that money to Ukraine and illegals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

Mt. Shasta has some interesting people.
By the way, Mount Shasta is in Siskiyou County.


5 posted on 12/11/2024 7:20:31 AM PST by sasquatch (Do NOT forget Ashli Babbit! c/o piytar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

More people who think they are more important than they are.


6 posted on 12/11/2024 7:38:09 AM PST by bigbob (Yes. We ARE going back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
This year, the county’s board of supervisors voted to scrap their current voting system based on unproven claims of election fraud.

As we all know after 2020, it is impossible to prove election fraud if it is serious enough because you will never get your day in court.

7 posted on 12/11/2024 7:41:53 AM PST by Pontiac (esse welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

A big part of the problem in my opinion is the inability to see the source code these machines use to count the ballots. Until we get there, I will never trust these machine tabulators until the source code is open source and checksum verfied with the ability to obtain the checksum of the code running at the time of tabulation on election day. That’s all the way through to the certification level if it involves multiple machines in the chain of custody. Furthermore, these machines need to have much better security or the inability to be accessed via the open internet.

I have written a lot of software that branches to different routines depending on the time and date of execution. In an election scenario, the verification/certification process done before the election can be using one routine THEN when election day comes, a different nefarious routine could be executed to siphon off votes from one party and give to the other.

The big “tell” in my opinion is when Dominion (IIRC) fought tooth and nail to keep their source code from being examined citing “trade secrets” or some BS like that.


8 posted on 12/11/2024 8:20:55 AM PST by copaliscrossing (The truth is always your friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

So what is wrong with maintaining your integrity? To hell with state duress.


9 posted on 12/11/2024 8:34:05 AM PST by Retain Mike ( Sat Cong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: copaliscrossing

“The big “tell” in my opinion is when Dominion (IIRC) fought tooth and nail to keep their source code from being examined citing “trade secrets” or some BS like that.”

probably 90% of the people on my linkedin could write a better set of voting software than dominion.

really there should no trade secrets there, they just don’t want people looking at it and seeing what a Fuster Cuck their code is.

If there are any “trade secrets” they are the routines that trade votes to the designated winner


10 posted on 12/11/2024 8:58:12 AM PST by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

I am sick to death of “officials” certifying under duress. If certification is their responsibility, then dissenters must prove why certification is the right course of action, not demand it in absence of evidence!

STAND YOUR GROUND!

Do not take an action—this is for anyone anywhere!—that goes against your conscience!


11 posted on 12/11/2024 9:58:09 AM PST by pgyanke (Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: copaliscrossing
the start of this current fubar was

invisible ink

over-spray that resulted in hart system

( we ditched dominion and replaced it with probably the same machines just with a hart logo on the out side )

that rejected 50 % of ballots when scanned.

invisible ink ?

kinda negates the function of a printing press doesnt it? ? using invisible ink that is ?

isn't printing meant to produce something you can see ?

what printer uses invisible ink ?

how dumb do they think we are ?

12 posted on 12/11/2024 10:19:09 AM PST by cuz1961 (Isaiah 53:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson