Worlds biggest banks just nuked Harris/Biden’s ‘Green New Deal’ dream…

Revolver News ^ | September 24, 2024 | Revolver

[E. Pluribus Unum]

It might be time to wave bye-bye to the Marxist “Green New Deal” and say HELLO to nuclear power. The world’s top banks have had enough of the green nightmare and are now pledging their support for nuclear energy. The Harris/Biden regime just took a direct nuclear hit to their tyrannical green agenda, and they may never recover. Actually, to get an idea of how deep this goes, BNP told the “Financial Times” there’s “no scenario” where the world can hit carbon neutrality by 2050 without nuclear power. In addition, Barclays is also board. They believe that nuclear power could solve the problem of unreliable wind and solar energy. In other words, the global elites’ green plan is an epic failure—just like many of us predicted long ago.

Mark Nelson:

BREAKING IN NYC: WORLD’S BIGGEST BANKS PLEDGE SUPPORT FOR NUCLEAR

Banks and funds totaling $14 TRILLION in assets have just signed an unprecedented statement in support of nuclear power.

They’ll be presenting the pledge to support the goal of tripling nuclear THIS MORNING at the Rockefeller Center in New York City to kick off NY Climate Week.

A few of the names:

Bank of America
Barclays
BNP Paribas
Brookfield
Citi
Credit Agricole
Goldman Sachs
Morgan Stanley
Rothschild & Co

The pledge comes after Microsoft signs deal to buy $16 billion in electricity from a revived Three Mile Island nuclear plant alone over 20 years to fuel its AI ambitions.

I’ll be covering live today from the top of the Rockefeller Center, famously built with oil profits, as this unprecedented show of support for the next great energy source overcomes long-held financing barriers.

BREAKING IN NYC: WORLD'S BIGGEST BANKS PLEDGE SUPPORT FOR NUCLEAR

Banks and funds totaling $14 TRILLION in assets have just signed an unprecedented statement in...

[READINABLUESTATE]

If wind and solar are so unreliable that they require nuclear backup it’s stupid to invest in them in the first place.
Just build more reactors.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

"If wind and solar are so unreliable that they require nuclear backup it’s stupid to invest in them in the first place."

https://www.law.utoronto.ca/blog/faculty/wind-power-complete-disaster

There is no evidence that industrial wind power is likely to have a significant impact on carbon emissions. The European experience is instructive. Denmark, the world's most wind-intensive nation, with more than 6,000 turbines generating 19% of its electricity, has yet to close a single fossil-fuel plant. It requires 50% more coal-generated electricity to cover wind power's unpredictability, and pollution and carbon dioxide emissions have risen (by 36% in 2006 alone).

[Sirius Lee]

Amen!

[Tell It Right]

Soon the left will pretend that they were always on the side of nuclear and it was only Neanderthal conservatives who stopped nuclear.

[Revel]

At the end of the day there is nothing less green than Nuclear power. The only difference is that instead of having pollution that dissipates in days or weeks we end up with pollution that takes 100 thousand years to even get near.

[Tell It Right]

I like hydro power. But if I understand it correctly, we’ve about dammed up everywhere we can that can give us continuous power.

[Ronald77]

Save the birds, get his of wind and solar generated electricity go nuclear.

[frank ballenger]

I’ll whisper this: Has anyone told Greta?

[cymbeline]

“If wind and solar are so unreliable that they require ...”

Also, they’re no good for fueling transportation unless the vehicles are battery powered, and fossil fuels will be king for a long time in that category.

Unless - the world could learn to live on a lot less energy.

I kind like that idea but it won’t happen until energy prices go way up, which will happen slowly as the energy sources are exhausted.

[blackdog]

Not enough bribes in the “Inflation Reduction Act”?

[Vaduz]

The Marxist “Green New Deal” and say HELLO to nuclear power.

Indeed it fits in nicely for a scam of the AI story for the likes of Microsoft a front for a mandatory all electric appliances and autos comrades?.

Bank of America
Barclays
BNP Paribas
Brookfield
Citi
Credit Agricole
Goldman Sachs
Morgan Stanley
Rothschild & Co

[butlerweave]

Green is a scam

[Dawgreg]

I’ll whisper this: Has anyone told Greta?

Or AOC.......if you don’t see her in the next few weeks she may be in the bug house. We’ll know if she appears totally white haired. Did you see anything about the gooberment financing this travesty with money from Medicare???? Vote RED folks! These demon-possessed leftists are going to destroy our country!!

[Libloather]

DRILL BABY, DRILL!

[Revel]

Well in California they have been tearing down the dams and the hydro plants. It is a great source for power.

[jpp113]

Klaus is NOT pleased. LOL

[dagunk]

At the end of the day there is nothing less green than Nuclear power. The only difference is that instead of having pollution that dissipates in days or weeks we end up with pollution that takes 100 thousand years to even get near.

******************************************************8

Reprocess nuclear fuel, routinely done in Europe, Russia, Japan. Google it.

I’m sure this will set you off but that’s the way it goes.

[Revel]

Is that why the fuel pools at Fukushima were full of hundreds of spent fuel rods. It sounds like your tale does not hold up in reality.

[Don W]

Because of the luddites who oppose nuclear power, re=processing spent fuel rods is ILLEGAL in America. Europe has been reprocessing for YEARS, but Jimmy Carter led the charge against that activity in North America. Japan was capable of reprocessing but American interference slowed the process.