There are a large number of analysis on X of these photos. Most of them are zoomed in on the crowd and they are clearly fake people. There are heads floating by themselves and other strange things. If you’ve ever generated AI photos of people you’ll know exactly what I’m talking about.
One guy had the neck of a giraffe.
So why does this “reporter” say there is no evidence?
I don’t think these jerks know what evidence is. I’d say maybe they honestly don’t know what evidence there is, but right in the piece after they say there’s no evidence they mention the lack of reflections on the plane. Is that not evidence? And if there are a lot of places on X where the manipulated images of the crowd are pointed out, you’d think the reporter would have seen those.
It’s the standard playbook though. I’m waiting for them to say that Trump said - without evidence - that the sun rose in the east today. These people make me sick.
Only the diehard, DS plants are arguing that these pics are real.
Telling.
I find it hard to believe that a huge crowd of people would be allowed on the tarmac at a regular commercial airport like that, even if it was real.
Otherwise, it is just so discouraging that the MSM doesn’t look into issues like this. They likely have proof either way, as to whether the crowd was genuine.
There’s a pic of the crowd and theres a guy with a white ball cap on, and the guy next to him has transparent arms...