Posted on 12/11/2024 6:51:01 AM PST by cuz1961
The Shasta County Board of Supervisors voted 5-0 on Tuesday afternoon to declare the December election results "under duress." Two board members, Mary Rickert and Tim Garman, refuted the declaration and the other three supervisors felt they were forced to vote in favor of the decision by the state.
The declaration is largely
ceremonial,
Registrar of Voters Tom Toller explained as results were certified and sent to the Secretary of State on Tuesday, Dec. 3.
(Excerpt) Read more at krcrtv.com ...
hmm, now where have i heard THAT before ?
.
California state bill could stop Shasta County’s effort to hand count
ballots
A decision earlier this year by Shasta County supervisors to upend their elections system has drawn the attention of California lawmakers.
Introduced by Assemblymember Gail Pellerin, D-Santa Cruz, AB 969 directly targets Shasta County.
This year, the county’s board of supervisors voted to scrap their current voting system based on unproven claims of election fraud.
During a state senate committee meeting Wednesday, Pellerin said the bill would ban hand-counting in elections with more than 1,000 registered voters. Shasta County has over 100,000 voters.
So how does Dominion pay Gail Pellerin? Do they bolster her favorite investments or use some offshore account obfuscation?
Mt. Shasta has some interesting people.
By the way, Mount Shasta is in Siskiyou County.
More people who think they are more important than they are.
As we all know after 2020, it is impossible to prove election fraud if it is serious enough because you will never get your day in court.
A big part of the problem in my opinion is the inability to see the source code these machines use to count the ballots. Until we get there, I will never trust these machine tabulators until the source code is open source and checksum verfied with the ability to obtain the checksum of the code running at the time of tabulation on election day. That’s all the way through to the certification level if it involves multiple machines in the chain of custody. Furthermore, these machines need to have much better security or the inability to be accessed via the open internet.
I have written a lot of software that branches to different routines depending on the time and date of execution. In an election scenario, the verification/certification process done before the election can be using one routine THEN when election day comes, a different nefarious routine could be executed to siphon off votes from one party and give to the other.
The big “tell” in my opinion is when Dominion (IIRC) fought tooth and nail to keep their source code from being examined citing “trade secrets” or some BS like that.
So what is wrong with maintaining your integrity? To hell with state duress.
“The big “tell” in my opinion is when Dominion (IIRC) fought tooth and nail to keep their source code from being examined citing “trade secrets” or some BS like that.”
probably 90% of the people on my linkedin could write a better set of voting software than dominion.
really there should no trade secrets there, they just don’t want people looking at it and seeing what a Fuster Cuck their code is.
If there are any “trade secrets” they are the routines that trade votes to the designated winner
I am sick to death of “officials” certifying under duress. If certification is their responsibility, then dissenters must prove why certification is the right course of action, not demand it in absence of evidence!
STAND YOUR GROUND!
Do not take an action—this is for anyone anywhere!—that goes against your conscience!
invisible ink
over-spray that resulted in hart system
( we ditched dominion and replaced it with probably the same machines just with a hart logo on the out side )
that rejected 50 % of ballots when scanned.
invisible ink ?
kinda negates the function of a printing press doesnt it? ? using invisible ink that is ?
isn't printing meant to produce something you can see ?
what printer uses invisible ink ?
how dumb do they think we are ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.