Posted on 10/08/2024 8:05:09 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
When they tell you whom they are, believe them.
They intend to murder their opposition and justify it.
Thanks
Is Biden afraid that the full story of the Butler assassination attempt will come out?
Of course, the CIA is an independent agency, not part of the DOD.
There’s this thing called “karma”:...what goes around comes around.
They might want to rethink about that for a good, long while.
SOMEONE, or SOMEONES, will PAY the PRICE for the "malice of heart" of intending to go against GOD"S LAW!
The only way the DoD rules would pertain to U.S. Civilians is if they plan to implement Martial Law. Sounds like they are setting up the prerequisites they will need.
“Is Biden afraid that the full story of the Butler assassination attempt will come out?”
They are pre-planning Martial Law.
They’re truly monsters. But, it’s all part of the run up to the Great Tribulation that’s coming. Scoff at your own peril, but every word in the Bible will come to pass, just as it was written. Even a peek into the future is truly terrifying; a culmination of all the evil that ever has been. If you don’t know Jesus, call on Him now, before it’s too late. You have nothing (of any value) to lose, and everything (of any worth) to gain.
I think the civilians they are referring to are civilian employees at the DOD. Unless I read it wrong.
BTTT
There are 2 parts to this. Not only did they take out the “under no circumstances”, they also changed the language from “shall” to “will”. At https://astoriacre.com/shall-vs-will-understanding-the-difference-in-legal-contracts/ it explains that “shall” describes a legal obligation. “Will” only expresses an intent or promise, without any legal obligation.
So in 2 different ways the Biden-Harris regime changed this part to be much more ambiguous than it has been.
And this was done 12 days after the 2nd (widely-known) attempt on Trump’s life and 7 days after Congress directed the SS to provide equal protection to former Presidents and Presidential candidates as to current Presidents and VP’s.
Seems to me that the current regime is positioning its Secret Service operatives to have a “rogue” operative assassinate Trump. And their excuse will be “We never intended to have someone assassinate a threat worse than Hitler...”
“he Biden-Harris administration amended a Bush-era directive against the assassination of Americans >as it pertains to law enforcement activities in intelligence collection and national security.<
That road goes both ways..
Notice that in (m) it says that other federal agencies working in agreement with the DoD don’t have to abide by these “rules” if the SecDef writes a memo granting an exception or if the President issues a directive or EO (some of which remain classified, if I understand correctly).
IOW, if I’m understanding it correctly, this “issuance” is not binding for federal agencies or departments cooerating with the DoD if the SecDef or President issues a (possibly classified) exception.
So, for instance, if the DoD says that Iran is trying to assassinate Trump and requests the Secret Service to assist them in thwarting those attempts, either the SecDef or Biden (or his controllers, let’s be honest) can write a classified directive or memo telling Secret Service that they don’t have to abide by this already-watered-down “intention” to not assassinate anybody.
If I’m misunderstanding this, somebody please correct me. Notice also that the language in this “issuance” preceding the part that removes the “under no circumstances” uses the word MUST. If these bureaucrats eliminated the word “shall” because they feared “shall” would be confusing, then they would have used the word “must” just like they did in this issuance right before they suddenly changed the language to “will”. This is deliberate - not just trying to get rid of any ambiguity from the word “shall”.
Geeze, I wonder why they would telegraph their intent like this. Seems like to me they would just ignore the rules like they normally do rather than making a public change, even a ‘quiet one’..
Amen.
Intimidation of the citizenry.
To me it’s like this: they either think that there will be no blowback if they pull off what it looks like they want to pull off, or they’re not worried about it because they believe they can handle it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.