Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

“Did they actually arrest the person and were they charged?”

Not to even mention that an “arrest” is NOT a “conviction”. You are guilty of nothing until you are convicted. But they keep property such as firearms even if you are never convicted and deemed guilty.


29 posted on 08/17/2024 2:33:14 AM PDT by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Openurmind
Correct, but that was my threshold for even thinking about taking people's stuff is you need to have been arrested and charged.

To keep should require (A) a conviction and (B) proof from the state that such items were either used by the owner in or the fruit of the crime the person was convicted of.

If the person is not arrested and charged you may not touch their stuff.

Unless both A and B have been met you need to give their stuff back.

Just recently the Supreme Court in my state ruled that you could not just take someone's car because they gave someone, who was a drug user, a ride when there were no drugs found on the driver, on the passenger or in the car.

You would think that would be logical.

But no. She had to take to the highest court in the state to get her 2006 Ion back.

This taking of people's stuff is out of hand.

34 posted on 08/17/2024 5:28:39 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear ( Roses are red, Violets are blue, I love being on the government watch list, along with all of you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson