Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biden-Harris Regime Quietly Amends Directive Against Assassination of Americans
Headline USA ^ | 10/07/2024 | Luis Cornelio

Posted on 10/08/2024 8:05:09 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 10/08/2024 8:05:09 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

When they tell you whom they are, believe them.
They intend to murder their opposition and justify it.


2 posted on 10/08/2024 8:08:08 AM PDT by Texas_Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Thanks


3 posted on 10/08/2024 8:14:09 AM PDT by Faith65 (Isaiah 40:31 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Guy

Is Biden afraid that the full story of the Butler assassination attempt will come out?


4 posted on 10/08/2024 8:14:19 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Of course, the CIA is an independent agency, not part of the DOD.


5 posted on 10/08/2024 8:14:51 AM PDT by Signalman (I am not a snob. Ask anyone who matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There’s this thing called “karma”:...what goes around comes around.
They might want to rethink about that for a good, long while.


6 posted on 10/08/2024 8:16:53 AM PDT by lgjhn23 ("On the 8th day, Satan created the progressive liberal to destroy all the good that God created..." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Altering "man's" law is something that is done daily... ALTERING GOD'S LAW is IMPOSSIBLE!

SOMEONE, or SOMEONES, will PAY the PRICE for the "malice of heart" of intending to go against GOD"S LAW!

7 posted on 10/08/2024 8:17:05 AM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The only way the DoD rules would pertain to U.S. Civilians is if they plan to implement Martial Law. Sounds like they are setting up the prerequisites they will need.


8 posted on 10/08/2024 8:22:07 AM PDT by Openurmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

“Is Biden afraid that the full story of the Butler assassination attempt will come out?”

They are pre-planning Martial Law.


9 posted on 10/08/2024 8:24:10 AM PDT by Openurmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They’re truly monsters. But, it’s all part of the run up to the Great Tribulation that’s coming. Scoff at your own peril, but every word in the Bible will come to pass, just as it was written. Even a peek into the future is truly terrifying; a culmination of all the evil that ever has been. If you don’t know Jesus, call on Him now, before it’s too late. You have nothing (of any value) to lose, and everything (of any worth) to gain.


10 posted on 10/08/2024 8:32:02 AM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Openurmind
The only way the DoD rules would pertain to U.S. Civilians is if they plan to implement Martial Law.

I think the civilians they are referring to are civilian employees at the DOD. Unless I read it wrong.

11 posted on 10/08/2024 8:32:20 AM PDT by usurper (AI was born with a birth defect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

BTTT


12 posted on 10/08/2024 8:40:43 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There are 2 parts to this. Not only did they take out the “under no circumstances”, they also changed the language from “shall” to “will”. At https://astoriacre.com/shall-vs-will-understanding-the-difference-in-legal-contracts/ it explains that “shall” describes a legal obligation. “Will” only expresses an intent or promise, without any legal obligation.

So in 2 different ways the Biden-Harris regime changed this part to be much more ambiguous than it has been.

And this was done 12 days after the 2nd (widely-known) attempt on Trump’s life and 7 days after Congress directed the SS to provide equal protection to former Presidents and Presidential candidates as to current Presidents and VP’s.

Seems to me that the current regime is positioning its Secret Service operatives to have a “rogue” operative assassinate Trump. And their excuse will be “We never intended to have someone assassinate a threat worse than Hitler...”


13 posted on 10/08/2024 8:42:26 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usurper

“he Biden-Harris administration amended a Bush-era directive against the assassination of Americans >as it pertains to law enforcement activities in intelligence collection and national security.<


14 posted on 10/08/2024 8:49:14 AM PDT by Openurmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Guy

That road goes both ways..


15 posted on 10/08/2024 8:53:49 AM PDT by dpetty121263
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Notice that in (m) it says that other federal agencies working in agreement with the DoD don’t have to abide by these “rules” if the SecDef writes a memo granting an exception or if the President issues a directive or EO (some of which remain classified, if I understand correctly).

IOW, if I’m understanding it correctly, this “issuance” is not binding for federal agencies or departments cooerating with the DoD if the SecDef or President issues a (possibly classified) exception.

So, for instance, if the DoD says that Iran is trying to assassinate Trump and requests the Secret Service to assist them in thwarting those attempts, either the SecDef or Biden (or his controllers, let’s be honest) can write a classified directive or memo telling Secret Service that they don’t have to abide by this already-watered-down “intention” to not assassinate anybody.

If I’m misunderstanding this, somebody please correct me. Notice also that the language in this “issuance” preceding the part that removes the “under no circumstances” uses the word MUST. If these bureaucrats eliminated the word “shall” because they feared “shall” would be confusing, then they would have used the word “must” just like they did in this issuance right before they suddenly changed the language to “will”. This is deliberate - not just trying to get rid of any ambiguity from the word “shall”.


16 posted on 10/08/2024 8:58:37 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Geeze, I wonder why they would telegraph their intent like this. Seems like to me they would just ignore the rules like they normally do rather than making a public change, even a ‘quiet one’..


17 posted on 10/08/2024 9:06:25 AM PDT by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flaming Conservative

Amen.


18 posted on 10/08/2024 9:06:56 AM PDT by waterhill (I Believe! Eph. 5:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LegendHasIt

Intimidation of the citizenry.


19 posted on 10/08/2024 9:12:42 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lgjhn23

To me it’s like this: they either think that there will be no blowback if they pull off what it looks like they want to pull off, or they’re not worried about it because they believe they can handle it.


20 posted on 10/08/2024 9:13:23 AM PDT by hoagy62 (Don't let evil win again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson