Posted on 09/24/2024 7:04:15 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Numerous journalists inadvertently exposed how historical data on global temperatures, when properly contextualized, undermines the urgency and extremism often promoted by climate alarmists. MSM outlets have increasingly focused on pushing headlines about the “hottest day ever” while ignoring long-term climate patterns that tell a different story.
Central to this revelation is a study cited by The Washington Post that charts global surface temperatures over the last 485 million years. Contrary to the alarming reports about recent temperature increases, the Earth's current average temperature of 58.96°F (14.98°C) is significantly lower than the 96.8°F (36°C) experienced about 100 million years ago. In fact, Earth has been cooling for roughly 50 million years. Despite this, mainstream climate coverage focuses solely on recent temperature data, creating a false sense of impending doom.
Climate deniers have been out in force this week telling me that the cold in US is proof that climate change does not exist and Earth is cooling
Reality warming has weakened the Jet Stream and Polar Vortex allowing cold air to sweep into parts of USA and warm air into Arctic
— GO GREEN (@ECOWARRIORSS) November 22, 2022
This pattern of selective reporting has become a hallmark of corporate media's climate alarmism. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), for example, is often cited as a leading authority on climate change. However, critics argue that the IPCC’s reports, while claiming to be scientific, are shaped by political interests. These reports tend to overstate human-induced climate change while downplaying natural factors such as solar cycles and volcanic activity. According to Richard Lindzen, a former IPCC contributor, the IPCC is flawed because it focuses solely on man-made climate change, ignoring natural variability.
Moreover, concerns have been raised about the accuracy of temperature data used to justify these claims. A growing number of scientists are questioning the reliability of climate models and temperature monitoring stations. Research shows that many of the temperature stations used by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) are compromised by “heat biases” due to urbanization and faulty adjustments made through a process known as “homogenization.” This process, intended to correct anomalies, may be introducing more inaccuracies instead.
The climate worms turns:
1. NYTimes climate propagandist Raymond Zhong @zhonggg reported last month that the Atlantic Meridiondal Overturning Circulation (AMOC) was slowing and that this was a "climate tipping point." https://t.co/lMlMuYyUvV
2. But a new study says the current the measurements were erroneous and the AMOC is strong as ever.
https://junkscience.com/2024/09/2-minute-junking-gulf-stream-slowing-to-cause-an-ice-age/
3. Emissions-driven warming is a hoax. Not a single claim stands up to the slightest scrutiny.
— Steve Milloy (@JunkScience) September 22, 2024
One prominent skeptic, Anthony Watts of the Heartland Institute, has pointed out that over 90% of NOAA’s climate stations are affected by these biases, rendering their data unreliable. This widespread data corruption suggests that much of the fear-mongering around climate change may be built on a flawed foundation.
Adding to the skepticism, many climate policies, such as carbon taxes and renewable energy mandates, are being implemented based on these questionable data sets. Some scientists argue that these policies are less about environmental protection and more about economic control, as massive amounts of taxpayer dollars are funneled into green energy projects, which often benefit a select group of corporations and political elites.
For example, recent heatwaves and hurricanes were widely covered by corporate media as evidence of catastrophic global warming. Yet, meteorological records show a steady decline in the frequency of hurricanes and other extreme weather events over the past few decades. A 2022 study published in *Nature* noted a 13% decrease in tropical cyclone frequency since the pre-industrial era, further undermining the alarmist narrative.
The disparity between MSM’s dire warnings and the actual climate data is leading many to reconsider the legitimacy of the climate crisis narrative. Skeptics argue that while the Earth’s climate is undoubtedly changing, much of the change can be attributed to natural phenomena rather than human activity.
Not only did the dinosaurs refuse to switch to EVs, their farts were something fierce.
How many of AOC’s years are left ?
Wikipedia says there were 5 ice ages. What warmed the earth in between?
Yeah...but I bet they had nice lawns.
RE: How many of AOC’s years are left ?
AOC told us in 2019 that we have 12 years before climate armageddon. Which means we have barely 7 years to doomsday.
The Earth does not exist without outside influences. There are pesky things like the Sun and other planets that influence the Earth. These in turn influence the shifting of the magnetic poles, rotation of the molten iron core, tectonic plate movements, etc. Sunspot cycles are a huge influence. Other people might say outer space aliens and nuclear war, but no reliable records exist.
[[Which means we have barely 7 years to doomsday.]]
Not even enough time for the Tribulation to happen? lol
The sun?
Thank you. I couldn’t figure out how to search for that among all the texts in which it’s mentioned.
btrl
Only 6.33 years left.
Bad news and good news on global warming:
First the bad news. Al Gore and the Sierra Club announced that in six years the Arctic will be permanently free of ice. That would be about a 60 degree increase in temperature, which would be catastrophic.
Now for the good news. They made that prediction in 2008. If there was any merit to their claim, the 60 degree increase in temperatures would have happened by now. It has not happened. We can conclude that there was no merit to their fear mongering claim.
Bookmark
Sometimes it's more directly west to east, other times there are major waves in it, called *longitudinal flow* or *meridional flow*.
lol
Gee...ya don’t say.
It was never about “saving the planet”. It was always about redistributing American tax dollars for political power. They started from a faulty assumption and found evidence to support it. By found, it is simply made up.
This cannot be undone. The Redistribution of wealth has been completed, people have believed the “experts” above common sense and science you can actually observe.
This country is a broke number one importer of trafficked children at war anywhere there is a lithium, gas or other rare natural resource.
The democrats have successfully destroyed the family and replaced reason with “settled science”.
There is plenty of cosmological, biological evidence they are wrong about a lot of things just in this article.
We lost America during COVID. The USis subverting the Constituion by implementing every global policy they desire. Locking up Journalists and Free Speech enablers worldwide.
And republicans fund it every year.
I truly no longer think this country has anything good to offer the world.
I work in healthcare- 90 percent of them are full scale marxists- buying Kamalas fair share line. They are insane.
But so is mass chemical abortion which Trump and Vance vendorse. Hospitals are covering up the extreme danger of this Planned Parenthood goodie.
Healthcare has turned into something sinister and the masks are off after COVID.
Nobody blinks when they openly sell Baby parts from children they Keep Alive to harvest organs.
As long as they cure cancer and Alzheimers and we can live forever, we will comply and willingly support.
“ A growing number of scientists are questioning the reliability of climate models and temperature monitoring stations. ”
It’s absurd they can claim to measure average global temperatures showing claimed increases if a few degrees over decades that can never be less than standard error in their method.
And as this quote points out there is absolutely zero sop or validation of collected data.
We were supposed to be in an Ice Age now according to those screaming about it in the 1970s.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
